Scleral expansion device having duck bill

Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Eye prosthesis

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

06991650

ABSTRACT:
A prosthesis for scleral expansion includes a central body portion and at least one end portion having a width greater than the width of the central body portion. The end portion therefore inhibits rotation of the prosthesis about a long axis when the prosthesis is implanted within a scleral pocket or tunnel. The other end of the central body portion may have a blunted end portion including grooves for receiving a edge or lip of an incision forming the scleral tunnel to inhibit the prosthesis from sliding within the scleral tunnel. Curvature of the bottom surface of the central body portion may be greater than the curvature of the innermost surface of the scleral tunnel so that contact between the scleral and the bottom surface of the prosthesis is primarily with the end portions.

REFERENCES:
patent: 2952023 (1960-09-01), Rosen
patent: 3064643 (1962-11-01), Dixon
patent: 3454966 (1969-07-01), Rosen
patent: 4439198 (1984-03-01), Brightman, II et al.
patent: 4521210 (1985-06-01), Wong
patent: 4549529 (1985-10-01), White
patent: 4863457 (1989-09-01), Lee
patent: 4946436 (1990-08-01), Smith
patent: 4976719 (1990-12-01), Siepser
patent: 5354331 (1994-10-01), Schachar
patent: 5370607 (1994-12-01), Memmen
patent: 5443505 (1995-08-01), Wong et al.
patent: 5465737 (1995-11-01), Schachar
patent: 5489299 (1996-02-01), Schachar
patent: 5503165 (1996-04-01), Schachar
patent: 5520631 (1996-05-01), Nordquist et al.
patent: 5529076 (1996-06-01), Schachar
patent: 5558630 (1996-09-01), Fisher
patent: RE35390 (1996-12-01), Smith
patent: 5707643 (1998-01-01), Ogura et al.
patent: 5722952 (1998-03-01), Schachar
patent: 5731909 (1998-03-01), Schachar
patent: 5766242 (1998-06-01), Wong et al.
patent: 5774274 (1998-06-01), Schachar
patent: 5824086 (1998-10-01), Silverstrini
patent: RE35974 (1998-12-01), Davenport et al.
patent: 5846256 (1998-12-01), Mathis et al.
patent: 5855604 (1999-01-01), Lee
patent: 5879319 (1999-03-01), Pynson et al.
patent: 5888243 (1999-03-01), Silverstrini
patent: 5919228 (1999-07-01), Hennig
patent: 5944752 (1999-08-01), Silvestrini
patent: 5964748 (1999-10-01), Peyman
patent: 6007578 (1999-12-01), Schachar
patent: 6280468 (2001-08-01), Schachar
patent: 6299640 (2001-10-01), Schachar
patent: 2 784 287 (1998-10-01), None
patent: 2 791 552 (2000-06-01), None
patent: WO 94/18921 (1994-09-01), None
patent: WO 96/40005 (1996-12-01), None
patent: WO 98/42409 (1998-10-01), None
patent: WO 99/17684 (1999-04-01), None
patent: WO 99/17691 (1999-04-01), None
patent: WO 00/25703 (2000-05-01), None
patent: WO 00/40174 (2000-07-01), None
patent: WO 01/17460 (2000-08-01), None
patent: WO 00/59406 (2000-10-01), None
Schachar, “Cause and Treatment of Presbyopia With a Method for Increasing the Amplitude of Accomodation,” Ann Ophthalmol, 24: 445-452 (1992).
Schachar, et al., “Mathematic Proof of Schachar's Hypothesis of Accomodation,” Ann Ophthalmol, 25: 5-9 (1993).
Schachar, et al., Experimental Support for Schachar's Hypothesis of Accommodation, Ann Ophthalmol 25: 404-409 (1993).
Schachar, et al., “A Physical Model Demonstrating Schachar's Hypothesis of Accomodation,” Ann Ophthalmol 26:4-9 (1994).
Schachar, “Zonular Function: A New Hypothesis with Clinical Implications,” Ann Ophthalmol 26: 36-38 (1994).
Schachar, et al., “The Effect of Gravity on the Amplitude of Accommodation,” Ann Ophthalmol 26: 65-70 (1994).
Schachar, et al., “The Mechanism of Accommodation and Presbyopia in the Primate,” Ann Ophthalmol 27:58-67 (1995).
Schachar, et al., “The Mechanism of Ciliary Muscle Function,” Ann Ophthalmol 27:126-132 (1995).
Schachar, “Histology of the Ciliary Muscle-Zonular Connections,” Ann Ophthalmol 28:70-79 (1996).
Schachar, et al., “Equatorial Diameter During Accommodation,” American Physiological Society R670-R676 (1996).
Yee, et al., “Scleral Expansion: New Surgical Technique to Correct Presbyopia,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 30(4):, 5 (1997).
Glasser, et al., “Presbyopia and the Optical Changes in the Human Crystalline Lens with Age,” Vision Res., 38:209-229 (1998).
Schachar, “Pathophysiology of Accommodation and Presbyopia,” J. Florida M.A. 81:268-271 (1994).
Schachar, et al., “A Revolutionary Variable Focus Lens,” Annals of Ophthalmology, 2811-18 (1996).
Adler-Grinberg, “Questioning Our Classical Understanding of Accommodation and Presbyopia,” Am. J. Optometry & Physiological Optics, 63(7) 571-580 (1986).
Omi, et al., “Modified Schochet Implant for Refractory Glaucoma,” Ophthalmology 98:211-214 (1991).
Arons, “LASIK and PRK clinical results are hot topics at the RSIG and ISRS meetings,” Ocular Surgery News, http://www.slackline.com/eye/osn/19901a/lasik/asp, Jan. 1, 1999.
Atchinson, “Accommodation and Presbyopia,” Ophthal Physiol. Opt. 15(4):255-272 (1995).
Bernatchez, et al., “Biocompatibility of a new semisolid bioerodable poly(orth ester) intended to the ocular delivery of 5-fluorouracil,” J. Biomedical Materials Research, 28:1037-1046 (1994).
Billson, et al., “Resiting Molteno Implant Tubes,” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, 27:801-803 (1996).
Brockhurst, “DystrophicCalcification of Silicone Scleral Buckling Implant Materials,” Am. J. Ophthalmol, 115:524-529 (1993).
Brouillette, et al., “Long-term results of modified trabeculectomy with Supramid implant for neovascular glaucoma,” Can. J. Ophthalmol, 22(5):254-256 (1987).
Cameron, et al., “Clinico-histophathologic Correlation of a Successful Glaucoma Pump-shunt Implant,” Ophthalmology, 95:1189-1194 (1988).
Campbell, et al., “Fluctuations of Accommodation Under Steady Viewing Conditions,” J. Physiol., 145:579-594 (1959).
Coleman, et al., “Initial Clinical Experience with the Ahmed Claucoma Implant,” Am. J. Ophth. 120:23-31 (1995).
Coleman, et al., “Clinical Experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant in Eyes with prior or Current Penetrating Keratoplasties,” Am. J. Ophth., 123:54-61 (1997).
Colosi, et al., “Intrusion of Scleral Implant Associated with Conjunctival Epithelial Ingrowth,” Am. J. Ophthalmol, 83:504-507 (1997).
Coltair, et al., “Scleral Pocket Incision Applied to Insertion of the Nut and Bolt Keratoprosthesis,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 16:649-651 (1990).
Crucea, et al., “Artificial Draininge Devices in Glaucoma” Optalmologia, 47(2):5-10, Abstract only.
Daniele, et al., “Gelatin as an Absorbable Implant in Scleral Buckling Procedured,” Arch Ophthal, 80:115-119 (1968).
Elander, “Scleral Expansion Sugery does not restore accommodatino in human presbyopia,” J. Refract. Surg., 15(5):604 (1999).
Ellis, “Surgical Conquest of Presbyopia; Are There Implications for Cataract and Glaucoma,” Refractive Surgery, 38-44 (1999).
El-Sayyad, “The Use of Releasable Sutures in Molteno Glaucoma Implants ot Reduce Postoperative Hypotony,” Ophthalmic Surgery, 22:82-84 (1991).
Girard, et al., “Scleral fixation of a subluxated posterior chamber intraocular lens,”J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 14:326-327 (1988).
Hashizoe, et al., “Implantable biodegradable polymeric device in the treatment of experimental proliferative viteoretinopathy,” Curr. Eye Res., 14(6):473-477 (1995).
Hashizoe, et al., “Scleral plug of biodegradable polymers for controlled drug release in the vitreous,” Arch. Ophthalmol., 112(10):1380-1384 (1994).
Hashizoe, et al., “Biodetgradable polymeric devices for sustained intravitreal release of glanciclovir in rabbits,” Current Eye Research, 112(10): 633-339 (1997).
Hasty, et al., “Primate Trabeculectomies with 5-fluorouracil Collagen Implants,” Am. J. Ophthalmol, 109:721-725 (1990).
Hilton, et al., “The Removal of Scleral Buckles,” Arch Ophthalmol, 96:2061-2063 (1978).
Ho, e

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Scleral expansion device having duck bill does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Scleral expansion device having duck bill, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Scleral expansion device having duck bill will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3562315

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.