Safety judgment method, safety judgment system, safety...

Information security – Access control or authentication – Network

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C713S156000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08032929

ABSTRACT:
Security of an information processing apparatus is ensured by performing biological information authentication and collecting the environment information about the information processing apparatus. The information processing apparatus transmits the collected environment information to a first authentication apparatus. An electronic certificate issued by a second authentication apparatus and information encrypted with a secret key issued by the second authentication apparatus are transmitted to the first authentication apparatus. The first authentication apparatus acquires the public key of the second authentication apparatus and the public key of the information processing apparatus so as to decrypt the encrypted information, and judges whether or not the decrypted information is proper. The first authentication apparatus refers to an environment information database and the transmitted information, and judges whether or not the transmitted environment information is proper. When all the authentications by the biological information authentication, environment information authentication and electronic certificate authentication are successful, the information processing apparatus is judged to be safe.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6016476 (2000-01-01), Maes et al.
patent: 6289382 (2001-09-01), Bowman-Amuah
patent: 6434561 (2002-08-01), Durst et al.
patent: 6842906 (2005-01-01), Bowman-Amuah
patent: 7162649 (2007-01-01), Ide et al.
patent: 2002/0157015 (2002-10-01), Gilbert et al.
patent: 2003/0154381 (2003-08-01), Ouye et al.
patent: 2004/0243801 (2004-12-01), Chen et al.
patent: 1 237 091 (2002-09-01), None
patent: 1 271 436 (2003-01-01), None
patent: 2 348 309 (2000-09-01), None
patent: 3-058174 (1991-03-01), None
patent: 5-12000 (1993-01-01), None
patent: 9-134260 (1997-05-01), None
patent: 9-190353 (1997-07-01), None
patent: 10-116237 (1998-05-01), None
patent: 10-283190 (1998-10-01), None
patent: 11-331142 (1999-11-01), None
patent: 2000-004225 (2000-01-01), None
patent: 2000-57341 (2000-02-01), None
patent: 2000-101568 (2000-04-01), None
patent: 2000-308138 (2000-11-01), None
patent: 2001-5671 (2001-01-01), None
patent: 2001-117876 (2001-04-01), None
patent: 2002-82914 (2002-03-01), None
patent: 2002-101459 (2002-04-01), None
patent: 2002-190026 (2002-07-01), None
patent: 2002-208986 (2002-07-01), None
patent: 2002-353960 (2002-12-01), None
patent: 02/03178 (2002-01-01), None
patent: 02/13444 (2002-02-01), None
patent: 02/17048 (2002-02-01), None
patent: 02/084565 (2002-10-01), None
patent: 03/007538 (2003-01-01), None
Office Action mailed on Oct. 28, 2008 and issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-323200.
Search Report of European Published Application 07 10 9695 (dated Jul. 26, 2007). (8pg).
Communication from European Patent Office for European patent application No. 03-256 912.1-2224 dated Jul. 25, 2007. (5pg).
Communication from European Patent Office regarding application No. 03256912.1-2212 dated Oct. 12, 2004. (1pg).
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2006-060009; dated Jul. 6, 2009.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Safety judgment method, safety judgment system, safety... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Safety judgment method, safety judgment system, safety..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Safety judgment method, safety judgment system, safety... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4299425

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.