Catalyst – solid sorbent – or support therefor: product or process – Solid sorbent – Organic
Reexamination Certificate
2000-08-29
2002-09-03
Langel, Wayne A. (Department: 1754)
Catalyst, solid sorbent, or support therefor: product or process
Solid sorbent
Organic
C210S691000, C210S924000, C252S184000, C252S363500
Reexamination Certificate
active
06444611
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention details a process for control and clean up of minor and massive oil spills from the surface of water using pre-treated peanut hulls as sorbent. Method for producing such sorbent and its appropriated application technique in open waters are also detailed.
2. Introduction
It is well known that oil spills in open waters produce serious ecological, environmental and economical damage. According to the National Research Council estimates, the sources and amounts of oil-related pollutants dumped into the oceans each year are:
Down the Drain: 363 million gallons, including used engine oil that constitutes run-off from land, and municipal and industrial waste.
Routine Maintenance: 137 million gallons including bilge cleaning and other ship releases.
Up in smoke: 92 million gallons including air pollution, mainly from cars and industry.
Natural Seeps: 62 million gallons including seepage from ocean bottom and eroding sedimentary rocks.
Big Spills: 37 million gallons including tanker accidents.
Large spills, even though a relatively minor source of ocean oil pollution, can be devastating. Only about five percent of oil pollution in oceans are due to major tanker accidents, but one big spill can disrupt sea and shore life for miles. The impact of oil on shorelines may be particularly great where large areas of rocks, sand and mud are uncovered at low tide. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration estimates that the Exxon Valdez accident of 1989 in Alaska spilled around 11 million gallons of crude oil, killing 350,000 to 390,000 water fowl, 3,500 to 5,500 sea otters, and cost more than five billion US dollars. The impact on marine life was compounded by toxicity and tainting effect resulting from the chemical composition of the oil, as well as by the diversity and variability of biological systems and their sensitively to oil pollution. According to the same source of information, three years later the relative percent distribution of the oil mass released into the environment was:
50% Biodegraded/Photolysed
20% Atmospheric photolysis
14% Recovered
13% Subtidal sediment
2% Beached
1% Dispersed in water
From the above results it is clear that even after catastrophic spills like the Valdez, with enough time natural forces act to counteract the pollution. However, the worst immediate consequences of a massive oil spill are due to the shock produced by the overwhelming mass of hazardous substances suddenly released into an environment which was not prepared to digest it and unable to restore itself to its original condition by itself in a short time.
Thus, we can deduct that one of the fundamental aims of oil spill response strategies should be to react as soon as possible with appropriate countermeasures in order to restrict or minimize the spread of the damage. With that purpose in mind, it is the aim of the present invention to propose an alternative response methodology conceived for the treatment and remedy of extended polluted water surfaces with celerity, bearing in mind that the areal distribution of the injury is time dependent.
It is important to emphasize here that a sorbent composition of the present invention is apt and can be used with the same comparative advantages in many different situations, such as for treatment and remedy of routine maintenance spills, land spills and others, and may be applied directly on the polluted surface by any classical methodology. The preferred embodiment mainly focuses on an oil spill in open waters because, as it is well known to the skilled in the art, it is probably the worst condition to control, handle and remedy. The clean-up components are exposed to the punishing mercy of the elements, and are under dynamic conditions.
PRIOR ART
Many compounds, apparatus and techniques were proposed by the prior art to facilitate the mitigation of deleterious effect or the removal of oil pollutants from water. In a general sense, the scope of available tools and methodologies to combat such pollution can be summarized as follows:
Chemical Agents: elements, compounds or mixtures that coagulate, disperse, dissolve, emulsify, foam, neutralize, precipitate, reduce, solubilize, oxidize, concentrate, congeal, entrap, fix, make the pollutant mass more rigid or viscous. The above compounds include biological additives, dispersants, sinking agents, burning agents, but do not include solvents. Chemical Agents have been applied to disperse and biodegrade oil spills; however, such applications, far from be beneficial, could result in worse environmental damage.
Apparatus: skimmers, booms, pumps, hydrocyclones, barriers, mechanical separators, containers, filters, bags, separators, recovery vessels, etc. Apparatus are of limited effectiveness for the control and recovery of extended oil spills, and are very difficult or are unfeasible to be used under adverse meteorological conditions.
Sorbents: essentially inert and insoluble materials that are used to remove oil and hazardous substances from water through adsorption and/or absorption. They include:
a) organic products (peat, moss or straw, cellulose fibers or cork, corn cobs, chicken or duck feathers, wood chips, cereals;
b) mineral compounds, volcanic ash or perlite, vermiculite or zeolite;
c) synthetic products (polypropylene, polyethylene, polyurethane, polyester).
Mineral sorbents are of relatively high density, and after their spread on top of the water surface they sink to the bottom forming a stationary layer saturated with oil that affects the benthos. Synthetic sorbents are not biodegradable per se and need to be recovered and processed by treatment facilities for disposal Organic sorbents, including the herein proposed option, are biodegradable, non toxic, effective and usually cheap.
There are known the following patents related to the application based on methods of utilization of natural organic sorbents:
U.S. Pat. No. 3,617,564 disclosing the utilization of corncob components for the removal of oil spills from water and land.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,902,998 disclosing a method for removing oil from water based on the utilization of rice hulls as sorbent.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,154 disclosing the utilization of pre-treated wood chips for the cleanup of water and land oil spills.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,969,774 disclosing the use of pre-cooked and puffed cereals as oil spill sorbents.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,114,593 disclosing the application of dry and pulverized aquatic lily plant to the spilled oil.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,160,629 disclosing a method for removing organic substances from bodies of water using entire dried corn cobs in their natural state.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,780 discloses a method for absorbing, removing and cleaning up a liquid floating in a second liquid, employing absorbent pellets made from cellulose flakes.
Peanut shells were previously used as particulate cellulosic raw material for the production of a carbonaceous residue product or char. U.S. Pat. No. 4,145,256 discloses the procedure and apparatus for the carry out of such an operation. Even though at first glance some similitude exists to the above patent with the proposed sorbent pre-treatment methodology herein, the basic fabrication principles and resulting final products are clearly different. These differences will be evident after a detailed examination and comparison between both technical procedures, and can be summarized as follows:
in the abovementioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,145,256, peanut shells are submitted to a destructive discomposure. Reaction temperatures vary between 526° C. (975° F.) to 1315° C. (2410° F.); the result is that the final product is a devolatilized powdered or carbonaceous residue or char, having an elemental carbon content in excess of about ninety percent by weight.
in the same US patent such high temperatures are reached by the use of a controlled amount of forced air introduced into the system that produces the exothermic oxidation of the heavy tars distilled from shells.
in the same process, the heavier distilled tars condense on the shells in the
Langel Wayne A.
Shvartsman Mila
Strickland Jonas N.
LandOfFree
Sorbent composition and apparatus for removing oil or oily... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Sorbent composition and apparatus for removing oil or oily..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Sorbent composition and apparatus for removing oil or oily... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2871839