Search document generation and use to provide recommendations

Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database and file access – Post processing of search results

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C707S706000, C707S721000, C707S737000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08005832

ABSTRACT:
Particular embodiments provide a search service using a search document. Complex, multi-site, multi-query searches may be performed using the search document. To use a search document, a user may activate the service. The search document may then capture data for an entire search performed for the users search across various online and offline resources. One or more partial search results may be determined for a search document. Partial search results may be automatically determined based on one or more resources being visited by a user during a search. Also, partial search results may be specified by a user from pages being visited, such as a user may select items on a page to be included in the search document. The partial search results are then used to provide a recommendation to the user for the specified search.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6285999 (2001-09-01), Page
patent: 6453315 (2002-09-01), Weissman
patent: 6493702 (2002-12-01), Adar et al.
patent: 6816857 (2004-11-01), Weissman
patent: 2001/0021914 (2001-09-01), Jacobi et al.
patent: 2002/0016786 (2002-02-01), Pitkow et al.
patent: 2004/0059708 (2004-03-01), Dean
patent: 2004/0199497 (2004-10-01), Timmons
patent: 2005/0135596 (2005-06-01), Zhao
patent: 2005/0216452 (2005-09-01), Teague
patent: 2005/0216528 (2005-09-01), Cheng
patent: 2005/0262052 (2005-11-01), Daniels et al.
patent: 2006/0069699 (2006-03-01), Smadja et al.
patent: 2006/0149578 (2006-07-01), Weild
patent: 2006/0224938 (2006-10-01), Fikes
patent: 2007/0124194 (2007-05-01), Barnette
Agirre (2001) Agirre E., Ansa O., Martinez D., Hovy E. “Enriching WordNet concepts with topic signatures.” Proceedings of the SIGLEX workshop on “WordNet and Other Lexical Resources: Applications, Extensions and Customizations”. In conjunction with NAACL. 2001.
Agirre and Lopez (2004) Agirre, E. And O. Lopez, “Publicly Available Topic Signatures for all WordNet Nominal Senses.” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Languages Resources and Evaluations. 2004.
Agirre, et al (2004) Agirre, E., E. Alfonseca, and O. Lopez, “Approximating Hierarchy-based Similarity for WordNet Nominal Synsets Using Topic Signatures.” Proceedings of 2nd International Global WordNet Conference. 2004.
Gonzalo (1998) Gonzalo, J., Verdejo, F., Chugur, I., and Cigarrán, J. “Indexing withWordNet Synsets can improve Text Retrieval.” Proceedings of the Workshop on Usage of WordNet for NLP. 1998.
Krovetz, R., and Croft, W. (1993) Krovetz, R., and Croft, W. “Lexical Ambiguity and Information Retrieval.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems. vol. 10. Issue 2. 1993. pp. 115-141.
Krovetz (1997) Krovetz, R. “Homonymy and Polysemy in Information Retrieval.” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1997. pp. 72-79.
Leacock et al. (1998) Leacock, Claudia, Chodorow, M., and Miller, G.A. “Using Corpus Statistics and WordNet Relations for Sense Identification.” Computational Linguistics, 24(1). 1998. pp. 147-165. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/leacock98using.html.
Luk (1995) Luk, A.K. “Statistical Sense Disambiguation with Relatively Small Corpora Using Dictionary Definitions”. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association forComputational Linguistics.1995.
Mihalcea and Moldovan (2000) Mihalcea, R., and Moldovan, D. “An Iterative Approach to Word Sense Disambiguation.” Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. 2000. pp. 219-223.
Sanderson, M. (1994, 2000) Sanderson, M. “Word Sense Disambiguation and Information Retrieval.” Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGIR. 1994. pp. 49-57, 142, 151.
Schütze, H., and Pedersen, J. (1995) Schütze, H., and Pedersen, J. “Information retrieval based on word senses.” Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval. 1995. pp. 161-175.
Stokoe (2005) Stokoe, Christopher. “Differentiating Homonymy and Polysemy in Information Retrieval.” Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language. 2005. pp. 403-410.
Stokoe and Tait (2003) Stokoe, Christopher, and John Tait. “Towards a Sense Based Document Representation for Internet Information Retrieval.” NIST Special Publication 500-255: The Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference. 2003. pp. 791-795.
Sussna (1993) Sussna, M. “Word Sense Disambiguation for Free-Text Indexing Using a Massive Semantic Network.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1993. pp. 67-74.
Voorhees (1994) Voorhees, E. “On Expanding Query Vectors with Lexically Related Words.” Proceedings of the 2nd Text Retrieval Conference. NIST special publication, No. 500215. 1994. p. 223.
Voorhees (1994) Voorhees, E. “Query Expansion Using Lexical-Semantic Relations.” Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR, Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1994. pp. 61-69.
Woods, W. (1997) Woods, W. “Conceptual Indexing: A Better Way to Organize Knowlege.” Technical Report: TR-97-61. Sun Microsystems Laboratories, Mountain View, CA. 1997.
Markoff, John. “Searching for Michael Jordan? Microsoft Wants a Better Way” New York Times, NY. Mar. 7, 2006. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/07/business/07soft.html?th&emc=th.
Sanderson, M. “Retrieving with Good Sense.” Information Retrieval, vol. 2(1). 2000. pp. 49-69.
Ezzy, Ebrahim “Search 2.0 vs Traditional Search, Part 2” Read/Write Web. Jul. 25, 2006 obtained at http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/search—20—vs—tr—1.php.
Steve Small, et al., “Parsing and Comprehending with Word Experts (A theory and its Realization)”, University of Maryland, Chapter 4, pp. 89-147, 1982.
Ellen M. Voorhees, “Using WordNet for Text Retrieval”, Chapter 12, pp. 285-303, 1998.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Search document generation and use to provide recommendations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Search document generation and use to provide recommendations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Search document generation and use to provide recommendations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2750052

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.