Speech signal distortion measurement which varies as a function

Details Speech signal distortion measurement which varies as a function Speech signal distortion measurement which varies as a function

1996-04-04

1998-08-11

Eisenzopf, Reihard J.

Data processing: speech signal processing, linguistics, language

Speech signal processing

For storage or transmission

704233, H04B 346

Patent

active

057941882

DESCRIPTION:

BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a method and apparatus for testing telecommunications apparatus.
2. Related Art
In testing telecommunications apparatus (for example, a telephone line, a telephone network, or communications apparatus such as a codec) a test signal is introduced to the input of the telecommunications apparatus, and some test is applied to the resulting output of the apparatus. It is known to derive "objective" test measurements, such as the signal to noise ratio, which can be calculated by automatic processing apparatus. It is also known to apply "subjective" tests, in which a human listener listens to the output of the telecommunications apparatus, and gives an opinion as to the quality of the output.
Some elements of telecommunications systems are linear. Accordingly, it is possible to apply simple artificial test signals, such as discrete frequency sine waves, swept sine signals or chirp signals, random or pseudo random noise signals, or impulses. The output signal can then be analyzed using, for example, Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) or some other spectral analysis technique. One or more such simple test signals are sufficient to characterise the behaviour of a linear system.
On the other hand, modern telecommunications systems include an increasing number of elements which are nonlinear and/or time variant. For example, modern low bit-rate digital speech codecs, forming part of mobile telephone systems, have a nonlinear response and automatic gain controls (AGCs), voice activity detectors (VADs) and associated voice switches, and burst errors contribute time variations to telecommunications systems of which they form part.
Accordingly, it is increasingly less possible to use simple test methods developed for linear systems to derive objective measure of the distortion or acceptability of telecommunications apparatus.
The low correlation between objective measures of system performance or distortion and the subjective response of a human user of the system means that such subjective testing remains the best way of testing telecommunications apparatus. However, subjective testing by using human listeners is expensive, time-consuming, difficult to perform, and inconsistent.
Recently in the paper "Measuring the Quality of Audio Devices" by John G. Beerends and Jan A. Stemerdink, presented at the 90th AES Convention, 1991 Feb. 19-22, Paris, printed in AES Preprints as Preprint 3070 (L-8) by the Audio Engineering Society, it has been proposed to measure the quality of a speech codec for digital mobile radio by using, as test signals; a database of real recorded speech and analyzing the corresponding output of the codec using a perceptual analysis method designed to correspond in some aspects to the processes which are thought to occur in the human ear.
It has also been proposed (for example in "Objective Measurement Method for Estimating Speech Quality of Low Bit Rate Speech Coding", Irii, Kurashima, Kitawaki and Itoh, NTT Review, Vol 3. No. 5 September 1991) to use an artificial voice signal (i.e. a signal which is similar in a spectral sense to the human voice, but which does not convey any intelligence) in conjunction with a conventional distortion analysis measure such as the cepstral distance (CD) measure, to measure the performance of telecommunications apparatus.
It would appear obvious, when testing apparatus such as a codec which is designed to encode human speech, and when employing an analysis method based on the human ear, to use real human speech samples as was proposed in the above paper by Beerends and Stemerdink. In fact, however, the performance of such test systems is not particularly good.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Our earlier International application PCT/GB93/01322 published on 6th Jan. 1994 as WO94/00922 (now parent U.S. application Ser. No. 08/351,421 filed Dec. 12, 1994) discloses a test system using an artificial speech test signal and a perceptual model analysis method.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invent

REFERENCES:
patent: 4860360 (1989-08-01), Boggs
patent: 4972484 (1990-11-01), Theile et al.
Quincy, "Prolog-Based Expert Pattern Recognition System Shell for Technology Independent, User-Oriented Classification of Voice Transmission Quality", IEEE Int Conf on Communications -Sessions 33.3, vol. 2, 7-10 Jun. 1987, Seattle (US), pp. 1164-1171.
Kubichek et al, "Speech Quality Assesment Using Expert Pattern Recognition Techniques", IEEE Pacific RIM Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing, 1-2 Jun. 1989, Victoria (CA), pp. 208-211, XP000077468.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 17, No. 202 (E-1353), 20 Apr. 1993 & JP-A-04 345327 (Nippon Telegr7teleph Corp), 1 Dec. 1992.
Gierlich, "New Measurement Methods for Determining The Transfer Characteristics of Telephone Terminal Equipment", Proceedings of 1992 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 10-13 May 1992, San Diego (US), New York (US), vol. 4, pp. 2069-2072.
Sobolev, "Estimation of Speech Signal Transmission Quality from Measurements of Its Spectral Dynamics", Telecommunications and Radio Engineering, vol. 47 No. 1, Jan. 1992, Washington US, pp. 16-21, XP000316414.
Beerends, "A Perceptual Audio Quality Measure Based on a Psychoacoustic Sound Representation", J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 40, No. 12, 1992, pp. 963-978.
Brandenburg et al, "NMR' and `MAsking Flag`: Evaluation of Quality Using Perceptual Criteria", AES 11th International Conference, pp. 169-179, 1992.
Zwicker et al, "Audio Engineering and Psychoacoustics: Matching Signals to the Final Receiver, the Human Auditory Sytem", J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 39, No. 3, 1991, pp. 115-126.
Irii et al, "Objective Measurement Method for Estimating Speech Quality of Low-Bit-Rate Speech Coding", NTT Review, vol. 3, No. 5, Sep. 1991, pp. 79-87.
Dimolitsas, et al, "Objective Speech Distortion Measures and Their Relevance to Speech Quality Assessments", IEE Proceedings, vol. 136, Pt. I, No. 5, Oct. 1989, pp. 317-324.
Herre et al, "Analysis Tool for Realtime Measurements Using Perceptual Criteria", AES 11th International Conference, 1992.
Kalittsev, "Estimated of the Information Content of Speech Signals", 1298 Telecommunications and Radio Engineering 47 (1992), Jan., No. 1, New York, US, pp. 11-15.
Beerends et al, "Measuring the Quality of Audio Devices", AES 90th Convention, (19 Feb. 1991), pp. 1-8.
Moore et al, "Suggested Formulae For Calculating Auditory-Filter Bandwidths and Excitation Patterns", J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74(3), Sep. 1983, pp. 750-753.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Speech signal distortion measurement which varies as a function does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Speech signal distortion measurement which varies as a function , we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Speech signal distortion measurement which varies as a function will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-403540