Social choice determination systems and methods

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07962346

ABSTRACT:
A system configured for: (A) identifying a first party of a plurality of parties as one of an excluded group of parties; (B) identifying a candidate group that includes each of the plurality of parties other than the excluded group of parties; (C) receiving, from the first party, a first-party utility value that the first party would associate with at least one of a plurality of different outcomes; (D) receiving, from a second party, a second-party utility value that the second party would associate with at least one of the plurality of different outcomes, the second party being part of the candidate group; and (E) determining which particular one of the plurality of outcomes should be selected based primarily on a set of utility values that comprises the second-party utility value. Step (E) may be made without substantially considering the first-party utility value, and Step (B) may be made without substantially considering the first-party utility value.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6026383 (2000-02-01), Ausubel
patent: 6272473 (2001-08-01), Sandholm
patent: 7287007 (2007-10-01), Detering
patent: 2003/0018561 (2003-01-01), Kitchen et al.
patent: 2003/0041002 (2003-02-01), Hao et al.
patent: 1 054 336 (2000-11-01), None
Rina Dechter, “Constraint Processing”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
Nisan, Noam and Ronen, Amir, Computationally Feasible VCG Mechanisms, Article, School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Ephrati, Eithan and Rosenschein, Jeffrey S., The Clarke Tax as a Consensus Mechanism Among Automated Agents, pp. 73-178,. Computer Science Department, Hebrew University.
Herve Moulin, Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making (Econometric Society Monographs, No. 15), Book, 1988, Entire Book, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, New York.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Social choice determination systems and methods does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Social choice determination systems and methods, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Social choice determination systems and methods will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2626568

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.