Restriction indicator

Signals and indicators – Indicators – Fluid flow

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C116S273000, C116SDIG007, C116SDIG002

Reexamination Certificate

active

06976448

ABSTRACT:
The present disclosure relates to a restriction indicator for an air cleaner system of an internal combustion engine. The restriction indicator includes a housing divided into first and second chambers by a diaphragm. A signal member is connected to the diaphragm. The signal member is moveable along an axis between a reset position and a first indicator position, and defines an axial opening within which a first retaining shoulder is located. A guide member is provided for guiding the signal member as the signal member is moved between the reset position and the first axial position. A retaining member is provided for retaining the signal member in the first indicator position. The retaining member extends within the axial opening of the signal member and includes at least two fingers that project radially outward from the axis. The fingers are configured to engage the first retaining shoulder to retain the signal member in the first indicator position. The restriction indicator further includes a reset button for deflecting the fingers radially inward to disengage the fingers from the first retaining shoulder thereby allowing the signal member to be returned to the reset position. The reset button includes a portion that extends within the axial opening of the signal member between the retaining member and the signal member.

REFERENCES:
patent: 1176338 (1916-03-01), Bromberg
patent: 1874913 (1932-08-01), Crowley
patent: 3066527 (1962-12-01), Stein et al.
patent: 3068831 (1962-12-01), Witchell et al.
patent: 3258960 (1966-07-01), Baden et al.
patent: 3283584 (1966-11-01), Coffing
patent: 3335694 (1967-08-01), Dwyer et al.
patent: 3443365 (1969-05-01), Lee et al.
patent: 3465707 (1969-09-01), Kashiwaba
patent: 3556043 (1971-01-01), Vayda
patent: 3639998 (1972-02-01), Mason
patent: 3916817 (1975-11-01), Kemp
patent: 3934543 (1976-01-01), Howard
patent: 3936284 (1976-02-01), Mason
patent: 3939457 (1976-02-01), Nelson
patent: 3963891 (1976-06-01), De Magondeaux
patent: 4014209 (1977-03-01), Emerick
patent: 4020783 (1977-05-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 4029041 (1977-06-01), Genshpring et al.
patent: 4031847 (1977-06-01), Sullivan
patent: 4033733 (1977-07-01), Nelson
patent: 4060050 (1977-11-01), Simonsson
patent: 4116156 (1978-09-01), Draxler
patent: 4153003 (1979-05-01), Willis
patent: 4162660 (1979-07-01), Albertson et al.
patent: 4184376 (1980-01-01), Thomas et al.
patent: 4189707 (1980-02-01), Ermert
patent: 4189724 (1980-02-01), Onuma et al.
patent: 4193292 (1980-03-01), Simonsson
patent: 4215646 (1980-08-01), Williams
patent: 4254731 (1981-03-01), Taylor
patent: 4365582 (1982-12-01), Boyer et al.
patent: 4369728 (1983-01-01), Nelson
patent: 4445456 (1984-05-01), Nelson
patent: 4445457 (1984-05-01), Bargman
patent: 4651670 (1987-03-01), Silverwater
patent: 4688511 (1987-08-01), Gerlach et al.
patent: 4747364 (1988-05-01), Horowitz
patent: 5188728 (1993-02-01), Traonvoez et al.
patent: 5351035 (1994-09-01), Chrisco
patent: 5606311 (1997-02-01), Polidan et al.
patent: 5774056 (1998-06-01), Berry, III et al.
patent: 6026539 (2000-02-01), Mouw et al.
patent: 6161417 (2000-12-01), Nepsund
patent: 6268791 (2001-07-01), Ferris
patent: 6307466 (2001-10-01), Ferris
patent: 6327902 (2001-12-01), Berry, III et al.
patent: 26 17 972 (1976-04-01), None
patent: 25 50 162 (1977-05-01), None
patent: 2 141 993 (1973-01-01), None
patent: 2 298 097 (1975-01-01), None
patent: 2 338 395 (1976-01-01), None
patent: 2 568 484 (1985-07-01), None
patent: WO 97/06363 (1997-02-01), None
patent: WO 99/25974 (1999-05-01), None
U.S. District Court Northern District of Iowa (Waterloo) Civil Docket for Case #: 6:98-cv-02106-MWB 1998.
Affidavit of Timothy J. Vezeau (Jul. 31, 2000).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Statement of Uncontroverted Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Aug. 1, 2000).
Table of Contents and Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment Motion and Regarding Markman Hearing (Aug. 1, 2000).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Statement of Controverted Facts in Response to EPC's Recast Statement of Undisputed Facts (Aug. 25, 2000).
Table of Contents and Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Engineered Products Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Aug. 25, 2000).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Engineered Products Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Aug. 25, 2000).
Plantiff Engineered Products Co.'s Rebuttal to Defendant's Statement of Uncontroverted Facts (Aug. 25, 2000).
Table of Contents and Plaintiff Engineered Products Co.'s Memorandum in Response to Defendant Motion for Summary Judgment (Aug. 25, 2000).
Donaldson's Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (Sep. 8, 2000).
Affidavit of Ken R. Hall in Support of Motion Regarding Supplemental Affidavit of Bridget A. Sullivan, including Exhibits 1-7 (Sep. 14, 2000).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Response to Engineered Products Co.'s Rebuttal to Defendant's Statement of Uncontroverted Facts (Sep. 15, 2000).
Third Affidavit of Bridget A. Sullivan in Support of Plaintiff Engineered Products Co.'s Opposition to Donaldson Company's Motion for Summary Judgment, including Exhibits A and B (Sep. 19, 2000).
Markman Hearing and Summary Judgment Motions, Part I (Sep. 21, 2000).
Markman Hearing and Summary Judgment Motions, Part 2 (Sep. 21, 2000).
Opinion and Order (Mar. 27, 2001).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of its Rule 60(b) Motion or, Alternatively, for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal (May 17, 2001).
Affidavit of Bridget Sullivan in Support of Engineered Products Co.'s Response to Defendant's Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(b) or, Alternatively, for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal, including Exhibits 1-6 (May 31, 2001).
Engineered Products Co.'s Response to Defendant's Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(b) or Alternatively, for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal (Jun. 1, 2001).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of its Rule 60(b) Motion or, Alternatively, for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal (Jun. 8, 2001).
Opinion and Order (Jun. 11, 2001).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Based on New Federal Circuit Case Law Re: Double Patenting (Sep. 21, 2001).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Regarding its Motion for Summary Judgment Based on New Federal Circuit Case Law Re: Double Patenting (Dec. 21, 2001).
Brief of Engineered Products Resisting Donaldson's Motion for Summary Judgment on Double Patenting (Jan. 22, 2002).
Affidavit of Daniel N. Campau, including Exhibits A-C (Jan. 22, 2002).
Response of Engineered Products Co. to Donaldson Co. Inc.'s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Additional Facts that Preclude Summary Judgment (Jan. 22, 2002).
Affidavit of James W. Miller, including Exhibits A-C (Feb. 5, 2002).
Donaldson Company Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment Based on New Federal Circuit Case Law RE: Double Patenting (Feb. 6, 2002).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Reply to Response of Engineered Products Co. to Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Regarding Motion for Summary Judgment Based on New Federal Circuit Case Law RE: Double Patenting (Feb. 6, 2002).
Supplemental Affidavit of Daniel N. Campau (Mar. 22, 2002).
Reply Memorandum of Engineered Products in Support of Motion to Submit Supplemental Affidavit of Daniel N. Campau (Apr. 3, 2002).
Donaldson Company Inc.'s Surreply Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment RE: Double Patenting and in Opposition to Plantiff's Motion to Reassert the '728 Patent (Aug. 9, 2002).
Memorandum Opinion and Order Regarding Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Double Patenting and Plantiff's Motion to Reassert '728 Patent (Sep. 30, 2002).
Affidavit of Edward M. Laine, including Exhibits A-E (Nov. 19, 2003).
Plantiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine to Allow Evidence on Doctrine of Equivalents (Jan. 8, 2004).
Donaldson Company, Inc.'s Joint Objection to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine on Doctrine of Equivalents and

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Restriction indicator does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Restriction indicator, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Restriction indicator will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3522649

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.