Games using tangible projectile – Player held and powered – nonmechanical projector – per se,... – Racket or paddle; accessory therefor
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-17
2002-02-05
Chiu, Raleigh W. (Department: 3711)
Games using tangible projectile
Player held and powered, nonmechanical projector, per se,...
Racket or paddle; accessory therefor
Reexamination Certificate
active
06344006
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a sports racket. In the preferred embodiment, the present invention relates to a tennis racket having a uniform string structure such that all horizontal (transversal) strings are of equal length and all vertical (longitudinal) strings are of equal length.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A range of tennis rackets exist which have been designed to provide a more uniform, powerful, forgiving and controlled response to all hits, and a larger optimal (“sweet spot”) area of the racket face.
Typically, when a tennis player swings his racket to hit the ball, he assumes that the impact will be in the sweet spot of the racket face, and he swings accordingly. If the impact location on a conventional racket is not on the sweet spot, or off-center, the ball encounters strings of different length and the resultant ball trajectory is probably not going to be the desired one. Errors such as hits into the net, beyond the baseline, or too near the opponent, will often result. Further, balls hit off-center encounter strings of lengths that are different from one another and different from the lengths of the central strings. The ball will rebound with less speed than, and not consistent with, balls hit near the center of the racket face. Thus, for a given racket swing, the hit ball velocity is highly dependent on where on the face of the racket the ball is hit.
Additionally, with a conventional racket, when a ball strikes parallel strings of equal tension but of different lengths, the strings vibrate with different frequencies, so that the combined effect produces a less-than-optimal ball rebound speed.
In an effort to address some of the above deficiencies in conventional rackets, Woehrle et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,834,383, disclosed a tennis racket having equal string lengths for a limited section of the racket. In order to achieve equal transversal string lengths over a limited section of the racket, the side central regions of the head of this racket are formed differently than conventional rackets. The side central regions have internal ridges forming flat inner faces and extending parallel to the axis. Longitudinal strings of equal length in this limited section are achieved by providing a reverse or crowned throat on the frame having a curvature identical to the opposite end or crown of the head. The racket was designed with equal string lengths in a limited section of the face of the racket so that, at least in this limited section, the strings would provide substantially the same response.
Further, although the Woehrle et al. patent suggested making the racket strings of equal length in the area of the sweet spot at least, a greater section of the racket face, such consideration was not reduced to practice, but was rejected as unmarketable and unusable. The Woehrle et al. patent stated that “no practical way of achieving this end has been found.” Head, U.S. Pat. No. 3,999,756, suggested certain performance advantages provided by rackets with larger (elliptical) faces compared to the conventional rackets then in use. In particular, Head realized that the larger racket would move the racket face area in the beneficial direction toward the racket center of mass, would move the center of the racket face near the racket center of percussion, and would use longer strings which reduce the angular errors resulting from off-center hits.
Since Head's innovation, there have been numerous patents describing further improvements, including the Woehrle et al. patent. Although these developments led to further enhanced performance, the lack of serious computer modeling, as well as the lack of interesting new ideas, have impeded significant progress.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved racket.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a novel design for a racket, which has a sweet spot that is considerably larger than that of conventional rackets, so that the racket responds with the maximum possible degree of uniformity when a ball is struck almost anywhere on the racket face.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a novel design for a racket, having a larger face area than conventional rackets, in order to produce more hits and better hits.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a novel design for a racket, having longer strings over the entire racket face, in order to reduce deflection error for off-center hits.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a novel design for a racket, having the frame material placed at maximal distance from the central (long) racket axes, in order to increase the moment of inertia (“MOI”) of the racket about this axis and minimize the resultant racket rotation away from the ball for off-center hits and thereby increase forgiveness for off-center hits and reduce “tennis elbow” and related injuries.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a novel design for a racket which provides greater ball control.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a novel design for a racket in which the tensions and/or mass densities for the transversal and longitudinal strings may be chosen so that all of the strings on the racket vibrate with the same frequency in order to optimize both consistency and performance.
Accordingly, the present invention is a racket having a non-elliptical shaped head and racket face and an elongated handle. The overall width and length of the racket face are comparable to those of conventional (generally oval shaped) racket faces, but the racket face area is much larger. The racket face area is the largest possible for a given racket face width and length, providing a much larger sweet spot than a conventional racket. The new invention further provides maximally long strings at all points on the racket face.
The racket has a uniform string structure in which all of the transversal strings are equal in length and all of the longitudinal strings are equal in length. The means of attaching the strings to the frame of the present invention is the same as in conventional rackets.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1536255 (1925-05-01), Beal
patent: 3507494 (1970-04-01), Finkel
patent: 3734499 (1973-05-01), Goldstein
patent: 4013289 (1977-03-01), Kaminstein
patent: 4512575 (1985-04-01), Tzeng
patent: 4566695 (1986-01-01), Melby
patent: 4750742 (1988-06-01), Coupar
patent: 4834383 (1989-05-01), Woehrle et al.
patent: 4861029 (1989-08-01), Takatsuka
patent: 4964635 (1990-10-01), Fitzgerald
patent: D339394 (1993-09-01), Richards
patent: 5386991 (1995-02-01), Rochette
patent: 3347426 (1985-01-01), None
patent: 260208 (1988-03-01), None
patent: 2455906 (1981-01-01), None
patent: 2117253 (1983-10-01), None
patent: 8502294 (1987-03-01), None
Chiu Raleigh W.
Waldbaum Maxim H.
LandOfFree
Sports racket having a uniform string structure does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Sports racket having a uniform string structure, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Sports racket having a uniform string structure will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2984723