Optical: systems and elements – Single channel simultaneously to or from plural channels – By surface composed of lenticular elements
Reexamination Certificate
2003-04-08
2004-10-26
Schwartz, Jordan M. (Department: 2873)
Optical: systems and elements
Single channel simultaneously to or from plural channels
By surface composed of lenticular elements
C359S652000, C359S619000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06809868
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a process for producing a rod lens array in which a multiple of gradient index rod lenses are precision arranged parallel to each other at given spacings and fixed between two side plates (frames) as they are buried in a resin. The rod lens array is typically useful as an optical component for an image writing system in an electrophoto-graphic printer.
The rod lens array is an optical component that has a multiple of tiny gradient index rod lenses arranged in alignment so that they combine together to form a single continuous erected unit-magnification image. The rod lens array has a short optical pathlength and needs no inverting mirror; because of the size-reducing feature, the rod lens array is commonly used as an optical component not only for an image reading system in an image scanner, a copier, etc. but also for an image writing system that forms a latent image on a photoreceptor in accordance with supplied image signals. Recent models of electrophotographic printer have been improved to achieve high image resolution comparable to that offered by silver halide photography. This has accordingly increased the requirement for higher precision in latent image and, hence, for better quality of image writing optical components in terms of the precision of the position in which image is formed.
A common process for the production of the rod lens array includes an assembly step in which a multiple of lens preformers are arranged in contact with each other and fixed between an upper and a lower side plate (frame plate) to form a block, an impregnation and curing step in which a resin is impregnated between the individual lens preformers in the block, and a cutting step in which the block is cut to a specified lens length. The side plates are usually fiber glass-reinforced plastic laminated plates (FRP plates).
In the assembly step, two methods are commonly used. In one method, a plurality of gradient index rod lenses are aligned on a flat frame such that their outer peripheral surfaces contact each other and they are altogether fixed to maintain the aligned state (this method is hereunder referred to as the “diameter referenced method”). The other method uses an aligning tool having a plurality of V-shaped grooves cut side by side in the surface of a platen on specified pitches, and gradient index rod lenses placed in the respective V-shaped grooves are fixed altogether to maintain their aligned state (this method is hereunder referred to as the “mechanically referenced method”; see JP 9-90105 A).
The surface of an FRP plate has fine periodical asperities due to the texture of the woven glass fabric used in its production and hence the individual lens preformers are likely to be offset positionally during the assembly and impregnation steps. Positional off set also occurs due to the warpage of lens preformers and their surface roughness. In addition, both the diameter referenced method and the mechanically referenced method have their own problems.
Consider, for example, an image writing system of the type shown in
FIG. 11
; a light emitting portion (LED device)
10
blinks in accordance with image signals and a rod lens
12
forms a latent image on an imaging surface (photo receptor drum)
14
. Any deviation from the desired alignment of rod lenses
12
results in a great variation in the potential at which the latent image is formed on the photoreceptor drum. On account of this variation in the imaging position that results from misalignment of the rod lenses, the image resolution that can be achieved by the image writing optical system is limited.
To make an acceptable rod lens array, gradient index rod lenses must be aligned such that adjacent lenses have a constant axial spacing (or “alignment pitch”) and that there be neither inclination in the plane of alignment (which is hereunder referred to as “horizontal inclination”) nor inclination in a direction normal to the plane of alignment (which is hereunder referred to as “height inclination”). The height inclination can be suppressed in the diameter referenced method. On the other hand, due to contact between gradient index rod lenses, a horizontally inclined lens affects an adjacent lens and the lenses taken as a whole may occasionally be inclined horizontally to suffer “axial displacement”. In the case of a printer or facsimile, this causes an image to be formed in a position far distant from where it should he.
The mechanically referenced method can provide higher precision in lens alignment. On the other hand, individual gradient index rod lenses sometimes fail to be placed uniformly within V-shaped grooves in the platen, causing one lens to be inclined with respect to another. Since it is unavoidable that lens preformers vary in diameter, the setting of the pitch between grooves in the platen must not be smaller than a maximum value for the variation in the diameter of lens preformers. As a result, very small gaps occur between arranged lens preformers and positional offset may occur during the mounting of side plates. In the “partial” burial step where one side plate is mounted, the grooved platen adequately protects against positional offset but in the “complete” burial step where the grooved platen is removed and the other side plate is mounted, the precision in the alignment of lens preformers may drop since there is nothing that controls the positional offset. In a printer or facsimile, this is a cause of failures such as an overlap of pixels.
Next, we describe the positional offset of rod lenses and their departure from the desired alignment on account of their surface roughness. The rod lenses to be used in the rod lens array are mainly produced by ion-exchange. As shown graphically in
FIG. 17
, a beam of incident light which falls on an end face of a rod lens
12
at an angle smaller than its angular aperture &thgr;
0
is an effective ray
21
on the other hand, a beam of light incident at an angle greater than &thgr;
0
undergoes regular reflection at the internal specular surface of the rod lens
12
which is manufactured by drawing. The reflected beam is so-called “stray” light
22
which takes no part in image formation and therefore lowers the contrast of the rod lens
12
. Furthermore, the rod lens array is constructed by a multiple of rod lenses
12
and the stray light
22
occurring in individual rod lenses
12
will reduce the overall contrast of the rod lens array.
In known rod lens arrays, a multiple of rod lenses arranged in one or two rows are fixed between two frame plates and a black silicone resin is filled between lenses and between each frame plate and lenses.
FIG. 18
shows a conventional method of removing stray light
22
by allowing it to scatter. To this end, the peripheral surface of the rod lens
12
is removed to some extent by a surface treatment and tiny asperities
23
are formed around it (see, for example, JP 58-38901 A). The stray light
22
incident on the surface of the area where asperities
23
are formed is scattered as indicated by
25
. In addition, the black silicone resin
24
covering the peripheral surface of the rod lens
12
absorbs the scattered light
25
, eventually suppressing the stray light
22
.
In fact, however, the peripheral surface of the conventional rod lens has a profile as shown in FIG.
19
and suffers the following disadvantages.
FIG. 19
shows the roughness, or the degree of unevenness, of the peripheral surface of a rectilinear area in the longitudinal direction of the conventional rod lens.
The first problem arises from the fact that the amount of removal from the peripheral lens surface varies from one lens to another and so does the lens diameter. If the rod lenses are arranged with reference to the frame plates, there occurs a departure from the desired lens arrangement due to the variation in lens diameter and the optical axis of one rod lens is inclined with respect to the optical axis of another.
Secondly, due to the lens-to-lens difference in the roughness of the peripheral lens sur
Fukuzawa Takashi
Iki Koichiro
Ogi Shuya
Sasaki Kiyotaka
Wakisaka Masahide
Nippon Sheet Glass Co. Ltd.
Schwartz Jordan M.
Stultz Jessica
Whitham Curtis & Christofferson, P.C.
LandOfFree
Rod lens array and a process for producing the same does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Rod lens array and a process for producing the same, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Rod lens array and a process for producing the same will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3286049