Data processing: software development – installation – and managem – Software program development tool – Testing or debugging
Reexamination Certificate
2007-10-22
2011-12-27
Kendall, Chuck (Department: 2192)
Data processing: software development, installation, and managem
Software program development tool
Testing or debugging
C717S124000, C717S127000, C717S130000
Reexamination Certificate
active
08087005
ABSTRACT:
A testing tool allowing convenient testing of programs and also classes in general. The tool automatically divides each program into many groups such that if one line (or statement) is executed it may reasonably be assumed that all the lines in the group are also executed. A tester is provided the ability to provide desired arguments (including class instances) and cause all groups to be executed such that all lines of code in the programs of a class are executed at least once. The groups are conveniently further logically combined into hierarchical blocks, with each block at a higher level corresponding to a logical structure such as if structure, for structure, while structure, etc. The blocks at the lowest level may contain a single group. Due to such hierarchy, a tester may visually easily identify the unexecuted blocks/groups. The tester may further define and execute small pieces of code (macros) in the middle of testing.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5355479 (1994-10-01), Torii
patent: 5729676 (1998-03-01), Inoue
patent: 5784553 (1998-07-01), Kolawa
patent: 5860009 (1999-01-01), Uchihira
patent: 6067639 (2000-05-01), Rodrigues
patent: 6173440 (2001-01-01), Darty
patent: 6343375 (2002-01-01), Gupta
patent: 6397378 (2002-05-01), Grey
patent: 6507842 (2003-01-01), Grey
patent: 7363618 (2008-04-01), Pal et al.
ATAC-Overview (chapter 3) published Jul. 15, 1998 (Google.com search).
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Sep. 25, 2003 Mail Non-Final Rejection.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Dec. 26, 2003 Response after Non-Final Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Mar. 10, 2004 Mail Final Rejection (PTOL-326).
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Aug. 18, 2004 Appeal Brief Filed.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Dec. 7, 2004 Mail Final Rejection (PTOL-326).
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Jan. 4, 2005 Amendment after Final Rejection.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Mar. 28, 2005 Supplemental Response.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Apr. 6, 2005 Mail Advisory Action (PTOL-303).
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Jun. 2, 2005 Miscellaneous Incoming Letter.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Jun. 8, 2005 Mail Non-Final Rejection.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Oct. 7, 2005 Response after Non-Final Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Dec. 30, 2005 Mail Final Rejection (PTOL-326).
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Jun. 5, 2006 Appeal Brief Filed.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Jul. 2, 2006 Amendment/Argument after Notice of Appeal.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Oct. 6, 2006 Mail Non-Final Rejection.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Mar. 6, 2007 Appeal Brief Filed.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,250, filed Feb. 14, 2001 (parent application JP920000411US1) Jul. 3, 2007 Mail Notice of Allowance.
Chaudhary Sanjeev K.
Kolar Vinay Kumar
Pal Kallol
England Anthony
International Business Machines - Corporation
Kendall Chuck
Steinberg William
LandOfFree
Software testing by groups does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Software testing by groups, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Software testing by groups will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4262919