Sign-cross product automatic frequency control loop

Details Sign-cross product automatic frequency control loop Sign-cross product automatic frequency control loop

1998-12-16

2001-10-16

Pham, Chi (Department: 2631)

Pulse or digital communications

Receivers

Automatic frequency control

C455S257000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06304620

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to an automatic frequency control (AFC) circuit used to match the frequency of a signal receiver to that of a signal transmitter, and more particularly to sign-cross product frequency control circuits.
2. Discussion of the Background Art
An automatic frequency control (AFC) frequency locked loop is used primarily to match the frequency of a signal receiver to that of a signal transmitter. In coherent demodulation, a phase locked loop (PLL) is typically used to estimate both the frequency and phase error. “Phase” is used to mean the constant modulation phase, which is assumed to be constant over a period of time much longer than the period of the carrier signal. A conventional PLL receiver circuit maintains its synchronization by comparing and adjusting its internal clock signal to received clock signals. In an analog PLL, the internal and received clock signals are supplied to a comparator, which produces a voltage output pulse proportional to the phase differences of the clock signals. Each output pulse is integrated to produce a voltage, which is applied to a voltage-controlled oscillator to produce a phase locked receiver clock signal. Preferably, the phase error is driven to a small value and the voltage-controlled oscillator's frequency is kept equal to the input frequency.
However, PLLs typically have a narrow pull-in range centered about the receiver clock frequency and therefore during acquisition, and in the presence of large frequency errors, the performance of the PLL is very poor. For reliable operation, conventional PLL circuits must employ acquisition-aid circuitry, which unfortunately can represent as much as half of the total circuitry required for clock recovery. This is costly in terms of implementing a circuit on IC chips, where production cost is proportional to chip area.
An AFC can be used to estimate the frequency as an aid to the PLL during acquisition, as discussed by H. Meyr and G. Ascheid in
Synchronization in Digital Communications,
Wiley: New York, N.Y., 1990. Several types of AFC circuits are available in various implementations of circuit performance and circuit complexity, but high performance cross-product AFC circuits are particularly suitable for telephone communication applications. Cross-product AFC circuits are discussed by F. Natali in “Noise Performance of Cross-Product AFC with Decision Feedback for DPSK signals,”
IEEE Trans. Communications,
vol. 34, pp. 303-307, March 1986; by F. Gardner in “Properties of Frequency Difference Detectors,”
IEEE Trans. Communications,
vol. 33, pp. 131-138, February 1985; and by F. Natali in “AFC Tracking Algorithms,”
IEEE Trans. Communications,
vol. 32, pp. 935-947, August 1986.
One type of AFC circuit used primarily to match the frequency of a signal receiver to that of a signal transmitter in telephone communication applications is a differentiator AFC, where the unknown frequency offset is obtained through differentiation.
A major problem encountered by wireless communication cellular telephone systems is destructive interference in the received radio signal from multi-path radio signals that are reflected from terrestrial obstructions such as buildings and moving vehicles. This causes the received radio signal to appear as the sum of the direct line-of-sight fundamental signal plus the signal reflections with different amounts of attenuation and delay.
The RAKE concept for combining multi-path radio signals was first described and published in 1958, but RAKE receivers are more thoroughly discussed in
Digital Communications
by Proakis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1995. A RAKE receiver consists of a bank of correlators matched to a spreading code used to perform the transmitter's CDMA modulation of the information. With a good choice of spreading codes, each delay path can be independently demodulated by a separate branch circuit or “finger” of the RAKE receiver. After each “finger” demodulates a separate reflection of the transmitted signal, these properly processed signals become carriers of additional information which are constructively combined to increase the overall Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of the received radio signal.
A RAKE receiver is more suitable than a conventional receiver for receiving and processing reflected multi-path radio signals and thus RAKE receivers are commonly implemented in cellular telephone receivers, especially in US code division multiple access (CDMA) cellular telephone receivers. Multi-path signal reflections can result in different velocities of relative movement between the receiver and each reflective object providing a path for the radio signal reflection, and each reflected radio signal's frequency as seen by the receiver will be either increased or decreased by a Doppler shift. This physical phenomenon is manifested in everyday life by the change in tone of a vehicle's siren as it approaches and then leaves a listener. Therefore, the RAKE receiver should ideally also compensate for the Doppler shift on each reflection of the transmitted signal.
During the acquisition stage, the mismatch between the received signal frequency and the local oscillator typically can be up to 6 KHz. At this stage, only one dedicated AFC detector can be used to correct for the frequency mismatch. During steady state, all AFC detectors in the various RAKE fingers become active and attempt to track the various Doppler shift frequencies due to each multi-path reflection.
Sign-cross-product AFC circuits work well in RAKE receivers used for cellular telephone applications. During steady state, the relative speed between the mobile station and the base station (or several base stations during handoffs) causes different random frequency modulations due to Doppler shifts on the various multi-path signals. The Doppler shifts are positive or negative depending on whether the mobile station is moving toward or away from the base station. Furthermore, objects moving in the mobile station's vicinity cause a time-varying Doppler shift in the multi-path channel.
The application of the sign-cross-product AFC algorithm is illustrated by a mobile station moving at a constant velocity v. The apparent change in frequency, or Doppler shift, is given by
f
d
=
v
λ
⁢
cos
⁢
 
⁢
θ
(
1
)
where &lgr; is the free space wavelength of the radio signal and &thgr; is the spatial angle between the direction of motion of the mobile station and the multi-path waves impinging on the antenna. As the mobile station moves towards the propagating multi-path wave, the Doppler shift is positive and the apparent frequency increases. Conversely, as the mobile station moves away from the propagating multi-path wave, the Doppler shift is negative and the apparent frequency decreases.
After acquisition, the received signal is filtered and mixed to base-band (zero IF) by demodulating the carrier frequency from the received waves. This process, however, does not remove the Doppler frequency shift (or offset) from the received signal. The presence of a Doppler frequency offset in the signal path can significantly degrade the performance of the radio receiver. An algorithm such as the sign-cross-product AFC algorithm can be employed to remove the unwanted frequency offset.
There are several levels of complexity in differentiator AFC circuits for RAKE receiver applications. In a balanced discrete quadricorrelator AFC loop, henceforth referred to as an AFC loop, the unknown frequency offset is obtained through differentiation. Referring to
FIG. 1
, the optimal phase estimator
100
structure conventionally comprises multipliers
102
and
104
, integrators
106
and
108
and an arctangent function
110
. The received signal y(t) can be expressed as
y
(
t
)
=A
sin[{overscore (&ohgr;)}
t
+(&ohgr;−{overscore (&ohgr;)})
t+&thgr;]+n
(
t
)  (2)
where {overscore (&ohgr;)} is the frequency of the local oscillator (not shown) and A is a time-varying

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Sign-cross product automatic frequency control loop does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Sign-cross product automatic frequency control loop, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Sign-cross product automatic frequency control loop will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2610921