Scheduling the dispatch of cells in non-empty virtual output...

Multiplex communications – Pathfinding or routing – Through a circuit switch

Reissue Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C370S351000, C370S231000, C370S360000, C370S361000, C379S271000, C379S272000

Reissue Patent

active

RE042600

ABSTRACT:
A pipeline-based matching scheduling approach for input-buffered switches relaxes the timing constraint for arbitration with matching schemes, such as CRRD and CMSD. In the new approach, arbitration may operate in a pipelined manner. Each sub-scheduler is allowed to take more than one time slot for its matching. Every time slot, one of them provides a matching result(s). The sub-scheduler can use a matching scheme such as CRRD and CMSD.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5367520 (1994-11-01), Cordell
patent: 5495474 (1996-02-01), Olnowich et al.
patent: 5495476 (1996-02-01), Kumar
patent: 5689506 (1997-11-01), Chiussi et al.
patent: 5889775 (1999-03-01), Sawicz et al.
patent: 6061330 (2000-05-01), Johansson
patent: 6072772 (2000-06-01), Charny et al.
patent: 6078585 (2000-06-01), Kakuma et al.
patent: 6125112 (2000-09-01), Koning et al.
patent: 6141323 (2000-10-01), Rusu et al.
patent: 6154459 (2000-11-01), Wicklund
patent: 6157643 (2000-12-01), Ma
patent: 6285679 (2001-09-01), Dally et al.
patent: 6295295 (2001-09-01), Wicklund
patent: 6324165 (2001-11-01), Fan et al.
patent: 6473428 (2002-10-01), Nichols et al.
patent: 6477169 (2002-11-01), Angle et al.
patent: 6563837 (2003-05-01), Krishna et al.
patent: 6625121 (2003-09-01), Lau et al.
patent: 6657959 (2003-12-01), Chong et al.
patent: 6661773 (2003-12-01), Pelissier et al.
patent: 6687225 (2004-02-01), Kawarai et al.
patent: 6725267 (2004-04-01), Hoang
patent: 6747971 (2004-06-01), Hughes et al.
patent: 6795442 (2004-09-01), Clayton et al.
patent: 6810031 (2004-10-01), Hegde et al.
patent: 6816487 (2004-11-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 6940851 (2005-09-01), Oki et al.
patent: 6959002 (2005-10-01), Wynne et al.
patent: 6977935 (2005-12-01), Kamiya et al.
patent: 6987732 (2006-01-01), Gracon et al.
patent: 6999413 (2006-02-01), Moriwaki et al.
patent: 7006514 (2006-02-01), Oki et al.
patent: 7023840 (2006-04-01), Golla et al.
patent: 7042883 (2006-05-01), Fan et al.
patent: 7046661 (2006-05-01), Oki et al.
patent: 7065046 (2006-06-01), Andrews et al.
patent: 7103056 (2006-09-01), Chao et al.
patent: 7154885 (2006-12-01), Nong
patent: 7158528 (2007-01-01), Dell et al.
patent: 7173931 (2007-02-01), Chao
patent: 7277428 (2007-10-01), Libeskind
patent: 7292576 (2007-11-01), Yasukawa et al.
patent: 7339935 (2008-03-01), Yasukawa et al.
patent: 7492782 (2009-02-01), Jun et al.
patent: 7519065 (2009-04-01), Angle et al.
patent: 2001/0023469 (2001-09-01), Jeong et al.
patent: 2002/0061020 (2002-05-01), Chao et al.
patent: 2002/0110134 (2002-08-01), Gracon et al.
patent: 2002/0131412 (2002-09-01), Shah et al.
patent: 2002/0141427 (2002-10-01), McAlpine
patent: 2002/0176431 (2002-11-01), Golla et al.
patent: 2002/0181483 (2002-12-01), Oki et al.
patent: 2003/0007498 (2003-01-01), Angle et al.
patent: 2003/0021266 (2003-01-01), Oki et al.
patent: 2004/0081184 (2004-04-01), Magill et al.
patent: 2004/0120321 (2004-06-01), Han et al.
patent: 2005/0053096 (2005-03-01), Yasukawa et al.
patent: 2005/0083939 (2005-04-01), Yasukawa et al.
McKeown, N. W., “Scheduling Algorithms for Input-Queued Cell Switches,” PhD Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 1995.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 09/851,461.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 09/851,461.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 09/851,461.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 27, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 09/851,461.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 09/872,892.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 09/872,892.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 09/872,892.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 09/873,110.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 21, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 09/873,110.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,038.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 25, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,038.
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 12, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,044.
C. Y. Lee and A. Y. Oruç, “A Fast Parallel Algorithm for Routing Unicast Assignments in Benes Networks,”IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Sys.,vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 329-334 (Mar. 1995).
T. T. Lee and S-Y Liew, “Parallel Routing Algorithms in Benes-Clos Networks,”Proc. IEEE INFOCOM '96,pp. 279-286 (1996).
N. McKeown, M. Izzard, A. Mekkittikul, W. Ellersick and M. Horowitz, “Tiny-Tera: A Packet Switch Core,”IEEE Micro.,pp. 26-33 (Jan.-Feb. 1997).
T. Chaney, J. A. Fingerhut, M. Flucke, J. S. Turner, “Design of a Gigabit ATM Switch,”Proc. IEEE INFOCOM'97,pp. 2-11 (Apr. 1997).
F. M. Chiussi, J. G. Kneuer, and V. P. Kumar, “Low-Cost Scalable Switching Solutions for Broadband Networking: The ATLANTA Architecture and Chipset,”IEEE Commun. Mag.,pp. 44-53 (Dec. 1997).
J. Turner and N. Yamanaka, “Architectural Choices in Large Scale ATM Switches,”IEICE Trans. Commun.,vol. E81-B, No. 2, pp. 120-137 (Feb. 1998).
H. J. Chao and J-S Park, “Centralized Contention Resolution Schemes for a Large-Capacity Optical ATM Switch,”Proc. IEEE ATM Workshop '97,pp. 11-16 (Fairfax, VA, May 1998).
G. Nong, J. K. Muppala and M. Hamdi, “Analysis of Nonblocking ATM Switches with Multiple Input Queues,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 60-74 (Feb. 1999).
N. McKeown, “The iSLIP Scheduling Algorithm for Input-Queued Switches,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 188-201 (Apr. 1999).
A, Smiljanić, R. Fan and G. Ramamurthy, “RRGS-Round-Robin Greedy Scheduling for Electronic/Optical Terabit Switches,”Global Telecommunications Conference-Globe-com '99,pp. 1244-1250 (May 1999).
N. McKeown, A. Mekkittikul, V. Anantharam, and J. Walrand, “Achieving 100% Throughput in an Input-Queued Switch,”IEEE Trans. on Communications,vol. 47, No. 8, pp. 1260-1267 (Aug. 1999).
E. Oki, N. Yamanaka, Y. Ohtomo, K. Okazaki and R. Kawano, “A 10-Gb/s (1.25 Gb/s×8) 4×2 0.25-μm CMOS/SIMOX ATM Switch Based on Scalable Distributed Arbitration,”IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits,vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 1921-1934 (Dec. 1999).
N. Yamanaka, E. Oki, S. Yasukawa, R. Kawano and K. Okazaki, “OPTIMA: Scalable, Multi-Stage, 640-Gbit/s ATM Switching System Based on Advanced Electronic and Optical WDM Technologies,”IEICE Trans. Commun.,vol. E83-B, No. 7, pp. 1488-1496 (Jul. 2000).
J. Chao, “Saturn: A Terabit Packet Switch Using Dual Round-Robin,”IEEE Communications Magazine,pp. 78-84 (Dec. 2000).
G. Nong and M. Hamdi, “On the Provision of Quality-of-Service Guarantees for Input Queued Switches;”IEEE Commun. Mag.,pp. 62-69 (Dec. 2000).
E. Oki, Z. Jing, R. Rojas-Cessa, J. Chao, “Concurrent Round-Robin Dispatching Scheme in a Clos-Network Switch,”IEEE ICC 2001,pp. 106-112 (Jun. 2001).
E. Oki, R. Rojas-Cessa and H. J. Chao, “PCRRD: A Pipeline-Based Concurrent Round-Robin Dispatching Scheme for Clos-Network Switches,” pp. 1-18.
A. Smiljanić, “Flexible Bandwidth Allocation in Terabit Packet Switches,” pp. 233-239.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Scheduling the dispatch of cells in non-empty virtual output... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Scheduling the dispatch of cells in non-empty virtual output..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Scheduling the dispatch of cells in non-empty virtual output... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2729820

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.