Winding – tensioning – or guiding – Reeling device – With spring motor
Patent
1999-01-21
2000-12-05
Walsh, Donald P.
Winding, tensioning, or guiding
Reeling device
With spring motor
2423834, 280806, 297478, B65H 7548, B60R 22415
Patent
active
061555134
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a retractor locking mechanism for vehicle safety restraints and particularly to such a mechanism for a retractor fitted a with pretensioner.
Known retractors for vehicle safety restraints have two sensors. A so-called vehicle sensor detects rapid acceleration or deceleration of the vehicle, indicative of a crash situation, and operates a locking mechanism in response to such a condition to prevent further webbing withdrawal from the retractor. A webbing sensor traditionally uses an inertia disc rotating with the spool to detect rapid withdrawal of webbing, again indicative of a crash situation, and to lock the webbing spool against further rotation in response to such rapid withdrawal.
Recently pretensioning systems have been incorporated to improve safety restraints. These devices take up slack in the webbing to more securely locate the vehicle occupant in his seat in the event of a crash. Rapid acceleration or deceleration of a vehicle typically triggers an explosive device to pull a cable and rapidly rotate the retractor spool in a webbing winding direction. A webbing intake of 200 mm in approximately 10 ms is required for the pretensioner to be effective.
At these rates of acceleration the applicant has observed that the web sensor is prelocked by the operation of the pretensioner.
The web sensor has an earlier phasing geometry than the vehicle sensor so that it tends to cause engagement of the main locking member earlier than the vehicle sensor does.
It is an object of the present invention to take advantage of the earlier phasing geometry of the webbing sensor and to provide a locking mechanism which is actuated via the webbing sensor and which locks the retractor spool permanently against further webbing withdrawal. Such a locking mechanism has the advantage of preventing webbing payout in a multiple crash situation and of being a tangible sign that a pretensioner has fired and preventing re-use of the retractor after an accident.
According to the present invention there is provided a locking mechanism for a webbing retractor for a vehicle safety restraint system, the retractor comprising safety restraint webbing wound on a rotatable spool, and on inertia member mounted for rotation with the spool under normal usage conditions and means coupling the inertia member to the spool so that it rotates with the spool under normal usage conditions, and is decouplable by acceleration or deceleration forces above a predetermined level (e.g. indicative of a pretensioning operation) to decouple the inertia members and the spool and wherein holding means are operable by the inertia member to hold a locking pawl in locking engagement with the spool to lock the spool against rotation.
Preferably the retractor comprises a web sensor having a web sensor inertia element mounted to rotate with the spool and the inertia member under normal usage conditions and resiliently connected to the locking paw in such a way that when the spool is rotated faster that a predetermined speed the inertia element lags the spool and via the resilient means moves the locking pawl into locking engagement with the spool to lock the spool against rotation.
Preferably the coupling means comprise shear pins or deformable elements which nay be formed integrally with the inertia member and which shear or bend respectively under high acceleration or deceleration forces to allow rotation of the inertia member independently of the spool. Advantageously the shear pins are located in indentations or blind holes to prevent the loose parts fouling the retractor mechanism after they have fractured.
According to a particular preferred embodiment the holding means comprises an integrally moulded detent on the second inertia member. The inertia member may be provided with a spring bias adapted to bias the holding means to lock onto the locking means on operation of the mechanism of the invention. This bias could be a coiled torsion spring linking the inertia member to the web senso
REFERENCES:
patent: 3421605 (1969-01-01), Hansen
patent: 4177962 (1979-12-01), Hildebrandt
patent: 4190213 (1980-02-01), Ueda
patent: 4429841 (1984-02-01), Kassai
patent: 4461434 (1984-07-01), Butenop
patent: 5480105 (1996-01-01), Fujimura et al.
patent: 6015164 (2000-01-01), Yano
patent: 6068208 (2000-05-01), Matsuki et al
Breed Automotive Technology Inc.
Seitzman Markell
Walsh Donald P.
Webb Collin A.
LandOfFree
Retractor locking mechanism does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Retractor locking mechanism, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Retractor locking mechanism will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-953653