Slip resistant mat

Details Slip resistant mat Slip resistant mat

2002-04-25

2003-12-02

Loney, Donald J. (Department: 1772)

Stock material or miscellaneous articles

Structurally defined web or sheet

Including fastener for attaching to external surface

C428S095000, C428S159000, C428S172000, C428S217000, C015S215000, C005S417000, C004S581000, C004S583000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06656562

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention relates generally to slip resistant, anti-skid or anti-creep mats.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the past, floor mats, consisting of rubber backed carpet tuft, were made with either a smooth back, primarily for solid or non carpeted floors, or with a variety of “grippers” or “cleats” arranged to reduce the movement on carpeted floors. However, both of these approaches resulted in floor mats that were not skid resistant on smooth floors, especially those floors with high traffic areas or loads being moved over them. The movement of the mat in the gripper/cleat mat design results from the force of foot and vehicle traffic on the mat which causes a deformation around the compressed area and then upon removal of such force the mat returns to a different position. For the smooth back mats, movement of the mat results from similar forces and the lack of any device or feature intended to secure the mat in place.
A number of approaches have been taken to attempt to reduce the movement of mats. One known approach to the problem is to fasten the mat to the intended surface by various devices, such as that suggested by Kessler in U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,908 which utilizes a system by which a mat is fastened to the surface using a clip system. While this approach is well-developed, it results in floor mats that are difficult or impossible to move from place to place and the structures required to attach the mat add cost to the mat and difficulty to the installation. Also, attached mats are more rigid.
Another approach involves the use of a frame into which the mat is placed, such as the frames used by Moffitt, Jr. in U.S. Pat. No. 4,361,614 and Kessler in U.S. Patent No. 6,042,915. The frame can be located upon the flooring surface or inlaid to be flush with the flooring surface. In either circumstance, unless the frame is fastened as mentioned above or embedded in the surface, the frame still has a tendency to shift on the surface. If the frame is fastened or embedded, the other problems mentioned above still remain.
Another approach involves the use of suction cups, such as those commonly found on shower and bath mats, examples of which can be found by Lindholm in U.S. Pat. No. 6,014,779 in which the corners of a rectangular mat are held by four suction cups and by Gavlak in U.S. Pat. No. 2,081,992 in which a plurality of suctions cups hold the bathtub mat to the surface. While this approach provides acceptable slip-resistance for light shower and bath mat applications, traditional suctions cups are not sufficient to provide sufficient anti-skidding forces to prevent slipping and movement in high traffic and high load areas. Traditional suction cups also result in a wavy mat surface which is more difficult for individuals and loads to traverse.
As mentioned, existing approaches to reducing movement of mats include significant limitations. Further, the known approaches require additional space, components, installation effort and expense. As a result, significant improvement can still be made relative to reducing the movement of mats.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The object of the present invention is to utilize recessions formed on the underside of the mat coupled with suction cups to reduce movement of the mat on the intended surface, typically floors. The present invention utilizes a plurality of recessions with partially inset suction cups to reduce the movement of the mat. The recessions have a suction cup set inside the recession and the top surface of the recession is connected with the top surface of the suction cup, either directly or by using a supporting pillar. Upon an initial force being applied to the mat, such as a footstep or vehicular traffic, the suction cup is deformed and the air is forced out of the suction cup which creates a low pressure area or near vacuum inside of the suction cup, thereby providing a force that acts to adhere the mat to the surface and assist in retaining the mat in its original position. As the force over a particular recession increases, if the force is sufficiently large, the suction cup will deform itself into the recession, and the recession itself will receive a compression force that will create a low pressure area or near vacuum inside the recession being impacted against the surface on which the mat rests. At the same time, as a result, the low pressure areas of both the recessions and suction cups then create forces that act to oppose the lateral motion of the mat that would otherwise result from the applied forces.
The size and shape specifications of the recessions and suction cups can be varied and they can be positioned in a variety of arrangements. The recessions can be any shape that is formed on the underside of the mat, does not extend through the top of the mat (i.e., is contained within the mat), and adjoins the floor in a continuous manner to permit the formation of a low pressure area or near vacuum. The suction cups are at least partially inset into the recessions and can be any shape provided that the edges of the suction cups contact the surface on which the mat rests prior to the full compression of the recessions. In one embodiment, the recessions are cylinders or recessed circles having a width of 2.5 cm and a depth of 0.125 cm, the circular pillar connecting the recessions and the suction cups has a width/diameter of 0.625 cm and a depth/thickness of 0.0802 cm, the suction cup and pillar have a cumulative depth of 0.375 cm from the top surface of the recession, and the suction cup has an inner depth of 0.20 cm, an edge to edge width of 1.62 cm, and a contacting surface lip width of 0.12 cm. Also, in one embodiment, the recessions are positioned in evenly spaced parallel and perpendicular rows resulting in an evenly spaced grid arrangement, although they can be spaced in an infinite number of combinations. In one embodiment, the pattern does not extend to the edge of the mat in order to prevent tearing and permit the edge of the mat to be uniformly thick. Further, in one embodiment, the top surfaces of the recessions are connected to the side surfaces of the recessions by an angled edge, which serves to add structural integrity to the mat and decrease the volume of the recessions, thereby decreasing the volume of air needing to be expelled to create a low pressure or near vacuum area and increasing the surface adhesion of the mat.
In another embodiment, the recessions and suction cups are different sizes and shapes. The existence of multiple sizes and shapes of recessions and suction cups permits improved performance on a variety of floor surfaces since larger recession an suction cup units perform better on some surfaces and smaller recessions and suction cup units perform better on others.
In another embodiment, the recessions and suction cups are formed in a base layer of material and then the base layer of material is laminated to one or more other top layers of material. While the layers can be made from different materials, the base layer and any intermediate layers are typically sheets of rubber and the uppermost of the top layers is a union of a rubber sheet with carpet, yarn or other fabric on top. The base layer can be formed from a soft, low durometer rubber compound, such as LD-35, by being plied to a T6 aluminum mold to form the recessions and the suction cups. This base layer is then laminated with one or more upper layers formed from Millennium Mat MM-170 rubber compound with the uppermost layer bonded with a yarn/carpet material. In this embodiment, after lamination of the layers, the laminated sheet is pricked to avoid the accretion of gases during the curing process. Also, if desired, additives can be introduced to the mat to make it anti-bacterial.
One advantage of the present invention is that the mat resists slipping to a much greater extent than existing mat designs. Another advantage of the invention is that the edges of the mat are more stable and therefore it is less of a tripping hazard or obstacle than traditional mats in which the edge of the mat easily rolls up

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Slip resistant mat does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Slip resistant mat, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Slip resistant mat will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3156122