Refrigeration – Structural installation – With electrical component cooling
Reexamination Certificate
2000-12-11
2002-02-26
Bennett, Henry (Department: 3744)
Refrigeration
Structural installation
With electrical component cooling
C062S064000, C165S080400, C165S104330
Reexamination Certificate
active
06349554
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to cooling systems for heat-generating devices and, more particularly, to a spray cooling system and a method of using the spray cooling system to cool a heat source.
With the advent of semiconductor devices having increasingly large component densities, the removal of heat generated by the devices has become an increasingly challenging technical issue. Furthermore, typical processor boards can, in some instances, include multiple CPU modules, application-specific integrated circuits (ICs), and static random access memory (SRAM), as well as a dc-dc converter. Heat sinks can be used to increase the heat-dissipating surface area of such devices. However, heat sinks, and their interfaces to the cooled devices, can provide interference in the heat flow, and can lead to uneven cooling.
Known cooling methods for semiconductors include free-flowing and forced-air convection, free-flowing and forced-liquid convection, pool boiling (i.e., boiling a liquid cooling fluid off of a submerged device), and spray cooling (i.e., boiling a liquid cooling fluid off of a device being sprayed with the liquid). Because liquids typically have a high latent heat of vaporization, these latter two methods provide for a high heat-transfer efficiency, absorbing a large quantity of heat at a constant temperature. Typically, the cooling fluid used has a relatively low boiling point (the temperature to maintain) and is inert to the heat source. For semiconductor devices, FED. CIR.-72, i.e., Fluorinert®, sold by 3M Corporation, is one of a number of known suitable cooling liquids.
The use of these boiling/vaporizing methods is limited to a maximum power density, the critical heat flux (CHF). At higher densities, the vaporized cooling fluid forms a vapor barrier insulating the device from the liquid cooling fluid, thus allowing the wall temperature of the device to increase greatly. This phenomenon is referred to as pooling. When a coolant is properly sprayed, it can disperse such a vapor layer, and its CHF can be well over an order of magnitude higher than the CHF of a pool boiling system. This high CHF is reliant on having a uniform spray. Thus, spray cooling presently provides the most efficient cooling for a heat-generating device, such as a semiconductor device.
Typically, current sprayer designs employ either pressurized liquid spraying or pressurized gas atomizing. A number of factors affect the performance of spray cooling, thus affecting the heat transfer coefficient h and/or the CHF. It is commonly understood that surface roughness and wettability of the sprayed component are two of these factors, and the orientation of the surface being sprayed can be a third. In particular, it is believed that h is higher for rough surfaces when using a pressurized liquid spray, and for smooth surfaces when using gas atomizing. Surfaces with decreased wettability appear to have a marginal increase in h.
Critical to consistent, controlled cooling is the controlled application of the liquid cooling fluid in a desired distribution, flow rate, and velocity. For example, at a low mass flow rate, CHF and h increase with the mass flow rate. However, at a critical mass flow rate, the advantages of increased mass flow are diminished due to pooling and/or due to a transition to single phase heat transfer. Thus, a spray cooling system is preferably operated uniformly at a mass flow rate defined at a point before the critical mass flow rate is reached. All of these factors make critical the design of the sprayer, i.e., the design of the nozzle and its related spray devices.
Also important to the cooling system design is its operating temperature. In particular, it is desirable to configure the system to operate at a high h, which will occur with a design temperature above the boiling temperature and below a temperature that will dry out the sprayed coolant. The amount of heat to be dissipated must be less than the CHF.
For pressure-assisted spraying, consistent, controlled spraying requires one or more high pressure pumps that provide a precise pressure to pump the liquid through a nozzle, even at varying flow rates. Both the distribution and the flow rate of the sprayed liquid can change with variations in the driving pressure and/or small variations in the nozzle construction. Thus, the cooling system is a sensitive and potentially expensive device that can be a challenge to control.
For gas atomizing, consistent, controlled spraying requires a pressurized gas that is delivered to a sprayhead design in a precise manner. Because the gas must be pressurized separately from the cooling fluid, such systems are not typically closed systems. The gas must be bled out for the condenser to run efficiently. Furthermore, both the distribution and the flow rate of the cooling fluid can change with variations in the gas pressure. Thus, the cooling system is a sensitive and potentially expensive device that can be a challenge to control.
Accordingly, there has existed a need for an accurate, reliable and cost-efficient spray cooling system. The present invention satisfies these and other needs, and provides further related advantages.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a spray cooling system for cooling a heat source, embodiments of which can exhibit improved accuracy, reliability and/or cost efficiency. Embodiments of the invention typically feature an incremental sprayer configured to eject an incremental amount of the cooling fluid on the heat source. The cooling fluid is sprayed in response to a control signal, which is sent to the sprayer by a controller.
Advantageously, these features provide for accurate delivery of cooling fluid at precise and controllable rates. The technology for this type of incremental sprayer is well developed in the ink-jet printer arts, and it is relatively inexpensive to manufacture. Furthermore, the design can be modular, offering quickly and easily replaceable units.
The invention further features the use of thermal ink-jet technology in designing the sprayer. In particular, the embodiment of the invention may have a body, defining a chamber configured to hold a volume of the cooling fluid, an defining an orifice in communication with the chamber. A heating element is in thermal communication with the chamber, and is configured to vaporize a portion of the cooling fluid held within the chamber. The orifice is configured to direct cooling fluid from the chamber to the heat source upon the heating element vaporizing a portion of the cooling fluid held within the chamber.
This technology generally provides for efficient delivery of the cooling fluid to the heat source. Some known inert cooling fluids have viscosities and boiling points similar to that of ink-jet ink, and the ink-jet sprayers are typically adaptable to use with the cooling fluids. Furthermore, unlike typical ink-jet, cooling fluid does not contain particulate matter that can clog the system. Thus, the system is both reliable and cost efficient to design.
The invention further features the ejection of incremental amounts of a cooling fluid on the heat source, using an incremental sprayer, spaced over a number of time increments. Either the incremental time or the amount ejected can be varied to adjust the flow rate to an optimal level. The system can be controlled by monitoring, either directly or indirectly, the temperature of the heat source and the amount of pooling or dry-out that is occurring, if any. This can provide for optimized cooling of a heat source.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4490728 (1984-12-01), Vaught et al.
patent: 4500895 (1985-02-01), Buck et al.
patent: 4683481 (1987-07-01), Johnson
patent: 4794410 (1988-12-01), Taub et al.
patent: 5220804 (1993-06-01), Tilton et al.
patent: 5278584 (1994-
Bash Cullen E.
Patel Chandrakant D.
Bennett Henry
Hewlett--Packard Company
Jones Melvin
LandOfFree
Spray cooling system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Spray cooling system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Spray cooling system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2978359