Rich end-user data views

Details Rich end-user data views Rich end-user data views

2005-04-01

2011-11-01

Yigdall, Michael J (Department: 2192)

Data processing: software development, installation, and managem

Software program development tool

Programming language

C715S747000, C715S765000, C707S821000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08051406

ABSTRACT:
A system and/or methodology that enables personalization as a platform service for applications via a rich data view. More particularly, the subject invention provides for a rich data view to be rendered to an end-user whereas management of the data can be effected (e.g., personalized) thereafter. In other words, the invention enables a user to establish and access personalized mechanisms via a rich data view. The personalized mechanisms are based upon rule-based logic with respect to application data types.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5446885 (1995-08-01), Moore
patent: 5495603 (1996-02-01), Fruchtman
patent: 5630127 (1997-05-01), Moore
patent: 5751914 (1998-05-01), Coley
patent: 5828376 (1998-10-01), Solimene
patent: 5831606 (1998-11-01), Nakajima et al.
patent: 5917489 (1999-06-01), Thurlow et al.
patent: 5925108 (1999-07-01), Johnson
patent: 5966707 (1999-10-01), Van Huben
patent: 6061740 (2000-05-01), Ferguson
patent: 6133915 (2000-10-01), Arcuri
patent: 6142684 (2000-11-01), Kirshenbaum
patent: 6233726 (2001-05-01), Bowman
patent: 6237135 (2001-05-01), Timbol
patent: 6266811 (2001-07-01), Nabahi
patent: 6272521 (2001-08-01), Jablonski
patent: 6272559 (2001-08-01), Jones
patent: 6292937 (2001-09-01), Sakata
patent: 6332163 (2001-12-01), Bowman-Amuah
patent: 6341369 (2002-01-01), Degenaro
patent: 6401097 (2002-06-01), McCotter et al.
patent: 6407753 (2002-06-01), Budinsky
patent: 6519597 (2003-02-01), Cheng
patent: 6633888 (2003-10-01), Kobayashi
patent: 6633889 (2003-10-01), Dessloch
patent: 6636845 (2003-10-01), Chau
patent: 6643633 (2003-11-01), Chau
patent: 6734882 (2004-05-01), Becker
patent: 6738964 (2004-05-01), Zink
patent: 6892228 (2005-05-01), Penders
patent: 6944819 (2005-09-01), Banatwala et al.
patent: 6965889 (2005-11-01), Serrano-Morales et al.
patent: 6976020 (2005-12-01), Anthony
patent: 7181694 (2007-02-01), Reiss et al.
patent: 7240072 (2007-07-01), McKnight
patent: 7310443 (2007-12-01), Kris et al.
patent: 7373350 (2008-05-01), Arone et al.
patent: 7409405 (2008-08-01), Masinter et al.
patent: 7565663 (2009-07-01), Knight
patent: 2002/0019886 (2002-02-01), Sanghvi et al.
patent: 2003/0081011 (2003-05-01), Sheldon et al.
patent: 2003/0192027 (2003-10-01), Porter
patent: 2004/0012627 (2004-01-01), Zakharia et al.
patent: 2004/0098357 (2004-05-01), Higgins
patent: 2004/0143604 (2004-07-01), Glenner
patent: 2004/0155901 (2004-08-01), McKee et al.
patent: 2004/0193575 (2004-09-01), Chen
patent: 2004/0205706 (2004-10-01), Portwood
patent: 2004/0216086 (2004-10-01), Bau
patent: 2005/0060281 (2005-03-01), Bucher et al.
patent: 2005/0091181 (2005-04-01), McKee et al.
patent: 2005/0222996 (2005-10-01), Yalamanchi
patent: 2005/0223100 (2005-10-01), Chen
patent: 2005/0262481 (2005-11-01), Coulson
patent: 2006/0129584 (2006-06-01), Hoang
patent: 2006/0195411 (2006-08-01), Knight
patent: 2007/0083726 (2007-04-01), Newton
patent: 2007/0150855 (2007-06-01), Jeong
patent: 2009/0138808 (2009-05-01), Moromisato et al.
patent: WO9940512 (1999-08-01), None
G. Kapel, B. Proll, S. Rausch-Schott, and W. Retschitzegger, TriGSflow—Active Object Oriented Workflow Management System, In Proc. Of the 28th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 727-736, 1995.
B. Grosof and T. Poon, Representing Agent Contracts with Execptions Using XML Rules, Ontologies and Process Descriptions, in Rule Markup Languages for Business Rules on the Semantic Web, Jun. 2002, 22 Pages.
F. Hayes-Roth, Rule-Based Systems, Communications of the ACM, vol. 28, Issue 9, pp. 921-932, 1985.
J. Eisenstein and A. Puerta, Adaption in Automated User-Interface Design, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 74-81, 2000.
Thomas Rizzo, WinFS 101: Introducing the New Windows File System, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/wn-us/dnwinfs/html/winfs03112004.asp?frame=true, Mar. 17, 2004, 5 Pages, Last viewed on Aug. 23, 2004.
Shawn Wildermuth, A Developer's Prespective on WinFS: Part 1, http://msdn.microsoft.com.library/en-us/dnlong/html/winfsdevpersp.asp?frame=true, Mar. 2004, 12 Pages, Last Viewed Aug. 23, 2004.
Yeh, Brian; Exporting Software and the Extraterritorial Reach of US Patent Law: Microsoft Corp. V. AT&T Corp. CRS Report for Congress, May 31, 2007, Order Code RS22670.
Chamberlain, Xquery: An XML Query Language; Aug. 16, 2002; pp. 597-615.
Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,765.
Office Action dated May 30, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,735.
Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,735.
Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,762.
Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,762.
Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,762.
Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,762.
Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/903,762.
Buchi et al., “Compound Types for Java”, Aug. 1998, ACM, pp. 362-373.
Xduce: A Typed XML Processing Language, Last Viewed on Aug. 19, 2004, 1 Page, http://xduce.sourceforge.net/.
Y. Leontiev, M.T. Ozsu, and D. Szafron, on Type Systems for Object-Oriented Database Programming Languages, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 34 Issue 4, pp. 409-449, 2002.
Xquery 1.0: An XML Query Language, W3C, Last Viewed on Aug. 19, 2004, 270 pages, http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/.
The Xtatic Project: Native XML Processing for C#. Last Viewed on Aug. 19, 2004, 2 pages, http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜bcpierce/xtatic/.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US04/24719, dated: Sep. 21, 2007, 3 Pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US04/25060, dated: May 28, 2008, 4 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/178,845, mailed Feb. 4, 2011, Office Action.
Maes Pattie, Agents that reduce work and Information overload. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, ACM, New York, NY, US. vol. 37 No. 7, Jul. 1994, pp. 30-40, XP002193398. ISSN:0001-0782. 12 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/203,741, mailed Mar. 18, 2008, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/203,741, mailed Nov. 6, 2008, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/203,741, mailed May 5, 2009, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/178,845, mailed Dec. 22, 2009, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/178,845, mailed Jul. 8, 2010, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/178,845, mailed Nov. 10, 2010, Office Action.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Rich end-user data views does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Rich end-user data views, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Rich end-user data views will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4259604