Communications: radio wave antennas – Antennas – Loop type
Reexamination Certificate
2001-01-02
2002-08-20
Wong, Don (Department: 2821)
Communications: radio wave antennas
Antennas
Loop type
C343S741000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06437756
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to electromagnetic energy radiation and reception using a single element antenna, and especially relates to electromagnetic energy radiation and reception with a single element antenna effected using impulse radio energy. Still more particularly the present invention provides a single element antenna suited for broadband energy radiation and reception, and particularly well suited for broadband energy radiation and reception employing impulse radio energy.
2. Related Art
Recent advances in communications technology have enabled an emerging revolutionary ultra wideband technology (UWB) called impulse radio communications systems (hereinafter called impulse radio).
Impulse radio was first fully described in a series of patents, including U.S. Pat. No. 4,641,317 (issued Feb. 3, 1987), U.S. Pat. No. 4,813,057 (issued Mar. 14, 1989), U.S. Pat. No. 4,979,186 (issued Dec. 18, 1990) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,363,108 (issued Nov. 8, 1994) to Larry W. Fullerton. A second generation of impulse radio patents include U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,927 (issued Oct. 14, 1997) to Fullerton et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,687,169 (issued Nov. 11, 1997) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,832,035 (issued Nov. 3, 1998) to Fullerton. These patent documents are incorporated herein by reference.
Uses of impulse radio systems are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/332,502, entitled, “System and Method for Intrusion Detection Using a Time Domain Radar Array, ” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/332,503, entitled, “Wide Area Time Domain Radar Array, ” both filed Jun. 14, 1999, both of which are assigned to the assignee of the present invention, and both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Basic impulse radio transmitters emit short pulses approaching a Gaussian monocycle with tightly controlled pulse-to-pulse intervals. Impulse radio systems typically use pulse position modulation, which is a form of time modulation where the value of each instantaneous sample of a modulating signal is caused to modulate the position of a pulse in time.
For impulse radio communications, the pulse-to-pulse interval is varied on a pulse-by-pulse basis by two components: an information component and a pseudo-random code component. Unlike direct sequence spread spectrum systems, the pseudo-random code for impulse radio communications is not necessary for energy spreading because the monocycle pulses themselves have an inherently wide bandwidth. Instead, the pseudo-random code of an impulse radio system is used for channelization, energy smoothing in the frequency domain and for interference suppression.
Generally speaking, an impulse radio receiver is a direct conversion receiver with a cross correlator front end. The front end coherently converts an electromagnetic pulse train of monocycle pulses to a baseband signal in a single stage. The data rate of the impulse radio transmission is typically a fraction of the periodic timing signal used as a time base. Because each data bit modulates the time position of many pulses of the periodic timing signal, this yields a modulated, coded timing signal that comprises a train of identically shaped pulses for each single data bit. The impulse radio receiver integrates multiple pulses to recover the transmitted information.
In a multi-user environment, impulse radio depends, in part, on processing gain to achieve rejection of unwanted signals. Because of the extremely high processing gain achievable with impulse radio, much higher dynamic ranges are possible than are commonly achieved with other spread spectrum methods, some of which must use power control in order to have a viable system. Further, if power is kept to a minimum in an impulse radio system, this will allow closer operation in co-site or nearly co-site situations where two impulse radios must operate concurrently, or where an impulse radio and a narrow band radio must operate close by one another and share the same band.
Many applications for impulse radio technology, including communication applications, position determination applications, locating (e.g., radar) applications and other applications require lightweight, compact broadband antennas with broad beam transmit/receive characteristics. As with any antenna, impedance matching to feed elements is necessary for efficient operation. Moreover, in the case of impulse radio technology applications, the antenna must not be subject to ringing in response to application of pulses—either in a transmit mode or in a receive mode.
Current antenna technology offers several undesirable alternatives to one interested in a small, well-matched, efficient, broad beam ultra wideband (UWB) short pulse antenna: (1) a self-similar antenna (e.g., a spiral antenna) that tends to be large and frequency dispersive; (2) a TEM horn antenna that tends to be bulky and highly directive; or (3) a resistively loaded antenna that will necessarily be lossy and inefficient.
The current art regarding ultra wideband (UWB) antennas teaches using element antennas such as monopoles, dipoles, conical antennas and bow-tie antennas for ultra wideband systems. However, they are generally characterized by low directivity and relatively limited bandwidth unless either end loading or distributed loading techniques are employed, in which case bandwidth is increased at the expense of radiation efficiency.
Conventional antennas are designed to radiate only over the relatively narrow range of frequencies used in conventional narrow band systems. Such narrow band systems may, for example, employ fractional bandwidths no more than about 25%. If an impulse signal, such as a signal of the sort employed for impulse radio purposes, is fed to such a narrow band antenna, the antenna tends to ring. Ringing severely distorts signal pulses and spreads them out in time. Impulse radio signals are preferably modulated by pulse timing, so such distortion of pulses is not desirable.
Broadband antennas are advantageous for many purposes, including their use with impulse radio systems. Conventional design in broadband antennas follows a commonly accepted principle that the impedance and pattern properties of an antenna will be frequency independent if the antenna shape is specified only in terms of angles. That is to say, a self-similar or self-complimentary antenna will be a broadband antenna. This principle explains known broadband antennas like biconical and bow tie antennas, but also applies to other broadband antennas like log periodic, log spiral, and conical spiral antennas.
All such prior art antennas rely on a variation of scale to achieve their broadband performance. A “smaller” scale section of the antenna radiates higher frequency components while a “larger” scale section of the antenna radiates lower frequency components. Because the radiation centers change location as a function of frequency, these antennas are inherently frequency dispersive; they radiate different frequency components from different parts of the antenna, resulting in a distorted impulse signal.
Throughout this description, it should be kept in mind that discussions relating to transmitting or transmissions apply with equal veracity to reception of electromagnetic energy or signals. In order to avoid prolixity, the present description will focus primarily on transmission characteristics of antennas, with the proviso that it is understood that reception of energy or signals is also inherently described.
A biconical antenna is a classic example of a prior art broadband antenna with an omni-directional pattern. A typical biconical antenna with a 60° half angle will have a 100&OHgr; input with a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of <2:1 over a 6:1 bandwidth. A significant drawback with such a biconical antenna is that such an antenna is typically implemented with a diameter equal to the wavelength at the lower frequency limit (&lgr;
L
), thus requiring that the antenna be 0.577&lgr;
L
in height. Because of similar design limitations, a typical monocone antenna
Chen Shih-Ihao
Law Office of Donald D. Mondul
Time Domain Corporation
Wong Don
LandOfFree
Single element antenna apparatus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Single element antenna apparatus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Single element antenna apparatus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2927933