Telecommunications – Carrier wave repeater or relay system – Portable or mobile repeater
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-20
2004-05-04
Maung, Nay (Department: 2681)
Telecommunications
Carrier wave repeater or relay system
Portable or mobile repeater
C455S013100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06731904
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Repeater systems are typically used where the area to be covered and/or capacity requirements do not justify the installation of a full Cellular/PCS base station with managed frequency-channel allocation. Thus, as shown in
FIG. 1
, tower-mounted repeater systems are often used to extend the range of a cell site, to provide null fill in regions that are RF blocked, such as by hills or trees, and/or to provide enhanced “in-building”coverage, via directing the signal power to the desired structures, such as a building
30
.
The typical repeater system comprises three basic parts shown in FIG.
2
and FIG.
3
: the link antenna
22
which is directed/aimed at the wireless base station (BS); the amplifying electronics “box”
24
, and the broadcast antenna
26
—which is directed towards the area of interest. Often, the link antenna
22
is highly directive (high gain) with a very narrow beam, since it only needs to “see” the base station. The broadcast antenna
26
is more defined by the beamwidth necessary to cover the intended area. The electronics box
24
may contain an assortment of diplexers, filters, splitters, and RF amplifiers.
Two of the main performance factors on which a system is based are gain and output power. The output power is mostly determined by the sum of the two passive antenna (link and broadcast) gains and the maximum (linear) output power of the amplifier(s). The system gain is determined by the sum of the passive antenna gains, plus the gain of the amplifier stage. This is limited by the isolation (or mutual coupling) between the two (broadcast and link) antennas. The isolation depends on the antenna type, front to back (F/B) ratio and beamwidth.
For example, assume two opposing antennas, each with 20 dB directivity. Further, assume a F/B ratio of about 25 dB. The isolation between antennas is therefore about 50 dB, which is the sum of the two F/B ratios (25 dB+25 dB). To keep the amplifiers from oscillating, a safety factor of about 20 dB is recommended, which translates to an active (amplifier) gain to about 30 dB (50−20). However, the total system gain is the sum of the passive gains (directivity) plus the active gain, which, in this example, is 20+20+30=70 dB.
Normally, a well designed antenna should have a front to back ratio (F/B) better than 20 dB. For very high gain antennas, the F/B can be as high as 40 dB. However, as the F/B is increased, so typically is the directivity; which means that the antenna's beamwidth is narrowed. For repeater applications, this might prove disadvantageous, since the coverage area (sector width) is reduced.
Orientation and separation distance of the antennas is also a factor. In the near field, the propagation path loss is proportional to 1/R, where R is the radius or distance between the two antennas (note, it is 1/R
2
for the far field). Thus, for two PCS antennas, back to back, seperated by about 10 feet, the propagation loss is about 24 dB. This therefore increases the isolation between the two antennas by 24 dB. However, it is now much harder to accurately orient the antennas, so that they are truly in-line, maximizing their F/B ratio isolation.
This is a significant issue for most operators (customers). Aligning the two antennas, such that they are exactly opposing (one pointed 180 degrees away from the other), can be extremely difficult and time consuming.
Existing indoor repeater systems, typically employ a separate link antenna
32
, either on the roof, or on the side of a building (FIG.
4
). The RF power is routed to the electronics portion of the repeater via a coaxial cable
34
, often with an amplifier stage (not shown) in between. The indoor RF distribution system is either one or more antennas
36
, or some other RF emission/reception mechanism, such as radiax (leaky wave) cable, or RF stripline cable
38
. The labor for installing these indoor radiation systems (antennas or leaky wave cables) is usually intensive and costly. Additionally, since propagation characteristics inside a building are complex to estimate, or model, multiple radiators are usually used to assure adequate coverage to all portions of the building.
Existing repeater systems, mostly for outdoor use, use physically separate antennas (i.e., physically separate from the amplifier/electronics module/box), one pointed towards the wireless base station, and the other pointed towards the (broadcast) area of interest. This requires mounting/installation of three different units, and labor intensive orientation of the two antennas to maximize the RF isolation, to achieve maximum system gain.
Similar to the outdoor repeater system(s), indoor repeaters require accurate orientation (labor intensive) between the two antennas to insure maximum RF isolation, and to prevent signal feedBack and therefore “ringing” in the circuit.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A modular repeater comprises a housing having a pair of substantially 180° oppositely facing surfaces, at least one antenna element mounted to each of said surfaces for radiating energy in a direction opposite to that of an antenna element mounted to the other of said surfaces, and an electronic circuit mounted within said housing and operatively coupling signals between at least one antenna element on each of said oppositely facing surfaces of said module.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3728733 (1973-04-01), Robinson
patent: 3731315 (1973-05-01), Sheleg
patent: 4032922 (1977-06-01), Provencher
patent: 4041389 (1977-08-01), Oades
patent: 4099036 (1978-07-01), Migeon
patent: 4189675 (1980-02-01), Rielly et al.
patent: 4198600 (1980-04-01), Oguchi et al.
patent: 4246585 (1981-01-01), Mailloux
patent: 4317217 (1982-02-01), Davidson et al.
patent: 4318104 (1982-03-01), Enein
patent: 4338605 (1982-07-01), Mims
patent: 4352202 (1982-09-01), Carney
patent: 4407001 (1983-09-01), Schmidt
patent: 4446463 (1984-05-01), Irzinski
patent: 4701935 (1987-10-01), Namiki
patent: 4727590 (1988-02-01), Kawano et al.
patent: 4777652 (1988-10-01), Stolarczyk
patent: 4789993 (1988-12-01), Ryu
patent: 4843402 (1989-06-01), Clement
patent: 4849763 (1989-07-01), DuFort
patent: 4849963 (1989-07-01), Kawano et al.
patent: 4879711 (1989-11-01), Rosen
patent: 4973971 (1990-11-01), Sinsky et al.
patent: 4980665 (1990-12-01), Schotz
patent: 4994813 (1991-02-01), Shiramatsu et al.
patent: 5019793 (1991-05-01), McNab
patent: 5054120 (1991-10-01), Ushiyama et al.
patent: 5086302 (1992-02-01), Miller
patent: 5089823 (1992-02-01), Vasile
patent: 5115514 (1992-05-01), Leslie
patent: 5128687 (1992-07-01), Fay
patent: 5241410 (1993-08-01), Streck et al.
patent: 5321412 (1994-06-01), Kopp et al.
patent: 5349694 (1994-09-01), Kawano et al.
patent: 5351060 (1994-09-01), Bayne
patent: 5392054 (1995-02-01), Bottomley et al.
patent: 5444864 (1995-08-01), Smith
patent: 5463401 (1995-10-01), Iwasaki
patent: 5485170 (1996-01-01), McCarrick
patent: 5486835 (1996-01-01), Hock
patent: 5512906 (1996-04-01), Speciale
patent: 5587715 (1996-12-01), Lewis
patent: 5589843 (1996-12-01), Meredith et al.
patent: 5600333 (1997-02-01), Justice et al.
patent: 5633647 (1997-05-01), Tines
patent: 5663736 (1997-09-01), Webb et al.
patent: 5754138 (1998-05-01), Turcotte et al.
patent: 5754139 (1998-05-01), Turcotte et al.
patent: 5758287 (1998-05-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5767807 (1998-06-01), Pritchett
patent: 5805113 (1998-09-01), Ogino et al.
patent: 5832365 (1998-11-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5835848 (1998-11-01), Bi et al.
patent: 5856804 (1999-01-01), Turcotte et al.
patent: 5937332 (1999-08-01), Karabinis
patent: 5943618 (1999-08-01), Jackson et al.
patent: 5963847 (1999-10-01), Ito et al.
patent: 6029048 (2000-02-01), Treatch
patent: 6043790 (2000-03-01), Derneryd et al.
patent: 6049315 (2000-04-01), Meyer
patent: 6078787 (2000-06-01), Schefte et al.
patent: 6125109 (2000-09-01), Fuerter
patent: 6128471 (2000-10-01), Quelch et al.
patent: 6128557 (2000-10-01), Fenton et al.
patent: 6198460 (2001-03-01), Brankovic
patent: 6256484 (2001-07-01), Conner et al.
patent: 6285878 (2001-09-01), Lai
patent: 6348986 (20
Andrew Corporation
Gelin Jean A
Maung Nay
Wood Herron & Evans L.L.P.
LandOfFree
Side-to-side repeater does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Side-to-side repeater, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Side-to-side repeater will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3256696