Active solid-state devices (e.g. – transistors – solid-state diode – Incoherent light emitter structure – With housing or contact structure
Reexamination Certificate
2001-05-15
2002-09-24
Lebentritt, Michael S. (Department: 2826)
Active solid-state devices (e.g., transistors, solid-state diode
Incoherent light emitter structure
With housing or contact structure
C257S103000, C257S668000, C257S693000, C257S201000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06455878
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
Semiconductor light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are among the most efficient light sources currently available. Materials systems currently of interest in the manufacture of high-brightness LEDs capable of operation across the visible spectrum include Group Ill-V semiconductors, particularly binary, ternary, and quaternary alloys of gallium, aluminum, indium, and nitrogen, also referred to as III-nitride materials. Typically, III-nitride devices are epitaxially grown on sapphire, silicon carbide, or III-nitride substrates by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), or other epitaxial techniques. Some of these substrates are insulating or poorly conducting. Devices fabricated from semiconductor crystals grown on such substrates must have both the positive and the negative polarity electrical contacts to the epitaxially-grown semiconductor on the same side of the device. In contrast, semiconductor devices grown on conducting substrates can be fabricated such that one electrical contact is formed on the epitaxially grown material and the other electrical contact is formed on the substrate. However, devices fabricated on conducting substrates may also be designed to have both contacts on the same side of the device on which the epitaxial material is grown in a flip-chip geometry so as to improve light extraction from LED chip, to improve the current-carrying capacity of the chip, or to improve the heat-sinking of the LED die.
In order to fabricate efficient LED devices, the contacts must be electrically isolated from each other such that electrical carriers of the appropriate polarity are injected into the p-type and n-type sides of the semiconductor junction, where they recombine to produce light.
FIG. 1
illustrates a typical III-nitride LED device. Semiconductor layers, including, for example, n-layer
12
, active region
13
, and p-layer
14
are epitaxially grown on substrate
11
. P-contact
15
and n-contact
17
are formed on the same side of the device as described above. Electrical isolation between the p-contact
15
and the n-contact
17
is achieved by etching a mesa structure
18
into the device extending from the topmost layer down into the underlying n-layer and forming separate, defined p-contact
15
and n-contact
17
. The LED is mounted to a submount assembly
22
, which typically includes a submount on which the LED is mounted with solder bumps. The solder bumps create a gap between the submount and the LED. The connected LED and submount assembly are then typically encapsulated in a high index of refraction gel or epoxy.
The high index gel or epoxy is selected to match the index of refraction of the sapphire substrate as closely as possible, since the light produced in the device is extracted through the sapphire substrate. When light is incident on an interface between two materials, the difference in index of refraction determines how much light is reflected at that interface, and how much light is transmitted through it. The larger the difference in index of refraction, the more light is reflected. Thus, the small difference between the index of refraction of the sapphire substrate and the high index gel encapsulating the device ensures that most of the light generated in the device that reaches the emitting surfaces of the sapphire substrate is extracted from the device.
Photons are generated efficiently within active region
13
, but extracting the photons from the semiconductor into the LED package and to the outside world is difficult, in part due to the high indices of refraction of the semiconductor layers. See, for example, Windisch et al., Applied Physics Letters, vol. 74, no. 16, p2256 (1999). Photons generated within the epitaxial semiconductor are incident upon either the interface between the semiconductor and substrate
11
, the interface at mesa wall
18
between the semiconductor and the high index gel in submount assembly
22
, or the interface between the semiconductor and the metal contacts. Photons incident on any of the three interfaces face a step in material refractive index. Such a step in refractive index causes a ray
20
incident on such an interface to be split into a transmitted portion
20
a
and a reflected portion
20
b
. Light transmitted out from mesa wall
18
(i.e. portion
20
a
) cannot be directed out of the device in a useful direction, thus light lost through transmission at mesa wall
18
contributes to the low light extraction efficiency of semiconductor LEDs.
The high index gel encapsulating the device results in a small difference in refractive index at the interface at mesa wall
18
between the semiconductor area between the contacts and the submount assembly. As a result, much of the light incident on this area is transmitted in the direction of the submount assembly, which causes significant optical loss. As described above, light extracted in this area towards the submount assembly cannot be usefully extracted from the package; rather, it is incident on the submount where it is absorbed. The device area between the contacts on a device such as that shown in
FIG. 1
is estimated at 10% of the total area. This area includes the mesa wall and a small portion of semiconductor material parallel to the substrate and between the edge of each contact and the mesa wall. Methods of reducing such losses include the use of wafer fabrication techniques such as self-aligned metalization and tightened manufacturing tolerances to reduce the area between the contacts parallel to the substrate. Such wafer fabrication techniques may result in other problems such as increased reliability problems and difficulty in manufacturing. In addition, wafer fabrication techniques do not significantly reduce losses, since 3-D optical ray trace modeling of high index gel-encapsulated, III-nitride LED structures grown on sapphire shows that, of the light undesirably extracted from the LED chip in this direction, the majority is lost through the mesa wall rather than from any surface of the epitaxial material which runs parallel to the substrate surface on which the epitaxial semiconductor was grown. The light extracted at the mesa wall is on the order of 15% of the light generated within the LED, the exact figure depending on, among other factors, the mesa wall height and angle.
Accordingly, an LED structure that minimizes optical loss at the mesa wall is needed.
SUMMARY
In accordance with the invention, a step in index of refraction is created at the mesa wall of a III-nitride flip chip light emitting device. The step in index of refraction reflects much of the light incident on the mesa wall back into the device where it can be usefully extracted. In some embodiments, a solder wall on the submount or a high index gel or epoxy coating the light emitting device and the submount creates a sealed gap between the light emitting device and the submount. The gap is filled with a material having a low index of refraction, such as air, another low index gas, low index flux, or a low index silicone gel or epoxy. In other embodiments, a high index material covers the substrate of the light emitting device, and a low index material fills the gap between the submount and the light emitting device. The high index material may be a silicone gel, epoxy, or a solid high index block, and the low index material may be a different silicone gel, epoxy, or a low index gas such as air.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5448114 (1995-09-01), Kondoh et al.
patent: 5585648 (1996-12-01), Tischler
patent: 5625202 (1997-04-01), Chai
patent: 5661074 (1997-08-01), Tischler
patent: 5679965 (1997-10-01), Schetzina
patent: 5739554 (1998-04-01), Edmond et al.
patent: 6015722 (2000-01-01), Banks et al.
patent: 6046464 (2000-04-01), Schetzina
patent: 6175151 (2001-01-01), Hashimoto
patent: 2001/0004188 (2001-06-01), Jacobsen et al.
Baliga, John, Technology News, Assembly & Packaging, “Low-Cost MEMS Packaging Includes Protective Cavities,” Semiconductor International, Feb. 2001, p. 56.
Bhat Jerome Chandra
Ludowise Michael Joseph
Steigerwald Daniel Alexander
Lebentritt Michael S.
LumiLeds Lighting U.S., LLC
Skjerven Morrill LLP
LandOfFree
Semiconductor LED flip-chip having low refractive index... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Semiconductor LED flip-chip having low refractive index..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Semiconductor LED flip-chip having low refractive index... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2834367