Communications: electrical – Condition responsive indicating system – Specific condition
Reexamination Certificate
2000-03-02
2001-08-07
Tong, Nina (Department: 2632)
Communications: electrical
Condition responsive indicating system
Specific condition
C188S001120, C188S019000, C280S033994
Reexamination Certificate
active
06271755
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to theft-thwarting devices to help prevent the loss of shopping carts from shopping stores. The invention disables operation of the front wheels of the cart as well as the rear wheels, and keeps the cart from being pushed out of the parking lot once the front wheels of the cart are disabled.
2. Description of Related Art
Millions of dollars are lost each year by grocery stores and shopping marts as a result of shopping cart theft. The expenses associated with shopping cart theft include cart replacement (with typical costs ranging from $55 to $85 per cart) and costs for retrieval of carts taken off the premises.
In applicants' co-pending application, a shopping cart having novel anti-theft features was disclosed and claimed. In particular, the invention in that application addressed the problem of improper removal of shopping carts from the store's premises, and proposed as a solution a disabling apparatus comprising a combination of structural features borne by the basket supporting frame of the cart to render the cart's wheels inoperative upon actuation of the disabling apparatus. The object of the invention was to make it extremely difficult for a person having the intent to remove the cart from the store's premises by rolling it away.
The present invention is drawn to improvements over the previously presented subject matter, and incorporates additional shopping cart theft thwarting features. One major objective of the present invention is to defeat shopping cart theft attempts where the wheels of the shopping cart have been disabled but the thief still tries to remove the cart from the premises by tipping the cart so that the disabled wheels are removed from contact with the ground. In this way, the thief can then wheel the cart away on two wheels.
In response to the obvious need for a theft proof cart, several types of anti-theft devices for shopping carts have previously been developed. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,717,225 to Rashbaum (1973) discloses a piston rod and wheel lock device. This device includes a frame mounted actuator that locks one of the wheels of the cart. It does not eliminate the potential for the use of one bank of cart wheels rotating by lifting the disabled wheel from the contact with the ground. U.S. Pat. No. 5,315,290 to Moreno (1994) discloses an electronic wheel lock device. This device also fails to eliminate the possibility of leaning the cart to the side of the still active wheels. U.S. Pat. No. 4,2422,668 to Herzog (1980) discloses a collapsible sub frame causing the wheels to swing out of operative position. This device immobilizes the front wheels of the cart, but does not eliminate the possibility the cart can be leaned back, and rolled away using the rear wheels of the cart. U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,182 to Wolfe et al. (1994) discloses a braked wheel device. This device also fails to eliminate the possibility of leaning the cart to the side of the still active wheels once the cart has left the boundary of the parking lot. U.S. Pat. No. 4,524,985 to Drake (1985) discloses an arrest device for a wheeled cart, which relies on a hooking device in the parking lot, but does not appear to eliminate the possibility that the cart could be leaned to one side to avoid the hooking device. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,576,691 to Coaklet et al. (1996) discloses another form of a wheel locking device that also fails to prevent the removal of the cart by a user who can simply tip the cart onto its back wheels and roll the cart away. U.S. Pat. No. 4,577.880 to Bianco (1986) discloses still another form of a wheel locking device that fails to eliminate the removal of the cart by simply tipping the cart on to the back wheels and rolling the cart away. U.S. Pat. No. 4,772,880 to Goldstein (1988) discloses another form of the wheel locking device, disabling only one of the front wheels. U.S. Pat. No. 5,194,844 to Zelda (1993) discloses a proximity wheel locking mechanism. This device also fails to eliminate the removal of the cart by simply tipping the cart on to the back wheels and rolling the cart away. U.S. Pat. No. 4,591,175 to Upton (1986) discloses a magnetic wheel locking mechanism. This device also fails to eliminate the removal of the cart by simply tipping the cart on to the back wheels and rolling the cart away.
Many of the devices disclosed by these patents demonstrate that disabling only one wheel of a shopping cart is insufficient to completely immobilize the cart, for even if one wheel is disabled, the person removing the cart can continue to push the cart with sufficient force to override the traction of the locked wheel. Moreover, a shopping cart of the Herzog design, in which the two wheels of the front wheel assembly were disabled by allowing the sub frame of the cart to collapse around the front wheel assembly, failed to prevent the leaning of the cart backwards over, and rolling it away on, its rear wheels.
None of these previously known devices totally disables the cart. If one wheel is locked, a person intent on removing the cart from the premises can exert enough force to overcome the friction of the locked wheel. None of the devices heretofore known can prevent all the wheels of the cart from being disabled. If two wheels are disabled, as is taught by the Herzog patent, the cart can still be maneuvered by tilting the cart so that it can still be rolled away.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is a principal object of the present invention to provide for a shopping cart disabling assembly which will thwart the removal of the cart from the shopping market's premises by preventing the cart from being rolled away from the premises.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a pair of redundant wheels on the shopping cart that work, in conjunction with the disabling assembly when it is actuated, to limit the range of motion in a forward pushing direction to purely circular motion.
Another object is to provide a shopping cart disabling assembly which can conveniently and easily be reset by any employee of the shopping market.
Still another object is to provide a set of non-swiveling casters fixed to the front of the frame of the cart that, when the forward wheels of the cart are disabled and the cart collapses, support the weight of the cart when the non-swiveling casters engage the ground, and thus prevent the cart from being pushed forward, the non-swiveling casters being oriented parallel to one another and at an angle to the sides of the cart frame, thereby causing the cart to roll around in a circle.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide stop dogs affixed on rear casters which will prevent rotation of the rear casters and stop forward motion of the cart when the front of the cart is elevated off the ground in an attempt to defeat the front wheel disabling device of the invention.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide a collapsible front wheel assemby for a shopping cart in which disablement of the front wheel assembly is triggered by a radio frequency signal emitted from an underground cable.
Still another object is to provide as great a deterrent to a would be thief whose object it is to remove the shopping cart, so that the only way the thief could remove the cart from the parking lot would be to physically carry the cart away.
Still another object of the invention is to provide a front wheel assembly on a shopping cart that includes fixed-direction casters attached to the frame of the cart and swiveling casters attached to a collapsible suspension, wherein when the collapsible suspension becomes disabled and non-functional, the wheels of the fixed casters absorb the weight of the cart and redirect the momentum of the cart to purely circular motion.
These and other objectives are accomplished by the present invention which includes a first, collapsible, front suspension assembly for use with a shopping cart and a second, forward motion defeating, suspension assembly mounted to the cart forwardly o
Duffy Harold
Maandag Patrick
Orozco Miguel
Prather James G.
Lewis Terrell P.
Tong Nina
LandOfFree
Shopping cart with improved theft disabling device does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Shopping cart with improved theft disabling device, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Shopping cart with improved theft disabling device will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2504486