Soft and hard sequence detection in ISI memory channels

Details Soft and hard sequence detection in ISI memory channels Soft and hard sequence detection in ISI memory channels

1999-03-01

2002-08-20

Pham, Chi (Department: 2631)

Pulse or digital communications

Receivers

Particular pulse demodulator or detector

C714S796000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06438180

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed generally to sequence detectors, and, more particularly, to sequence detectors in ISI memory channels.
2. Description of the Background
In recent years, there has been a major shift in the design of signal detectors in magnetic recording. Traditional peak detectors (PD), such as those described in Nakagawa et al., “A Study of Detection Methods of NRZ Recording”, IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 16, pp. 1041-110, January 1980, have been replaced by Viterbi-like detectors in the form of partial response maximum likelihood (PRML) schemes or hybrids between tree/trellis detectors and decision feedback equalizers (DFE), such as FDTS/DF, MDFE and RAM-RSE. These methods were derived under the assumption that additive white Gausian noise (AWGN) is present in the system. The resulting trellis/tree branch metrics are then computed as Euclidian distances.
It has long been observed that the noise in magnetic recording systems is neither white nor stationary. The nonstationarity of the media noise results from its signal dependent nature. Combating media noise and its signal dependence has thus far been confined to modifying the Euclidian branch metric to account for these effects. Zeng, et al., “Modified Viterbi Algorithm for Jitter-Dominated 1-D
2
Channel,” IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. MAG-28, pp. 2895-97, September, 1992, and Lee et al., “Performance Analysis of the Modified maximum Likelihood Sequence Detector in the Presence of Data-Dependent Noise,” Proceedings 26th Asilomar Conference, pp. 961-64, October 1992 have derived a branch metric computation method for combating the signal-dependent character of media noise. These references ignore the correlation between noise samples. The effectiveness of this method has been demonstrated on real data in Zayad et al., “Comparison of Equalization and Detection for Very High-Density Magnetic Recording,” IEEE INTERMAG Conference, New Orleans, April 1997.
These methods do not take into consideration the correlation between noise samples in the readback signal. These correlations arise due to noise coloring by front-end equalizers, media noise, media nonlinearities, and magnetoresistive (MR) head nonlinearities. This noise coloring causes significant performance degradation at high recording densities. Thus, there is a need for an adaptive correlation-sensitive maximum likelihood sequence detector which derives the maximum likelihood sequence detector (MLSD) without making the usual simplifying assumption that the noise samples are independent random variables.
Turbo codes were introduced in 1993 and hold the promise of substantial coding gains over current coding algorithms, and their performance is within a fraction of a dB of the Shannon theoretical limit for additive white Gaussian noise channels. The basic idea in turbo decoding and other iterative decoding strategies is to pass “soft” information between several components of the decoder and the detector. In this context, the detector is the first device that processes data which is observed at the output of the communications channel. Classically, the detector is a hard-detection device which provides zeroes and ones at its output. A Viterbi detector is a typical example of such a hard detector. When iterative decoding is used, however, the detector is often a soft detector in which the outputs of the detector are reliability measures for bits transmitted through the communications channel. Because the detector is the first device that processes the channel output, the detector should be tuned to the channel signal and noise statistics. However, existing soft output detectors are designed only for channels which are assumed to have white noise. Thus, there is a need for a soft detector which is designed for channels which have correlated and/or signal-dependent noise.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a method of determining branch metric values in a detector. The method includes receiving a plurality of time variant signal samples, the signal samples having one of signal-dependent noise, correlated noise, and both signal dependent and correlated noise associated therewith. The method also includes selecting a branch metric function at a certain time index and applying the selected function to the signal samples to determine the metric values.
The present invention represents a substantial advance over prior sequence detectors. Because the present invention takes into account the correlation between noise samples in the readback signal, the detected data sequence is detected with a higher degree of accuracy. Those advantages and benefits of the present invention, and others, will become apparent from the Detailed Description of the Invention hereinbelow.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5689532 (1997-11-01), Fitzpatrick
patent: 5737342 (1998-04-01), Ziperovich
patent: 5781590 (1998-07-01), Shiokawa et al.
patent: 5784415 (1998-07-01), Chevillat et al.
patent: 5844946 (1998-12-01), Nagayasu
patent: 5856983 (1999-01-01), Okazaki
patent: 5862192 (1999-01-01), Huszar et al.
patent: 5914988 (1999-06-01), Hu et al.
patent: 5920599 (1999-07-01), Igarashi
patent: 5937020 (1999-08-01), Hase et al.
patent: 5970091 (1999-10-01), Nishida et al.
patent: 5978426 (1999-11-01), Glover et al.
patent: 6005731 (1999-12-01), Foland, Jr. et al.
patent: 6104766 (2000-08-01), Coker et al.
patent: 6201839 (2001-03-01), Kavcic et al.
patent: 6215831 (2001-04-01), Nowack et al.
Nakagawa et al., “A Study on Detection Methods of NRZ Recording”, IEEE Trans. On Magnetics, vol. MAG-16, No. 1, pp. 104-10, Jan. 1980.
Chevillat et al., “Noise-Predictive Partial-Response Equalizers and Applications,” IEEE CC '92 Conference Record, pp. 942-947, Jun. 1992.
Zeng et al., “Modified Viterbi Algorithm for Jitter-dominant 1-D2Channel,” IEEE Trans. On Magnetics, vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 2895-2897, Sep. 1992.
Lee et al., “Performance Analysis of the Modified Maximum Likelihood Sequence Detector in the Presence of Data-dependent Noise”, Proceedings of the 26thAsilomar Conference, pp. 961-964, Oct. 1992.
Zayad et al., “Comparison of Equalization & Detection for Very High-Density Magnetic Recording,” IEEE Intermag Conference, Apr. 1997.
Bahl, et al., “Optimal Decoding of Linear Codes for Minimizng Symbol Error Rate,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, pp. 284-287, Mar. 1974.
Heegard et al., Turbo Coding, 1999, Kluwer Academc Publishers, pp. 121-164.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Soft and hard sequence detection in ISI memory channels does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Soft and hard sequence detection in ISI memory channels, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Soft and hard sequence detection in ISI memory channels will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2887671