Data processing: vehicles – navigation – and relative location – Vehicle control – guidance – operation – or indication
Reexamination Certificate
2001-11-05
2003-03-04
Camby, Richard M. (Department: 3661)
Data processing: vehicles, navigation, and relative location
Vehicle control, guidance, operation, or indication
C701S038000, C701S041000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06529803
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates generally to a dynamic behavior control apparatus for an automotive vehicle, and more specifically, to a method and apparatus for controlling the roll characteristics of the vehicle by controlling the steering direction of the vehicle.
2. Background
Dynamic control systems for automotive vehicles have recently begun to be offered on various products. Dynamic control systems typically control the yaw of the vehicle by controlling the braking effort at the various wheels of the vehicle. Yaw control systems typically compare the desired direction of the vehicle based upon the steering wheel angle and the direction of travel. By regulating the amount of braking at each corner of the vehicle, the desired direction of travel may be maintained. Typically, the dynamic control systems do not address roll of the vehicle. For high profile vehicles in particular, it would be desirable to control the roll over characteristic of the vehicle to maintain the vehicle position with respect to the road. That is, it is desirable to maintain contact of each of the four tires of the vehicle on the road.
Vehicle rollover and tilt control (or body roll) are distinguishable dynamic characteristics. Tilt control maintains the vehicle body on a plane or nearly on a plane parallel to the road surface. Roll over control is maintaining the vehicle wheels on the road surface. One system of tilt control is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,869,943. The “943 patent uses the combination of yaw control and tilt control to maintain the vehicle body horizontal while turning. The system is used in conjunction with the front outside wheels only. To control tilt, a brake force is applied to the front outside wheels of a turn. In certain maneuvers, however, application of brakes may not be desirable. It would therefore be desirable to provide a roll stability system that detects a potential rollover condition and temporarily applies steering in a desired direction to counter rollover.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a roll control system for use in a vehicle using steering direction.
In one aspect of the invention, stability control system for an automotive vehicle includes a plurality of sensors sensing the dynamic conditions of the vehicle and a controller that controls a steering force or effort change and direction to reduce a tire moment so the net moment of the vehicle is counter to the roll direction. The sensors may include a speed sensor, a lateral acceleration sensor, a longitudinal acceleration sensor, a roll rate sensor, and a yaw rate sensor. A controller is coupled to the sensors to determine a roll angle estimate. The controller determines the direction and steering effort change in response to the relative roll angle estimate to counter roll.
In a further aspect of the invention, a method of controlling roll stability of the vehicle comprises the steps of:
sensing the position of the rear wheel steering actuator;
sensing an impending rollover;
generating a tire moment counter to a roll direction by controlling the rear wheel steering actuator in response to said impending rollover and said position of the rear wheel steering actuator.
One advantage of the invention is that such systems may be easily implemented into a rear steer-by-wire system.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2917126 (1959-12-01), Phillips
patent: 3608925 (1971-09-01), Murphy
patent: 3948567 (1976-04-01), Kasselmann et al.
patent: 3972543 (1976-08-01), Presley et al.
patent: 4023864 (1977-05-01), Lang et al.
patent: RE30550 (1981-03-01), Reise
patent: 4480714 (1984-11-01), Yabuta et al.
patent: 4592565 (1986-06-01), Eagle
patent: 4809183 (1989-02-01), Eckert
patent: 4898431 (1990-02-01), Karnopp et al.
patent: 4964679 (1990-10-01), Rath
patent: 4976330 (1990-12-01), Matsumoto
patent: 4998593 (1991-03-01), Karnopp et al.
patent: 5089967 (1992-02-01), Haseda et al.
patent: 5224765 (1993-07-01), Matsuda
patent: 5311956 (1994-05-01), Sugiyama
patent: 5335176 (1994-08-01), Nakamura
patent: 5408411 (1995-04-01), Nakamura et al.
patent: 5446658 (1995-08-01), Pastor et al.
patent: 5610575 (1997-03-01), Gioutsos
patent: 5634698 (1997-06-01), Cao et al.
patent: 5640324 (1997-06-01), Inagaki
patent: 5671982 (1997-09-01), Wanke
patent: 5707117 (1998-01-01), Hu et al.
patent: 5707120 (1998-01-01), Monzaki et al.
patent: 5732378 (1998-03-01), Eckert et al.
patent: 5732379 (1998-03-01), Eckert et al.
patent: 5737224 (1998-04-01), Jeenicke et al.
patent: 5742918 (1998-04-01), Ashrafi et al.
patent: 5762406 (1998-06-01), Yasui et al.
patent: 5782543 (1998-07-01), Monzaki et al.
patent: 5809434 (1998-09-01), Ashrafi et al.
patent: 5825284 (1998-10-01), Dunwoody et al.
patent: 5857535 (1999-01-01), Brooks
patent: 5869943 (1999-02-01), Nakashima et al.
patent: 5890084 (1999-03-01), Halasz et al.
patent: 5893896 (1999-04-01), Imamura et al.
patent: 5931546 (1999-08-01), Nakashima et al.
patent: 6002974 (1999-12-01), Schiffman
patent: 6002975 (1999-12-01), Schiffman et al.
patent: 6038495 (2000-03-01), Schiffman
patent: 6065558 (2000-05-01), Wielenga
patent: 6263261 (2001-07-01), Brown et al.
patent: 36 16 907 (1987-11-01), None
patent: 38 15 938 (1989-11-01), None
patent: 43 21 571 (1994-01-01), None
patent: 42 27 886 (1994-02-01), None
patent: 42 28 893 (1994-03-01), None
patent: 43 35 979 (1995-04-01), None
patent: 196 02 879 (1997-08-01), None
patent: 197 51 867 (1999-05-01), None
patent: 197 51 891 (1999-05-01), None
patent: 197 51 925 (1999-05-01), None
patent: 197 51 935 (1999-05-01), None
patent: 198 02 041 (1999-07-01), None
patent: 199 07 633 (1999-10-01), None
patent: 197 51 839 (2000-05-01), None
patent: 0758601 (1997-02-01), None
patent: 24 25 342 (1979-12-01), None
patent: 2257403 (1993-01-01), None
patent: 2316455 (1998-02-01), None
patent: 63116918 (1988-05-01), None
patent: 63151539 (1988-06-01), None
patent: 63203456 (1988-08-01), None
patent: 1101238 (1989-04-01), None
patent: 2171373 (1990-07-01), None
patent: 3042360 (1991-02-01), None
patent: 3045452 (1991-02-01), None
patent: 4008837 (1992-01-01), None
patent: 5016699 (1993-01-01), None
patent: 5254406 (1993-10-01), None
patent: 6278586 (1994-10-01), None
patent: 6312612 (1994-11-01), None
patent: 8080825 (1996-03-01), None
patent: 9005352 (1997-01-01), None
patent: 10024819 (1998-01-01), None
patent: 10278762 (1998-10-01), None
patent: 10329682 (1998-12-01), None
patent: 11011272 (1999-01-01), None
patent: 11170992 (1999-06-01), None
patent: 11254992 (1999-09-01), None
patent: 11255093 (1999-09-01), None
patent: 11304663 (1999-10-01), None
patent: 11304662 (1999-11-01), None
patent: 816849 (1981-03-01), None
patent: WO 99/30942 (1999-06-01), None
A Method For Reducing On-Road Rollovers—Anti-Rollover Braking, Thomas J. Wielenga, Dynamotive, L.L.C., International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, Mar. 1-4, 1999.
Brown Todd Allen
Meyers Joseph Carr
Brown Gregory P.
Camby Richard M.
Ford Global Technologies Inc.
LandOfFree
Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle having... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle having..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle having... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3036849