Skeptical system

Information security – Monitoring or scanning of software or data including attack... – Vulnerability assessment

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C726S023000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07421738

ABSTRACT:
A skeptical system protects an asset by monitoring commands of a user, predicting a plan of the user based on the monitored commands, inferring an actual plan from the predicted plan, receiving information related to an identity of the user, inferring an actual identity of the user from the information, assessing a threat based on the actual plan and the actual user identity, and selecting, from among a plurality of possible responses, a response that is appropriate to the assessed threat.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5229764 (1993-07-01), Matchett et al.
patent: 5621889 (1997-04-01), Lermuzeaux et al.
patent: 6405318 (2002-06-01), Rowland
patent: 6742128 (2004-05-01), Joiner
patent: 2001/0001156 (2001-05-01), Leppek
patent: 2001/0054020 (2001-12-01), Barth et al.
patent: 2003/0005326 (2003-01-01), Flemming
Ha et al., “Balancing Safety Against Performance: Tradeoffs in Internet Security”, Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii Intl. Conference on System Sciences, Jan. 2003.
Goldman et al., “A Probabilistic Approach to Plan-recognition and Text Understanding Work in Progress”, Aug. 9, 1989, pp. 1-6.
Charniak et al., “A Bayesian model of plan recognition”, Artificial Intelligence 64 Elsevier (1993) pp. 53-79.
Kautz et al., “Generalized Plan Recognition”, Proceedings aaai-86, fifth national conference on artificial intelligence Aug. 11-15, 1986, vol. 1 Science, pgs. front page & 32-37.
Kautz, “A formal theory of plan recognition”, 1987, UMI.
Carberry, “Incorporating Default Inferences into Plan Recognition”, AAAI-90, Proceedings Eight National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, Jul. 29, 1990-Aug. 3, 1990, pgs. front page & 471-478.
Vilain, “Deduction as Parsing: Tractable Classification in the KL-ONE Framework”, AAAI-91, Proceedings Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, Jul. 14-19, 1991, pgs. front page & 464-467.
Gertner et al., “Procedural help in Andes: Generating hints using a Bayesian network student model”, Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1998, pgs. 106-111.
Horvitz et al., “A Computational Architecture for Conversation”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on User Modeling , 1999, pgs. 201-210.
Horvitz et al., “The Lumiére Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users”, Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1998, pp. 256-265.
Heckerman et al., “Inferring Informational Goals from Free-Text Queries: A Bayesian Approach”, Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1998, pp. 230-237.
Sidner, Plan parsing for intended response recognition in discourseI, Computational Intelligence, vol. 1, Jan. 10, 1985, pp. 1-10.
Kaminka et al., “Monitoring Deployed Agent Teams”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2001, pp. 308-315.
Pynadath et al., “Probabilistic State-Dependent Grammars for Plan Recognition”, Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2000, pp. 507-514.
Geib et al., “Probabilistic Plan Recognition for Hostile Agents”.
Carberry, “Incorporating Default Inferences into Plan Recognition”, AAAI-90, Proceedings Eight National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, Jul. 29, 1990-Aug. 3, 1990, pgs. front page & 471-478.
Vilain, “Deduction as Parsing: Tractable Classification in the KL-ONE Framework”, AAAI-91, Proceedings Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, Jul. 14-19, 1991, pgs. front page & 464-467.
Gertner et al., “Procedural help in Andes: Generating hints using a Bayesian network student model”, Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1998, pp. 106-111.
Horvitz et al., “A Computational Architecture for Conversation”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on User Modeling, 1999, pp. 201-210.
Horvitz et al., “The LumiéProject: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users”, Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1998, pp. 256-265.
Heckerman et al., “Inferring Informational Goals from Free-Text Queries: A Bayesian Approach”, Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1998, pp. 230-237.
Sidner, Plan parsing for intended response recognition in discourseI, Computational Intelligence, vol. 1, Jan. 10, 1985, pp. 1-10.
Kaminka et al., “Monitoring Deployed Agent Teams”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2001, pp. 308-315.
Pynadath et al., “Probabilistic State-Dependent Grammars for Plan Recognition”, Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2000, pp. 507-514.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Skeptical system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Skeptical system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Skeptical system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3969627

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.