Self-defining plastics and the use thereof in dentistry and...

Synthetic resins or natural rubbers -- part of the class 520 ser – Synthetic resins – Processes of preparing a desired or intentional composition...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C523S106000, C523S122000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06495613

ABSTRACT:

The invention relates to plastics which are self-disinfecting. The invention relates in particular to dental plastics and impression materials in which a biocidal material is incorporated and the adhesivity of whose surface vis-à-vis microorganisms is reduced.
Disinfection is a permanent requirement in dental practices and dental engineering laboratories. The transmission of germs from contaminated gloves or even bare hands via equipment, tools or materials to humans presents an enormous risk for the patient, the dentist or dental technician and their assistants. Particularly in daily procedures in practice, the patient can come into contact with contaminated items or objects, microorganisms being able to enter the blood stream through open wounds. During a session, as a result for example of using contaminated gloves when mixing an impression material and using contaminated optical conductors for the light polymerisation of radiation-curable filling materials, the risk of infection can be increased. Although the hygiene regulations are very strict, no absolutely reliable protection against infection can be guaranteed.
The use of biocidal substances is known in other fields, for example the preparation of plasticized polyvinyl chloride for use as a swimming pool cleaner, (C. R. Jones, P. S. Handley, G. D. Robson, I. M. Eastwood and M. Greenhalgh “Biocides incorporated into plasticized polyvinyl chloride reduce adhesion of Pseudomonas fluorescens BL146 and substratum hydrophobicity”, Journal of Applied Bacteriology (1996) 81, 553-560). It is disadvantageous that the biocidal effect of the active ingredients 10,10-oxybisphenoxarsine (OBPA), 2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (OIT), 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-4-(methylsulphonyl)pyridine (TCMP) and N-trichloromethylthiophthalimide (NCMP) introduced into the plastic comes fully into play only if the microorganisms to be destroyed come into direct contact with the surface. The reduction of adhesion necessary for this is achieved by chance by the biocidal substances used themselves.
Substances containing silver, copper or zinc also show a biocidal effect, for example DuPont products (MicroFree™ AMP). Embedded in the most varied items made from plastic, an antimicrobial effect on the surfaces of such modified plastics is noted.
Another approach is the reduction of the adhesion of proteins on surfaces. As cell membranes of microorganisms are also built up from protein components, attempts are made to prevent the accumulation of microorganisms, but particularly also of blood components, by the reduction in adhesion of proteins. An extensive state of the art describes methods for changing the properties of plastics surfaces or complete plastics parts in order to make them biocompatible. Catheters, prostheses and implants obtain biocompatible surfaces by the methods described. The deposition of biological material, for example blood cells, on prostheses or catheters or the deposition of proteins from lacrimal fluid on contact lenses can be reduced if special plastics are used for the preparation of such objects or already pre-formed objects are coated with special polymers.
WO-93/01221 describes for example polymers made from one or more radically polymerizable monomers, these polymers having groups with a permanent positive charge and groups which are able to develop a bond on surfaces.
A further approach is known from WO-94/14897, in which the biocompatibility of polymers is obtained by the coupling with polymers containing amphoteric ion groups. The amphoteric ion group is normally an ammonium salt ester; the polymer which contains this group, can be prepared via the free radical polymerisation of ethylenically unsaturated monomers together with a monomer which contains an amphoteric ion group.
Compounds which contain phosphorylcholine groups are known for their haemocompatibilizing properties and for the adhesion-reducing effect of platelets on surfaces which are treated with these compounds or have been prepared from such compounds. WO-93/21970 describes for example methods for preparing surfaces which contain groups of the general formula
where R is the same or can be different and represents an alkyl radical with 1 to 4 C atoms and a can range from 1 to 4.
M. Humphries, J. F. Jaworzyn, J. B. Cantwell and A. Eakin described in FEMS Microbiology Letters (1987) 42, 91-101, the use of non-ionic ethoxylated and propoxylated surfactants in order to reduce the adhesion of bacteria to solid surfaces. Alcoholic ethoxylates and alkylphenolethoxylates (ICI Plastics and Petrochemicals Division, Wilton, U.K.) are used there in particular. In FEMS Microbiology Ecology (1986) 38, 299-308, M. Humphries, J. F. Jaworzyn and J. B. Cantwell described the use of biological polymers and synthetic surfactants in order to reduce the adhesion of certain bacteria species by the production of hydrophobic surfaces.
It is known however, that it is not sufficient to make the surfaces either hydrophobic or hydrophilic in order to lower the adhesion of microorganisms, as the nature of the cell walls can be completely different depending on the species.
The method of A. Pavesio, D. Renier, C. Cassinelli and M. Morra in Medical Device Technology (September 1997), 20 et seq is included in the series of coating processes, in which anti-adhesive surfaces are described by coatings with hyaluron derivatives.
More recent coating means, containing polymers with repeating units with polar or polarizable, modulating and hydrophobic fluoride-containing groups, are known from EP-0794756-A1 and EP-0794757-A1 (3M).
Preparations are also sometimes described which contain compounds which have both antimicrobial activity vis-à-vis certain bacterial strains and at the same time are intended to reduce their adhesion (Journal of Oral Rehabilitation (1988), 15, 405-411).
To summarize, the following methods are described in the state of the art:
reduction of the protein adhesion by surface treatment or by modifying the basic plastics,
destruction of the microorganisms on free surfaces by incorporated biocides.
The respective effects of these known processes are however still not satisfactory.
The object of the present invention is to prepare plastics which are improved regarding their adhesion-reducing properties or biocidal effects.
The object is achieved by specially modified plastics which are characterized in that they contain adhesion-reducing substances in such a quantity that the adhesion of microorganisms to their surface is lower by at least 50% than for non-modified plastics, and in that they contain biocidal substances in such a quantity that at least 60% of the microorganisms remaining are destroyed within 24 hours.
Permanently moist ambient conditions are present particularly in the field of dentistry. If a liquid film is located on the surface of plastics and impression materials, it is naturally permeated with proteins or microorganisms, which is extremely disadvantageous. No hopes were raised that biocidal substances would be incorporated in plastics as a result of using adhesion-reducing substances in these, as it was assumed that bacteria only briefly come into contact with the surfaces, because of the adhesion-reducing effect, at any rate too briefly for this biocidal effect to occur. Surprisingly, in spite of a clear reduction in adhesion of proteins to the surfaces of the plastics modified according to the invention, the contact time of the microorganisms with the surfaces is long enough, so that the microorganisms are predominantly destroyed.
The invention is described in detail below.
All known types of plastics can be used as plastics, depending on the modifier to be used; polyethylenes, polypropylenes, polyvinyl chlorides, polystyrenes, polycarbonates, cellophanes, cellulose acetates, polyolefins, fluorinated hydrocarbons (Teflon), polyhydroxyethyl methacrylates (PHEMA) (Hydron), polymethyl methacrylates (PMMA), polysiloxanes, polyethers and polyether silicones maybe mentioned as examples without being limitative.
A step essential to the invention is to introduce biocid

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Self-defining plastics and the use thereof in dentistry and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Self-defining plastics and the use thereof in dentistry and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Self-defining plastics and the use thereof in dentistry and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2928337

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.