Wells – Processes – Perforating – weakening – bending or separating pipe at an...
Reexamination Certificate
2006-11-07
2006-11-07
Dang, Hoang (Department: 3672)
Wells
Processes
Perforating, weakening, bending or separating pipe at an...
C166S055100, C166S227000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07131494
ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides a screen for a well that utilizes a partial screen wrapping used to advantage with side conduits (e.g., alternate flowpaths), control lines, intelligent completions devices, and the like. It is emphasized that this abstract is provided to comply with the rules requiring an abstract that will allow a searcher or other reader to quickly ascertain the subject matter of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims.
REFERENCES:
patent: 997191 (1911-07-01), Hogarth
patent: 1276213 (1918-08-01), Hare
patent: 2371385 (1945-03-01), Eckel
patent: 2530966 (1950-11-01), Huber
patent: 2696169 (1954-12-01), Lassiter, Jr.
patent: 2760581 (1956-08-01), Johnston et al.
patent: 3415321 (1968-12-01), Venghiattis
patent: 5174379 (1992-12-01), Whiteley et al.
patent: 6131662 (2000-10-01), Ross
patent: 6457518 (2002-10-01), Castano-Mears et al.
patent: 6962203 (2005-11-01), Funchess
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.) (PACER Jun. 2, 2005) (5 pages).
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.) (PACER Aug. 11, 2005) (13 pages).
Communication from United States District Court Transferring Case,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.), dated Sep. 7, 2004 (1 page).
Plaintiffs Original Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed May 14, 2004 (20 pages).
Defendants' Motions (1) to Dismiss the Complaint for Insufficiency of Process and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, (2) to Dismiss Counts I-III of the Compliant for Failure to State a Claim, and (3) in the Alternative, to Transfer This Action to the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed Jul. 7, 2004 (49 pages).
Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V. Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 19, 2004 (20 pages).
Answer of Defendants and Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.) filed Nov. 2, 2004 (20 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Answer to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Dec. 3, 2004 (10 pages).
Shlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
First Amended Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technolgy N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 9, 2005 (16 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (29 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Opposition of Kentucky Oil to Motions of Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Dismiss First Amended Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (29 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (9 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (4 pages).
Reply of Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Kentucky Oil Technology's Opposition to First Amended, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (17 pages).
Schlumberger's Response to Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Schlumberger's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 2, and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to STC's Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 3 and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Declaration of Benjamin Holl and Portions of Counterdefendants' Reply Briefs,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (4 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Kentucky Oil's Motion to Strike Declaration of Benjamin Holl and Portions of Counterdefendants' Reply Briefs,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), entered Mar. 25, 2005 (2 pages).
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Counterdefendants' Motion to Dismiss,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), entered Apr. 8, 2005 (26 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), file
Bixenman Patrick W.
Danos Jake A.
Hackworth Matthew R.
Johnson Craig D.
Castano Jaime A.
Dang Hoang
McEnaney Kevin P.
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Someren Robert A. Van
LandOfFree
Screen and method having a partial screen wrap does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Screen and method having a partial screen wrap, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Screen and method having a partial screen wrap will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3625032