Cutlery – Razors – Multiple blade
Reexamination Certificate
1996-05-17
2001-04-10
Peterson, Kenneth E. (Department: 3724)
Cutlery
Razors
Multiple blade
C030S077000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06212777
ABSTRACT:
This invention is concerned with safety razors, and relates in particular to safety razors having blade units with a plurality of blades defining parallel sharpened edges arranged to pass in turn over a skin surface being shaved. As well known in the art blade units may be permanently attached to a razor handle or take the form of detachable cartridges intended to be replaced when the blade edges have become dulled. In either type of razor the blade unit may be fixed in position on the handle or pivotable about an axis parallel to the blade edges. The invention disclosed herein is applicable to all these forms of blade unit.
Safety razors having blade units with two blades have in recent years been sold in very large numbers and are generally acknowledged to give a better quality of shave, especially in terms of closeness, than single bladed razors. Furthermore, over the years there have been many written proposals to provide safety razors with several blades. A blade unit having many blades can produce a closer shave than a similar blade unit with only one or two blades. However, closeness of shave obtained is only one parameter by which razor users judge the performance of a razor. Adding extra blades can have a serious detrimental influence on other blade unit characteristics, most notably the drag forces experienced when the blade unit is moved over the skin, with the consequence that the overall performance of the blade unit can be markedly inferior despite a closer shave being obtainable. As a result, to our knowledge no razors with blade units incorporating more than two blades have been successfully marketed to date.
It has been found that with a blade unit comprising three blades, the frictional drag forces can be kept at an acceptable level while allowing an improved shaving efficiency, by setting the blades relative to each other and to guard and cap surfaces positioned in front of and behind the blade edges, according to a particular geometrical disposition. Thus, in accordance with the present invention there is provided a safety razor blade unit comprising a guard, a cap and a group of three blades with parallel sharpened edges located between the guard and cap, the first blade defining the edge nearest the guard having an exposure not greater than zero, and the third blade defining the blade nearest the cap having an exposure not less than zero.
The invention is not limited to blade units in which the blades are rigidly mounted in fixed position relative to the guard and/or cap. If the blades are capable of movement then the geometric parameters stipulated herein are those which apply when the blades are in their normal rest positions.
The blade exposure is defined to be the perpendicular distance or height of the blade edge measured with respect to a plane tangential to the skin contacting surfaces of the blade unit elements next in front of and next behind the edge. Therefore, for the three-bladed blade unit of the invention, the exposure of the first or primary blade is measured with reference to a plane tangential to the guard and the edge of the second blade, and the exposure of the third or tertiary blade is measured with reference to a plane tangential to the edge of the second blade and the cap.
It is preferred that the primary blade has a negative exposure, i.e. is located below the relevant tangent plane, and the tertiary blade a positive exposure, i.e. is located above the relevant tangent plane. This arrangement has the effect of tending to equalise the work performed by the respective blades, since in a multiple blade razor the leading blade has a tendency to do most of the work. Of course the exposure of the primary blade must not be so low that it will not make effective contact with the skin surface being shaved. The minimum acceptable exposure will be influenced by other blade unit dimensions, such as the distance from the skin engaging surface of the guard to the edge, i.e. “the span” of the primary blade. As referred to herein, “the span” means the distance from the blade edge to the skin contacting element immediately in front of that edge as measured along a tangent line extending between the said element and the blade edge. Assuming the span is not large, i.e. not more than about 1.5 mm, an exposure not less than −0.2 mm is satisfactory for the primary blade. For a span of about 0.7 mm an exposure of about −0.04 mm has been found to be very appropriate for the primary blade. With the exposure of the primary blade being not greater than zero, the span should not be very small and a minimum span of about 0.5 mm is therefore proposed. It is beneficial for the primary blade span to be smaller than, e.g. approximately half the span between the edges of the primary and secondary blades and the span between the secondary and tertiary blades.
Similarly, practical limitations will establish a maximum acceptable exposure for the tertiary blade. It should not be so great that the tertiary blade carries too high a risk of cutting the skin, for example. It is believed a maximum exposure of around +0.2 mm will ensure satisfactory results. An appropriate span for the tertiary blade is in the range of 1.0 to 2.0 mm, which is also applicable to the second blade.
The exposure of the second or secondary blade is preferably not less than the exposure of the primary blade and not greater than the exposure of the tertiary blade. A steadily increasing blade exposure has been found most effective. Therefore, the value of the exposure of the secondary blade is ideally approximately half way between the exposure values for the primary and tertiary blades, and very satisfactory test results have been obtained with all three blade edges lying in a common plane. In most embodiments a secondary blade exposure substantially equal to zero will be very satisfactory. We recommend that the tertiary blade exposure be a positive value equal in magnitude to the negative exposure of the primary blade.
Another factor which can influence drag forces associated with the blades is the shaving angle, i.e. the angle between a plane bisecting the blade tip and the plane with respect to which the blade exposure is measured. However, the blade shaving angles are not critical and values within a broad range are acceptable, for example 19-28°. It is not necessary for all three blades to have the same shaving angles, and the most effective values may depend on the span and exposure selected for each blade.
With a three-bladed safety razor blade unit having the blades disposed as specified herein we have found an enhanced overall shaving performance in comparison to a two-bladed razor.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1920711 (1933-08-01), Pelizzola
patent: 2487886 (1949-11-01), McCune
patent: 3660893 (1972-05-01), Welsh
patent: 3777396 (1973-12-01), Simonetti
patent: 3786563 (1974-01-01), Dorion, Jr. et al.
patent: 3842502 (1974-10-01), Hagan
patent: 3938250 (1976-02-01), Pery
patent: 4146958 (1979-04-01), Chen et al.
patent: 4200976 (1980-05-01), Gooding
patent: 4932122 (1990-06-01), Shurland et al.
patent: 5067238 (1991-11-01), Miller et al.
patent: 5426851 (1995-06-01), Gilder
patent: B1 4407067 (1987-05-01), Trotta
patent: 1369101 (1972-07-01), None
patent: WO 92/17322 (1922-10-01), None
Gilder Bernard
Terry John Charles
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Peterson Kenneth E.
The Gillette Company
LandOfFree
Safety razors does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Safety razors, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Safety razors will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2553932