Surgery: splint – brace – or bandage – Orthopedic bandage – Splint or brace
Reexamination Certificate
2000-10-23
2003-05-20
Brown, Michael A. (Department: 3764)
Surgery: splint, brace, or bandage
Orthopedic bandage
Splint or brace
C602S026000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06565523
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to knee braces and more particularly to a single jointed knee brace providing supported movement about the true flexion/extension axis.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The human knee joint is one of the most stressed joints of the human body. In normal activities such as walking, running, kneeling, and climbing stairs, the load put on the knee joint can easily exceed five times the weight of the body, and for those who engage in more strenuous activities, can be much higher. Those who have experienced knee trauma are often treated by relieving pressure from the knee joint using a knee brace. Knee braces are sometimes used for short periods of time during which recovery is expected and sometimes for extended periods of time, for example, when chronic knee problems exist.
Typically, a knee brace comprises a strut for fastening to the thigh, a strut for fastening to the lower leg and a hinge axis positioned therebetween so as to reinforce a knee and to limit the range of movement. Many straps, cuffs or other securing systems for securing the knee brace to the leg are described and illustrated in the prior art.
However, regardless of the type of knee brace design, the medical community and designers of knee prosthetic and orthotic devices have long believed that the movement of the knee joint in flexion and extension does not take place in a simple hinge-like manner. Rather, it has heretofore been universally accepted that flexion and extension knee movement includes displacement and rotation, so that the same parts of a first articulating surface (the condyles of the femur) are not always in contact with the same part of a second corresponding articulating surface (the tibial plateau) with the axis of motion not being fixed. Thus, it has been believed that the knee acts not as a simple hinge joint, but turns in extension and flexion through an infinite succession of uniquely placed centres of rotation, each centre acting at a particular relative orientation of the femur and the tibia. As such, knee orthoses are provided with means for allowing the knee to rotate about the axes of rotation previously thought to exist. Some methods of accommodating the varying axes of flexion and extension include providing the joint with some lateral movement and providing complex hinge mechanisms for a knee brace.
As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,133,758 issued in 1992, Hollister has shown that the knee has a fixed flexion/extension axis through all degrees of flexion and extension movement of the knee. The fixed flexion/extension axis is directed inferiorly and posteriorly from the medial condyle portion to the lateral condyle portion and is offset from both the transverse and coronal planes equally by approximately 3.0 to 3.8 degrees.
Knee braces, however, continue to be flawed by trying to provide flexion/extension about varying axes of the previous model.
Two distinct forms of knee brace are commonly used: light support braces, providing support only to the outside of the knee, having small size, low weight, and low strength, and heavier weight bearing knee braces having more bulk, more weight, and greater strength. The required support and strength dictate the required brace. The constant force of conflicting brace hinged axis against the true flexion/extension axis increases the strength needed in prior art braces to provide stable support.
Some knee braces include compound hinges to accommodate the believed varying axes. Such compound hinges include two or more pivot points closely spaced along the natural joint defined by the knee. Examples of such compound hinges include Lerman U.S. Pat. No. 4,372,298; Marquette U.S. Pat. No. 4,793,333; Kausek et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,732,143; and European Patent Application 0173161 in the name of Townsend.
Additional complex pivotal motion is introduced as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,586,970 issued to Morris, and U.S. Pat. No. RE 34818 issued to Daneman, which include additional pivotal motion of pads within the brace structure.
Many braces rely on a simple hinge axis rigidly braced with respect to the knee. Examples of such devices include Ford U.S. Pat. No. 4,624,247; Martin et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,503,846 and Myers et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,802,466. However, without providing hinged movement about the true flexion/extension axis there is a tendency for some knee braces to “piston” with respect to the leg. The brace slides up and down the upper portion of the leg, causing irritation and discomfort. Such piston movement can be accommodated by various springs or telescoping linkages between the respective knee brace portions. Illustrative of such arrangements are British Patent Application 2,156,221 in the name of Carsalade, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,190 in the name of Fischer.
Unfortunately, the more supportive weight bearing knee braces which include a hinge and supporting struts on the medial and lateral sides of the knee, often have the following shortcomings: they are bulky, difficult to install or “put on,” heavy and less comfortable than similar single hinged knee braces. In many cases, such a brace causes damage to clothing, fatigue, difficulty in walking with a normal gait, and generally restricted mobility. Further, compound joint knee braces are difficult to adjust in order to increase comfort and orthopedic value.
The use of light support single hinge knee braces is also known. Most single hinge knee braces are designed for portability and more specifically, for lightweight applications. Essentially, the amount of support provided by single hinge knee braces is often quite limited as the brace is easily deformed.
OBJECT OF THE INVENTION
In an attempt to overcome these and other limitations of the prior art, it is an object of the present invention to provide a single joint knee brace that provides increased strength and support while retaining many of the advantages inherent in single joint braces.
It is a further object to provide a knee brace that is comfortable and that rotates about a natural axis of rotation of the knee.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It has been found that by providing a brace structure which permits flexion/extension at the true flexion/extension axis, weight bearing support can be provided to the knee with a lighter more comfortable single hinge brace.
In accordance with the invention there is provided a single joint, weight bearing knee brace having a fixed flexion-extension axis of rotation comprising:
an upper portion for mounting to a portion of a leg above the knee;
a lower portion for mounting to a portion of a leg below the knee;
a single joint hingedly connecting the upper portion and the lower portion and having a substantially fixed flexion-extension axis,
said single joint comprising:
a first portion and a second portion interconnected for rotational movement about a hinge axis, the first portion and the second portion including interconnecting elements for securing the joint and for supporting rotational movement about the hinge axis, the interconnecting elements comprising a projecting cylindrical element having a cylindrical sleeve bearing surface for securing the joint and for supporting sliding rotational movement about the hinge axis and a cylindrical opening having a cylindrical sleeve bearing surface for receiving the projecting cylindrical element;
the first portion and the second portion further including cooperating sleeve bearing surfaces angularly disposed to the hinge axis for supporting sliding rotational movement about the hinge axis and for receiving forces in any of three dimensions and moments about any two of three coordinates having a different orientation than the hinge axis;
at least one of the first portion and the second portion further including mounting means for maintaining the fixed flexion-extension axis between 2.5 to 4 degrees posterior to the coronal plane from the medial condyle portion to the lateral condyle portion, to position the fixed flexion-extension axis approximately coaxial with the fixed flexion-extension axis of the knee.
Brown Michael A.
Freedman & Associates
LandOfFree
Single jointed knee brace does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Single jointed knee brace, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Single jointed knee brace will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3011692