Electricity: motive power systems – Switched reluctance motor commutation control
Reexamination Certificate
1998-06-19
2001-12-18
Salata, Jonathan (Department: 2837)
Electricity: motive power systems
Switched reluctance motor commutation control
C318S434000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06331757
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to a unipolar phase DC brushless motor and, more particularly, it relates to a staggered pulse width modulation (PWM) apparatus and method for electromagnetic interference (EMI) minimization in a unipolar phase DC brushless motor.
2. Background of Related Art
In any four (4), or five (5) phases, of a unipolar brushless DC motor, only two of the motor phases are energized at any given time. For instance, in a four (4) phase motor (essentially a two phase motor), only two motor phases are energized at any given time resulting in only fifty (50%) percent of the copper being utilized at any given time during operation of the motor. Likewise, in a five (5) phase motor, only two (2) motor phases are energized at any given time during operation of the motor.
FIG. 24
is a graph illustrating the conventional technique of simultaneously energizing the active phases of a unipolar brushless DC motor when pulse width modulation (PWM) is used.
In particular, since the supply current ripple of the motor is proportional to the current in the two (2) motor phases which are switched on simultaneously, there is a significant contribution to high frequency electromagnetic interference (EMI) on the motor supply leads. The electromagnetic interference is typically due to noise caused by the rate of change in supply current (di/dt) in the high power stage of a printed circuit board (PCB) where high inductance exists. Generally, high impedance traces exist because of space limitations placed on designers to provide a high power electronic motor package in minimal packaging space.
FIGS. 25A
to
25
D show a modulation of the width of each of the pulses within the activation phase shown in FIG.
24
. In particular,
FIGS. 25A and 25B
show the same pulsed signals in an activation phase, with each of the pulsed signals having a duty cycle of less than 50%.
FIGS. 25C and 25D
show pulsed signals having a duty cycle of greater than 50%.
Conventional techniques have attempted to minimize electromagnetic interference from motors. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,440,214 to Peeters (hereinafter ‘Peeters’) discloses drive control and interface apparatus for driving a stepper motor. The drive control and interface apparatus of Peeters attempts to minimize possible electrical noise spikes by turning the drives on and off with a fixed delay between the turn on and turn off times. Unfortunately, Peeters does not address minimization of noise harmonics due to variations in line current when two phases are turned on, nor when the current in both coils increases simultaneously.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,666,042 to Lewis discloses a switching current spike limiter for a three phase coupled inductor conductive battery changer. The current spike limiter of Lewis includes a PWM driver which boosts the voltage by pulse width modulating the lower switches in a concurrent or staggered fashion. Unfortunately, Lewis fails to disclose details regarding the staggering, e.g., whether the staggering is conducted with a fixed or variable delay, nor the intended purpose of the staggering of the pulses. Furthermore, the current spike limiter of Lewis relates specifically to a battery charger, not to a drive for a motor.
Accordingly, there exists a need for providing a motor drive which minimizes EMI in a unipolar or bipolar phase DC brushless motor. Moreover, there is a need for providing a motor drive which minimizes noise harmonics caused by an increase in the supply current during the time the current in two coils is increasing.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a motor driver circuit comprises a first driver to activate a first winding of the motor with a first pulsed signal. A second driver activates a second winding of the motor with a second pulsed signal. Individual pulses of the first pulsed signal are staggered with respect to individual pulses of the second pulsed signal.
A method for minimizing electromagnetic interference in a motor having a supply current and a plurality of motor phases in accordance with the principles of the present invention comprises staggering individual pulses in any one activation of a phase of the motor by alternately energizing any two windings of the motor.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of driving a motor comprises simultaneously activating a first winding of the motor and the second winding of the motor during a same phase. The first winding is driven with a first pulsed signal, and the second winding is driven with a second pulsed signal. Individual pulses of the first pulsed signal are staggered with respect to individual pulses of the second pulsed signal.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for minimizing electromagnetic interference in a unipolar phase motor having a supply current, the motor further having a plurality of motor phases energizable with a pulsed signal, comprises calculating current harmonics on a right edge aligned pulsed signal. Current harmonics are calculated on a left edge aligned pulsed signal. A supply current is determined by summing the calculated current harmonics for the right edge aligned pulsed signal and the current harmonics for the left edge aligned pulsed signal. One of the plurality of motor phases is energized. Individual pulses of the right edge aligned pulsed signal are staggered with respect to individual pulses of the left edge aligned pulsed signal for each successive motor phase by varying an activation of any two adjacently energized phases based on the determined supply current, whereby at least one of electromagnetic interference and current harmonic generation due to any increase in the supply current are minimized.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4514667 (1985-04-01), Sakmann et al.
patent: 4644234 (1987-02-01), Nola
patent: 4682093 (1987-07-01), Murphy et al.
patent: 4720663 (1988-01-01), Welch et al.
patent: 4897583 (1990-01-01), Rees
patent: 4904918 (1990-02-01), Bailey et al.
patent: 5221881 (1993-06-01), Cameron
patent: 5440214 (1995-08-01), Peeters
patent: 5614803 (1997-03-01), Morioka et al.
patent: 5616996 (1997-04-01), Tang et al.
patent: 5652493 (1997-07-01), Hendershot, Jr.
patent: 5666042 (1997-09-01), Lewis
patent: 5682088 (1997-10-01), Sonnek
patent: 2745824B (1979-03-01), None
patent: 0676859A (1995-10-01), None
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 096, No. 010, Oct. 31, 1996 from JP 08154395 A (Jun., 11, 1996).
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 097, No. 001, Jan. 31, 1997 from JP 08242587 A (Sep. 17, 1996).
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 018, No. 540, Oct. 14, 1994 from JP 0618953 A (Jul. 8, 1994).
Salata Jonathan
Siemens Canada Limited
LandOfFree
Staggered pulse width modulation apparatus and method for... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Staggered pulse width modulation apparatus and method for..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Staggered pulse width modulation apparatus and method for... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2556725