Mineral oils: processes and products – Chemical conversion of hydrocarbons – Cracking
Reexamination Certificate
2001-11-21
2004-08-24
Griffin, Walter D. (Department: 1764)
Mineral oils: processes and products
Chemical conversion of hydrocarbons
Cracking
C208S150000, C208S151000, C208S153000, C208S159000, C208S164000, C422S144000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06780308
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to processes and apparatus for the fluidized contacting of catalyst with hydrocarbons. More specifically, this invention relates to processes and apparatus for stripping entrained or adsorbed hydrocarbons from catalyst particles.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A variety of processes contact finely divided particulate material with a hydrocarbon containing feed under conditions wherein a fluid maintains the particles in a fluidized condition to effect transport of the solid particles to different stages of the process. Catalyst cracking is a prime example of such a process that contacts hydrocarbons in a reaction zone with a catalyst composed of finely divided particulate material. The hydrocarbon feed fluidizes the catalyst and typically transports it in a riser as the catalyst promotes the cracking reaction. As the cracking reaction proceeds, substantial amounts of hydrocarbon, called coke, are deposited on the catalyst. A high temperature regeneration within a regeneration zone burns coke from the catalyst by contact with an oxygen-containing stream that again serves as a fluidization medium. Coke-containing catalyst, referred to herein as spent catalyst, is continually removed from the reaction zone and replaced by essentially coke-free catalyst from the regeneration zone. Fluidization of the catalyst particles by various gaseous streams allows the transport of catalyst between the reaction zone and regeneration zone. Methods for cracking hydrocarbons in a fluidized stream of catalyst, transporting catalyst between reaction and regeneration zones and combusting coke in the regenerator are well known to those skilled in the art of FCC processes. To this end, the art is replete with vessel configurations for contacting catalyst particles with feed and regeneration gas, respectively.
A majority of the hydrocarbon vapors that contact the catalyst in the reaction zone are separated from the solid particles by ballistic and/or centrifugal separation methods within the reaction zone. However, the catalyst particles employed in an FCC process have a large surface area, which is due to a great multitude of pores located in the particles. As a result, the catalytic materials retain hydrocarbons within their pores, upon the external surface of the catalyst and in the spaces between individual catalyst particles as they enter the stripping zone. Although the quantity of hydrocarbons retained on each individual catalyst particle is very small, the large amount of catalyst and the high catalyst circulation rate which is typically used in a modern FCC process results in a significant quantity of hydrocarbons being withdrawn from the reaction zone with the catalyst.
Therefore, it is common practice to remove, or strip, hydrocarbons from spent catalyst prior to passing it into the regeneration zone. Improved stripping brings economic benefits to the FCC process by reducing “delta coke”. Delta coke is the weight percent coke on spent catalyst less the weight percent coke on regenerated catalyst. Reducing delta coke in the FCC process permits a lowering of the regenerator temperature. Consequently, more of the resulting, relatively cooler regenerated catalyst is required to supply the fixed heat load in the reaction zone. The reaction zone may hence operate at a higher catalyst-to-feed or catalyst-to-oil (C/O) ratio. The higher C/O ratio increases conversion which increases the production of valuable products. Accordingly, improved stripping results in improved conversion. A stripping operation that reduces the production of delta coke by 0.05 wt-% can lower the regenerator temperature by 8° to 11° C. (15° to 20° F.) and permit a C/O ratio increase in the range of 6%. The corresponding improvement in conversion yields 0.6 to 0.7 vol-% more gasoline as well also increasing the yield of desired light products. Additionally, stripping hydrocarbons from the catalyst also allows recovery of the hydrocarbons as products.
The most common method of stripping the catalyst passes a stripping gas, usually steam, through a flowing stream of catalyst, counter-current to its direction of flow. Such steam stripping operations, with varying degrees of efficiency, remove the hydrocarbon vapors which are entrained with the catalyst and adsorbed on the catalyst. Contact of the catalyst with a stripping medium may be accomplished in a simple open vessel as demonstrated by U.S. Pat. No. 4,481,103 B1.
The efficiency of catalyst stripping is increased by using vertically spaced baffles to cascade the catalyst from side to side as it moves down a stripping apparatus and counter-currently contacts a stripping medium. Moving the catalyst horizontally increases contact between the catalyst and the stripping medium so that more hydrocarbons are removed from the catalyst. In these arrangements, the catalyst is given a labyrinthine path through a series of baffles located at different levels. Catalyst and gas contact is increased by this arrangement that leaves no open vertical path of significant cross-section through the stripping apparatus. Further examples of these stripping devices for FCC units are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,440,620 B1, U.S. Pat. No. 2,612,438 B1, U.S. Pat. No. 3,894,932 B1, U.S. Pat. No. 4,414,100 B1 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,364,905 B1. These references show the typical stripping vessel arrangement having a stripping vessel, a series of outer baffles in the form of frusto-conical sections that direct the catalyst inwardly onto a series of inner baffles. The inner baffles are centrally located conical or frusto-conical sections that divert the catalyst outwardly onto the outer baffles. The stripping medium enters from below the lower baffles and continues rising upwardly from the bottom of one baffle to the bottom of the next succeeding baffle. Variations in the baffles include the addition of skirts about the trailing edge of the baffle as depicted in U.S. Pat. No. 2,994,659 B1 and the use of multiple linear baffle sections at different baffle levels as demonstrated in
FIG. 3
of U.S. Pat. No. 4,500,423 B1. A variation in introducing the stripping medium is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,541,801 B1 where a quantity of fluidizing gas is admitted at a number of discrete locations. Baffles can also include an upstanding weir on the edge of the baffle adjacent the downcorner.
Currently in stripping vessels for FCC units, the baffles are typically oriented to have an angle of 45° with respect to the horizontal. The sloped baffles assure that catalyst moves off the tray down to the next level in the stripping vessel. Sloped baffles generate a differential pressure head between holes that are lower in elevation on a baffle compared to the holes which are higher in elevation on the baffle. Because the pressure is going to be greater at lower elevations on the baffle, the velocity through the jets on the baffle will be greater at higher elevations on the baffle. Sloped baffles typically have several rows of holes near the bottom portion of the baffle. These trays perform well at low catalyst fluxes but have had very large stagnant zones occupying nearly two-thirds of the stripper vessel.
Residence time of catalyst in the stripper is expected to be a significant factor because the stripper is a secondary reactor where adsorbed heavy hydrocarbons undesirably continue to react producing coke and light hydrocarbons such as hydrogen, methane, ethane, ethylene, propane and propylene. The greater the amount of stagnant or dead zones, the greater the amount of heavy hydrocarbons that will continue to react.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,531,884 B1 attempts to utilize a tubular downcorner near the central region of the baffle to improve flux capabilities. However, such tubular downcorners do not serve well to mix catalysts and stripping fluid but rather passes either one without mixing with the other at particular times resulting in a degradation of stripping efficiency.
U.S. application Ser. No. 09/746,751 filed Dec. 21, 2000 improves the baffle configuration by
Hedrick Brian W.
Nguyen Thuy Khanh T.
Arnold Jr. James
Griffin Walter D.
Paschall James C.
Tolomei John G.
UOP LLC
LandOfFree
Stripping process with disproportionately distributed... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Stripping process with disproportionately distributed..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Stripping process with disproportionately distributed... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3341213