Robust signaling tone duration measurement

Multiplex communications – Generalized orthogonal or special mathematical techniques – Fourier transform

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C370S484000, C379S283000, C379S351000, C379S386000, C379S406130

Reexamination Certificate

active

06671252

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the measurement of an alerting or other signaling tone. More particularly, it relates to a versatile method and apparatus capable of accurately measuring the duration of a tone burst, even in an environment including speech signals.
2. Background of Related Art
While the present invention relates to tone detection in general, it and its background are described with respect to a particular embodiment useful for detecting alerting tones relating to the reception of call related information, e.g., Caller ID information.
As is well known, Caller ID services permit a telephone customer to learn the identity of, or at least the originating telephone number of, a party seeking to place a telephone call to the customer. An older service referred to as Call-Waiting (CW) alerts a customer engaged in a telephone connection to another party, that a third party desires to place a telephone call to the customer. A newer service offered in telephone systems combines caller identification and call-waiting services, to not only alert a customer during a telephone connection that a third party desires to establish a connection, but also transmits to the CPE, caller identification information identifying the telephone number and/or name of the third party. This latter service is sometimes referred to as CIDCW (caller ID and call waiting) or Caller ID Type II.
Participation in a system with Caller ID and Call Waiting requires not only the presence of a central office capable of providing such service, but also CPE capable of receiving and transmitting the necessary control, acknowledgment and data signals. The general sequence of events during a telephone call in which the customer has Caller ID and Call Waiting service is as follows.
When a customer is currently engaged in a telephone conversation with a second party, a third party desiring to complete a telephone call with the customer may dial the customer's number. During the customer's conversation with the second party, the central office sends a subscriber alerting signal (SAS) alerting the customer that a third party desires to make a connection with the customer. The subscriber alerting signal is typically a single tone 400-hertz signal of about 500 milliseconds in duration, that is audible to the customer.
The central office follows the transmission of the subscriber alerting signal with the transmission of a CPE alerting signal (CAS). Similar to a dual tone multi-frequency signal, the CPE alerting signal has 2130 hertz and 2750 hertz components and optimally lasts for 80 milliseconds. Upon detection of the CPE alerting signal, the CPE sends a CAS acknowledgment signal (CAS ACK) to the central office, signaling to the central office that the CPE is ready to receive Caller ID information regarding the third party.
At the time the CPE transmits the CAS acknowledgment signal, it also disables the voice transmission transducer in the CPE. While the central office maintains the connection with the second party, it suppresses the CAS acknowledgment signal from the transmission sent to the second party. When the central office receives the CAS acknowledgment signal, it sends the caller identification information to the customer in the form of a frequency shift keyed (FSK) signal. The CPE can then display the caller identification information on a display unit as is known in the art. Full communication is established with the second party after receipt of the caller identification information. The customer, through the CPE can then decide how to handle the third party, such as placing the second party on hold and establishing the connection with the third party, for example.
Because of the proximity of the CPE alerting signal to voice frequencies transmitted and received in typical telephone systems, reliable detection of the CPE alerting signal can sometimes be a problem in conventional CPEs. For instance, conventional tone detectors used in this capacity sometimes experience “talkoff” episodes in which CPE alerting signals are falsely detected, and “talkdown” episodes in which actual CPE alerting signals are missed due to interference with speech. This erroneous operation is often the result of harmonic components of speech signals occurring in the frequency ranges of a tone signal such as the standard CPE alerting signal.
One conventional approach to eliminating talkoff and talkdown episodes during CPE alerting signal detection is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,263,084 issued Nov. 16, 1993 to Chaput et al. The Chaput approach appears to be as follows. When the CPE receives the subscriber alerting signal, it mutes its handset for a predetermined period of time to reduce or eliminate background noise, in expectation of the occurrence of a CPE alerting signal conforming to known standards. The muting interval must be chosen to be of sufficient duration to reliably allow silence for CPE alerting signals of a given tolerance (i.e., beginning time, duration). Unfortunately, this technique requires a prior knowledge of the occurrence of an incoming tone signal. Moreover, the muting interval is typically long enough to be noticed by and cause an annoyance to customers engaged in a telephone conversation.
A different conventional approach employs the use of brute-force digital signal processing (DSP) methods, such as the use of fast Fourier transforms (FFTs), to continuously analyze each frame of a digitized signal for the presence of any/all expected tones.
Many people have made telephone calls, enjoying the convenience of communications using a telephone or other customer premises equipment. Moreover, everyone has heard some type of alerting tone, call progress tone (CPT) or other signaling tone from a central office, be it a busy tone, a dial tone, or other single or dual frequency tone used to signal customer premises equipment or a central office over a telephone line.
Generally, alerting or other signaling tones are either continuous, periodic, intermittent, or single pulse only. The duration of any particular tone pulse may be very short, e.g., 40 milliseconds (mS) or less. Generally, a minimum length of a particular tone pulse is conventionally established to provide a conventional tone detection algorithm sufficient time to detect the presence of the tone.
FIG. 4
shows a conventional tone detector
902
adapted to detect the presence of a particular tone (i.e., a particular alerting or other signaling tone) in an input signal typically received over a telephone line, and output either a “tone detected” or a “tone not detected” signal. Many tone detectors contain a plurality of algorithms or parameters to accommodate the detection of a plurality of expected alerting tone or other tone signals. Some signaling tones require detection of more than one frequency component, e.g., Dual Tone Multiple Frequency (DTMF) signals.
Tone detectors (e.g., DTMF dialer and call progress tone detectors) are common in most customer premises equipment. Early customer premises equipment included analog filters for detecting a tone, but more recent customer premises equipment includes a processor with digital tone detection software. Digital tone detectors usually include an algorithm implementing a discrete Fourier transform (DFT).
A DFT processes digital samples of the input signal on a frame-by-frame basis. The DFT processes each sample frame of a given length to detect the presence of a particular frequency component in the input signal to a resolution corresponding to the length of the data frame. If a particular frequency component above a predetermined energy threshold is detected in the processed frame having the proper duration, then a “tone detected” or similar signal is output.
FIG. 5
shows an exemplary sampling and processing of an input signal on a frame-by-frame basis through a DFT.
In particular, a signal including a tone pulse
1002
shown in waveform (a) of
FIG. 5
is input to a DFT adapted to detect the presence of the tone pulse
1002
. In a wo

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Robust signaling tone duration measurement does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Robust signaling tone duration measurement, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Robust signaling tone duration measurement will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3178558

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.