Selective merchandise price optimization

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S014270, C705S400000

Reexamination Certificate

active

09994465

ABSTRACT:
An interface that enables a user to determine optimum prices of products for sale. The interface includes a scenario/results processor through which the user prescribes an optimization scenario, and through which optimum prices are presented to the user. The optimum prices are determined by execution of the optimization scenario, where the optimum prices are determined based upon estimated product demand and calculated activity based costs. The scenario/results processor has an input/output processor and a scenario controller. The input/output processor acquires data corresponding to the optimization scenario from the user, and distributes optimization results to the user. The scenario controller is coupled to the input/output processor. The scenario controller controls acquisition of the data and the distribution of the optimization results in accordance with a price optimization procedure. The price optimization procedure is configured to relax constraints of lower priority conflicting rules to render the optimization scenario feasible.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3017610 (1962-01-01), Auerbach et al.
patent: 4744026 (1988-05-01), Vanderbei
patent: 5063506 (1991-11-01), Brockwell et al.
patent: 5117354 (1992-05-01), Long et al.
patent: 5189606 (1993-02-01), Burns
patent: 5212791 (1993-05-01), Damian et al.
patent: 5249120 (1993-09-01), Foley
patent: 5299115 (1994-03-01), Fields et al.
patent: 5377095 (1994-12-01), Maeda et al.
patent: 5459656 (1995-10-01), Fields et al.
patent: 5521813 (1996-05-01), Fox et al.
patent: 5615109 (1997-03-01), Eder
patent: 5694551 (1997-12-01), Doyle et al.
patent: 5712985 (1998-01-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5732401 (1998-03-01), Conway
patent: 5765143 (1998-06-01), Sheldon et al.
patent: 5790643 (1998-08-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 5799286 (1998-08-01), Morgan et al.
patent: 5822736 (1998-10-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 5873069 (1999-02-01), Reuhl et al.
patent: 5878400 (1999-03-01), Carter, III
patent: 5918209 (1999-06-01), Campbell et al.
patent: 5933813 (1999-08-01), Teicher et al.
patent: 5987425 (1999-11-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 6009407 (1999-12-01), Garg
patent: 6029139 (2000-02-01), Cunningham et al.
patent: 6032123 (2000-02-01), Jameson
patent: 6032125 (2000-02-01), Ando
patent: 6044357 (2000-03-01), Garg
patent: 6052686 (2000-04-01), Fernandez et al.
patent: 6078893 (2000-06-01), Ouimet et al.
patent: 6094641 (2000-07-01), Ouimet et al.
patent: 6125355 (2000-09-01), Bekaert et al.
patent: 6134534 (2000-10-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6173345 (2001-01-01), Stevens
patent: 6202070 (2001-03-01), Nguyen et al.
patent: 6205431 (2001-03-01), Willemain et al.
patent: 6219649 (2001-04-01), Jameson
patent: 6308162 (2001-10-01), Ouimet et al.
patent: 6321207 (2001-11-01), Ye
patent: 6341268 (2002-01-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6341269 (2002-01-01), Dulaney et al.
patent: 6397193 (2002-05-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6405175 (2002-06-01), Ng
patent: 6456986 (2002-09-01), Boardman et al.
patent: 6546387 (2003-04-01), Triggs
patent: 6553352 (2003-04-01), Delurgio et al.
patent: 6567824 (2003-05-01), Fox
patent: 6684193 (2004-01-01), Chavez et al.
patent: 6697824 (2004-02-01), Bowman-Amuah
patent: 6725208 (2004-04-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 6731998 (2004-05-01), Walser et al.
patent: 6735572 (2004-05-01), Landesmann
patent: 6745184 (2004-06-01), Choi et al.
patent: 6826538 (2004-11-01), Kalyan et al.
patent: 6910017 (2005-06-01), Woo et al.
patent: 6934931 (2005-08-01), Plumer et al.
patent: 6965867 (2005-11-01), Jameson
patent: 6988076 (2006-01-01), Ouimet
patent: 7058617 (2006-06-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 2002/0023001 (2002-02-01), McFarlin et al.
patent: 2002/0042739 (2002-04-01), Srinivasan et al.
patent: 2002/0107819 (2002-08-01), Ouimet
patent: 2002/0116348 (2002-08-01), Phillips et al.
patent: 2002/0123930 (2002-09-01), Boyd et al.
patent: 2002/0165834 (2002-11-01), Delurgio et al.
patent: 2002/0198794 (2002-12-01), Williams et al.
patent: 2003/0110072 (2003-06-01), Delurgio et al.
patent: 2003/0177103 (2003-09-01), Ivanov et al.
patent: 2006/0224534 (2006-10-01), Hartman et al.
patent: WO9746950 (1997-12-01), None
patent: WO 98/53415 (1998-11-01), None
patent: WO0070519 (2000-11-01), None
patent: WO0070556 (2000-11-01), None
Montgomery: “The Impact of Micro-Marketing on Pricing Strategies”, 1994 The University of Chicago, vol. 55/12-A of Dissertation Abstracts International, p. 3922 (Abstract Only).
Busch: “Cost modeling as a technical management tool”, Reasearch-Technology Management, Nov./Dec. 1994, vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 50-56.
“Pacificorp IRP: Renewables Costs Must Drop 65% to be Competitive with Gas”.
“PCT International Search Report”, Application No. PCT/US02/36710, mailed Jul. 21, 2003.
Yoeman, John Cornelius Jr., “The Optimal Offering Price for Underwritten Securities”, 1993, vol. 55/01-A of Dissertation Abstracts International, p. 4743 (Abstract Only).
“PCT International Search Report”, Application No. PCT/US02/14977, mailed May 5, 2003.
Dyer, Robert F. et al., “Case Studies in Marketing Decisions Using Expert Choice,” Decision Support Software, 1988, pp. 2-7, 73-108.
“PCT International Search Report”, Application No. PCT/US03/30488, mailed Jan. 28, 2004.
Bruce G.S. Hardie et al., “Attribute-based Market Share Models: Methodological Development and Managerial Applications”, University of Pennsylvania, Working Paper 98-009, pp. 1-48, 1998.
Rossi, Delorgio, & Kantor; “Making Sense of Scanner Data;” Harvard Business Review, Reprint F00205, 2000.
“Pacificorp IRP: Renewables Costs Must Drop 65% to be Competitive with Gas,” dated Dec. 8, 1995.
Robert J. Dolan, “How Do You Know When the Price is Right?”, Harvard Business Review, Sep.-Oct. 1995, p. 4-11.
Alan L. Montgomery and Peter R. Rossi, “Estimating Price Elasticities with Theory-Based Priors,” Journal of Marketing Research vol. XXXVI, Nov. 1999 (pp. 413-423).
Boatwright, Peter et al., “Account-Level Modeling for Trade Promotion: An Application of a Constrained Parameter Hierarchical Model,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 94, No. 448, Dec. 1999 (pp. 1063-1073).
Alan L. Montgomery, “Creating Micro-Marketing Pricing Strategies Using Supermarket Scanner Data,” Marketing Science, vol. 16, No. 4, 1997 (pp. 315-337).
Robert C. Blattberg and Edward I. George, “Shrinkage Estimation of Price and Promotional Elasticities: Seemingly Unrelated Equations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 86, No. 414, Jun. 1991 (pp. 304-315).
Arnold Zellner, “On Assessing Prior Distribution sand Bayesian Regression Analysis With G-Prior Distributions,” Elsevier Science Publishers, 1986 (pp. 233-243).
A.F.M. Smith, “A General Bayesian Linear Model,” University of Oxford, Apr. 1972.
D.V. Lindley and A.F.M. Smith, “Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model,” University College, Dec. 1971.
George C. Tiao and Arnold Zellner, “On the Bayesian Estimation of Multivariate Regression,” University of Wisconsin, Jan. 1964.
Arnold Zellner, “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias,” University of Wisconsin, Jun. 1962.
“Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary”, 10thedition, p. 585, Merriam-Webster Incorporated, 1999.
Hernandez, Mauricio A., and Salvatore J. Stolfo, “Real-world Data is Dirty: Data Cleansing and the Merge/Purge Problem”, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 2, Issue 1, Jan. 1998.
Scherage, Dan, “You Do the Math,” Chain Store Age, v76, n7, Jul. 2000.
“Gymboree Enhances Price Management,” Retail Systems Alert, vol. 13, No. 6, Jun. 2000.
Binkley, James K.; Connor, John M., “Grocery Market Pricing and the New Competitive Environment.” Journal of Retailing, v74, n2, Summer 1998.
Rossi et al. “Making Sense of Scanner Data.”Harvard Business Review. Reprint F002

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Selective merchandise price optimization does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Selective merchandise price optimization, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Selective merchandise price optimization will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3821117

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.