Electrical transmission or interconnection systems – Switching systems – Plural switches
Reexamination Certificate
2002-05-09
2003-05-27
Sircus, Brian (Department: 2836)
Electrical transmission or interconnection systems
Switching systems
Plural switches
C307S125000, C307S141800
Reexamination Certificate
active
06570272
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a safety switching device for connection and safe disconnection of an electrical load, in particular an electrically driven machine, having a first and a second electromechanical switching element, whose operating contacts are arranged in series with one another between a first input terminal and an output terminal of the switching device, and having a second input terminal for a switching signal, which acts on the switch position of the operating contacts of the two switching elements.
Safety switching devices of this generic type are primarily used in the industrial field, in order safely disconnect (switch off, shut down) electrically driven machines, such as a press brake or a milling tool. They are particularly used in conjunction with a mechanically operable emergency off button, in order to disconnect the machine quickly and safely in an emergency situation. To this end, the power supply to the machine to be disconnected is routed via the operating contacts of the two electromechanical switching elements which have been mentioned. The power supply to the machine is interrupted as soon as even only one of the two switching elements opens its operating contacts.
One known problem with the switching elements that are used is that the opening and closing of a operating contact when voltage is applied to it can result in sparks being formed. Depending on the magnitude of the current which is being carried via the contact, the spark formation is pronounced to a lesser or greater extent. With very heavy currents, an arc is formed between the operating contacts and, as a result of its high temperature, it can lead to the operating contacts being welded to one another. This can lead to the operating contacts remaining firmly stuck to one another, so that it is no longer possible to open the switching element. As the strength of the current to be switched increases, measures are therefore required for arc quenching. The complexity of such measures increases as the strength of the current that is to be switched increases, so that switching elements for heavy and very heavy currents are correspondingly expensive.
In safety switching devices of the type mentioned initially, at least two switching elements are used in series, in order to ensure safe disconnection of the power supply even if the operating contacts of one switching element remain stuck to one another as a result of having been welded. In the case of the safety switching device disclosed in DE 197 36 183 C1, by way of example, two safety relays in series are used as switching elements.
Until now, two switching elements have always been used in this case which have the same nominal switching capacity with respect to the same load class. The nominal switching capacity here indicates the maximum current that a switching element can switch at a specific voltage and with a specific power factor cos &PHgr;, without being damaged. The load class defines the characteristics of the load to be switched, e.g. whether it is a purely resistive load (load class AC 1) or a somewhat inductive load (load class AC 3). Spark formation is particularly severely pronounced in the latter case.
The use of two switching elements with the same nominal switching capacity has the disadvantage that both switching elements are subject to the same relative loads with regard to their respective capacities. This means that both switching elements are subject to the same relative wear, and this also conceals the risk of the possibility of both switching elements failing at the same time, for example by the operating contacts welding in both switching elements in the same switching process.
Furthermore, use of two switching elements with the same nominal switching capacity results in the costs always rising by a factor of 2 when switching elements with a relatively high nominal switching capacity are required for switching relatively heavy currents.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to specify an alternative safety switching device which offers particularly high safety with regard to the possible welding of operating contacts when carrying heavy currents, and which is cost-effective at the same time.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, this object is achieved in that, with the safety switching device mentioned initially, the first switching element has a lower nominal switching capacity than the second switching element.
The new safety switching device differs from the previously known safety switching devices in that the two switching elements which are arranged in series with one another have different nominal switching capacities. This applies at least with reference to the same load class. This feature has the advantage that the switching elements used are subjected to relative loads of different severity with respect to their nominal switching capacities. This means that the wear on the two switching elements is different. Furthermore, this reduces the probability of both switching elements being subject to fail at the same time. This results in a particularly high safety margin against unobserved and dangerous welding of the operating contacts.
Furthermore, the measure has the advantage that the costs of a switching device for relatively heavy currents no longer rise more than proportionately. In consequence, it is possible to design a safety switching device of the type mentioned initially such that it is capable of switching heavy and very heavy currents already on its own.
The stated object is thus completely achieved.
In one refinement of the invention, the safety switching device has a timer unit which processes (delays) the switching signal such that, while connecting the load, it acts earlier on the operating contacts of the first switching element, and, while disconnecting the load, it acts later on the operating contacts of the first switching element than on the operating contacts of the second switching element.
This feature has the advantage that the first switching element is not switched on load during normal operation. In consequence, no sparks or arcs can be formed between its operating contacts, so that the wear on the first switching element is reduced considerably, and welding is also precluded. The first switching element thus has a long life despite its relatively low nominal switching capacity while, at the same time, the safety switching device can be designed overall for switching heavy currents. If the second switching element, which is always switched on load, were to fail as a result of the operating contacts being welded, it is sufficient that the previously “protected” first switching element can carry out one successful switching process on load, in which its operating contacts are opened.
In this refinement of the invention, as well, the two switching elements thus have different “life expectancies”, with the “daily load” in this case being applied to the stronger, second switching element. However, simultaneous failure of the two switching elements is in consequence once again virtually precluded. Furthermore, this refinement has the advantage that the first switching element may even be designed to have a lower nominal switching capacity than in comparable switching devices, in some circumstances. This is because the first switching element essentially needs to be able to carry out only one successful switching process on load. If its operating contacts are damaged in this switching process, this is irrelevant, since the safety switching device must be replaced in any case, owing to the defect in the second switching element. The first, very low-cost switching element thus acts as a type of fuse in this case, which can be damaged when it operates. The safety switching device in this refinement is, however, actually highly cost-effective for switching heavy and very heavy currents, since it requires only one switching element having the necessary very high nominal switching capacity.
In a further refinement
Harness & Dickey & Pierce P.L.C.
Pilz GmbH & Co.
Polk Sharon A.
Sircus Brian
LandOfFree
Safety switching device for connection and safe... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Safety switching device for connection and safe..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Safety switching device for connection and safe... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3045217