Dynamic magnetic information storage or retrieval – Automatic control of a recorder mechanism – Controlling the head
Reexamination Certificate
1998-12-18
2001-09-04
Hudspeth, David (Department: 2753)
Dynamic magnetic information storage or retrieval
Automatic control of a recorder mechanism
Controlling the head
C360S060000, C360S075000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06285522
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to the field of disc drive storage devices, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to improving data transfer performance of a disc drive by detecting and compensating rotational vibration by demodulating a frequency pattern written to a disc recording surface at a constant frequency.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Disc drives are digital data storage devices which enable users of computer systems to store and retrieve large amounts of data in a fast and efficient manner. Disc drives of the present generation have data storage capacities in excess of several gigabytes (GB) and can transfer data at sustained rates of several megabytes (MB) per second.
A typical disc drive is provided with a plurality of magnetic recording discs which are mounted to a rotatable hub of a spindle motor for rotation at a constant, high speed. An array of read/write heads are disposed adjacent surfaces of the discs to transfer data between the discs and a host computer. The heads are radially positioned over the discs by a closed loop, digital servo system, and are caused to fly proximate the surfaces of the discs upon air bearings established by air currents set up by the high speed rotation of the discs.
A plurality of nominally concentric tracks are defined on each disc surface. A preamp and driver circuit generates write currents that are used by the head to selectively magnetize the tracks during a data write operation and amplifies read signals detected by the head during a data read operation. A read/write channel and interface circuit are operably connected to the preamp and driver circuit to transfer the data between the discs and the host computer.
A rigid housing is provided to support the spindle motor and the actuator, with the housing cooperating with a top cover to form an internal controlled environment to minimize particulate contamination of the discs and heads. A printed circuit board is mounted adjacent an exterior surface of the housing to accommodate various disc drive control electronics, including the aforementioned servo circuit, read/write channel and interface circuit.
Disc drives are often used in a stand-alone fashion, such as in a typical personal computer (PC) or portable data processing/communication device where a single disc drive is utilized as the primary data storage peripheral. However, in applications requiring vast amounts of data storage capacity or high input/output (I/O) bandwidth, a plurality of drives are often arranged into a multi-drive array, sometimes referred to as a RAID (“Redundant Array of Inexpensive Discs”; also “Redundant Array of Independent Discs”). A seminal article proposing various RAID architectures was published in 1987 by Patterson et al., entitled “A Case for Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Discs (RAID)”, Report No. UCB/CSD 87/391, December 1987, Computer Science Division (EECS), University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Since their introduction, RAIDs have found widespread use in a variety of applications requiring significant data transfer and storage capacities. It is presently common to incorporate several tens, if not hundreds, of drives into a single RAID. While advantageously facilitating generation of large scale data storage systems, though, the coupling of multiple drives within the same enclosure can also undesirably increase the effects of vibrations from excitation sources within the drives, such as spindle motors used to rotate the discs and actuators used to move the heads to various tracks on the discs. Such vibrations can be transmitted from drive to drive through chassis mounts used to secure the drives within the enclosure.
Vibrational components can be characterized as being either translational or rotational in nature. Translational vibrations tend to move a disc drive housing back and forth along a plane of the drive, whereas rotational vibrations tend to rotate a disc drive housing about an axis normal to a plane of the drive. Translational vibrations will generally have little effect upon the ability of the actuator to maintain the heads at a selected position with respect to the discs, as the discs and the actuator will both respond to the movement induced by such translational vibrations. However, such is not true with rotational vibrations.
Even with a nominally balanced actuator, rotational vibrations will tend to move the discs relative to the actuator because the actuator, acting as a free body, remains essentially undisturbed due to inertial effects while the discs, mounted to the housing, are displaced by imparted rotational vibration. When sufficiently severe, such movement can cause an “off-track” condition whereby a head is moved away from a selected track being followed. As will be recognized, an off-track condition can adversely affect the ability of the drive to transfer data between the discs and host device.
The problems associated with rotational vibrations are well known in the disc drive art. Compensation attempts have included use of sensors that can detect the presence of rotational vibration in a disc drive, such as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,235,472 issued Aug. 10, 1993 to Smith, assigned to the assignee of the present invention. Efforts to both detect and compensate rotational vibration using feedforward control include discussions by White and Tomizuka, “Increased Disturbance Rejection in Magnetic Disk Drives by Acceleration Feedforward Control,” and Abramovitch, “Rejecting Rotational Disturbances on Small Disk Drives Using Rotational Accelerometers.” Both of these papers were presented at the 13
th
Triennial World Congress, San Francisco, U.S.A., 1996.
While operative, there are limitations with these and other prior art approaches to minimizing the effects of rotational vibration in a disc drive. Sensors that specifically detect rotational vibration are commercially available, but are often prohibitively expensive for use in low cost disc drive designs and require active testing in a test bed to properly calibrate. Such sensors may include a piezoelectric polymer film disposed between metallic layers that detects rotational vibration in response to torsion induced on the film, as disclosed by the aforementioned Smith U.S. Pat. No. 5,235,472; another construction uses multiple piezoelectric transducers within a single component enclosure to detect rotation in relation to differences in detected motion among the transducers.
Alternatively, rotational sensors can be formed from two or more discrete linear accelerometers which detect rotational vibration in response to differences in the detected motion between the devices. While potentially less expensive to implement than an integrated rotational sensor, commercially available discrete linear accelerometers (piezo or similar construction) can have significant part-to-part output gain variation characteristics, making such unsuitable for use in a drive to detect rotational vibration without special screening and trimming operations to obtain matched sets of accelerometers.
By way of example, the aforementioned White et al. and Abramovitch references are illustrative of conventional approaches requiring use of relatively precise (and therefore expensive) accelerometers, as well as a calibration routine requiring use of a shaker table to impart vibrations of known characteristics. Such considerations make these approaches undesirable for high volume disc drive manufacturing, and prevent future adaptation of the response characteristics of a given drive to its subsequent field environment.
These references are also limited to compensating for rotational effects and do not directly address translational effects. Significantly, though, translational effects have also been found to contribute to off-track errors due to actuator imbalance (i.e., dynamic imbalance about the actuator rotational axis) and non-zero actuator bearing frictional forces. In practice, induced vibration is seldom purely rotational or translational, but rather usually includes a combination of both.
Mo
Douglas D. Brent
Francis Stuart K.
McKenzie Lealon R.
Wilson Nathaniel B.
Crowe & Dunlevy
Habermehl James L
Hudspeth David
Seagate Technology LLC
LandOfFree
Rotational vibration compensation using a dedicated surface... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Rotational vibration compensation using a dedicated surface..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Rotational vibration compensation using a dedicated surface... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2548896