Land vehicles – Wheeled – Attachment
Reexamination Certificate
2001-09-10
2003-03-18
Dickson, Paul N. (Department: 3618)
Land vehicles
Wheeled
Attachment
C180S271000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06533317
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
The invention relates to a restraining device comprising an air bag, a controller controlling the ignition time and/or the fill of the air bag, and responsive to sensor signals characterizing the position of a vehicle occupant from at least one sensor element. The sensor signals suppress the release of the air bag if the controller, on the basis of the sensor signals, identifies a critical position of the occupant in a “danger” zone of the air bag.
In know arrangements provision is made so that the controller evaluates the sensor signals characterizing the sitting position of the occupant, particularly whether the occupant is in a previously defined danger zone, determined substantially by the range of swing of an air bag flap normally covering the air bag, and an additional, more extensive range determined essentially by the deploying characteristic of the air bag. In that case, the controller of the known arrangement device assumes that in event of a release of the air bag taking place at this time, the occupant would be seriously endangered, and therefore generates a control signal inhibiting the release of the air bag.
This procedure has the disadvantage that the controller reacts statically to the pre-defined values of the danger zone and therefore not flexibly enough to the actual process of the accident.
It is an object of the invention to provide a restraining device that provides adaptation of the control signal of the controller to suppresses release of the air bag according to actual conditions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention, the controller of a restraining device defines a danger zone dynamically, as a function of parameters supplied to it from one or more sensors.
The arrangement according to the invention has the advantage that there is provided a better adaptation of the release behavior of the air bag to the actual process of the accident. In the case of accidents of minor severity—as an example of a parameter external to the vehicle—provision is advantageously made so that the controller bases its decision whether to generate a control signal inhibiting release of the air bag or not on, a larger danger zone, whereas with a greater severity of accident, this decision is based on a dynamic danger zone substantially smaller than the pre-defined static danger zone; that is, in the case of the restraining device according to the invention, in the case last mentioned, the air bag is also released if the occupant of the vehicle is in an “out-of-position” attitude or even in a “critical out-of-position” attitude.
An advantageous refinement of the invention provides that the weight of the occupant—that is, a parameter internal to the vehicle—is sensed, and a corresponding sensor signal is supplied to the controller of the restraining device according to the invention, and incorporated in the calculation of the dynamic danger zone.
Another advantageous refinement of the invention provides that the speed of the vehicle and/or the acceleration of the vehicle is incorporated in the calculation of the dynamic danger zone. According to further advantageous refinements of the invention, provision may advantageously be made so that the direction of motion and/or the place of impact of the occupant are incorporated in the determination of the dynamic danger zone.
Other details and advantages of the invention will be found in the embodiment about to be described by way of example with reference to the figure.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5330226 (1994-07-01), Gentry et al.
patent: 5446661 (1995-08-01), Gioutsos et al.
patent: 5626359 (1997-05-01), Steffens, Jr. et al.
patent: 5835873 (1998-11-01), Darby et al.
patent: 6018693 (2000-01-01), Blackburn et al.
patent: 6151540 (2000-11-01), Anishetty
patent: 6168198 (2001-01-01), Breed et al.
patent: 6220627 (2001-04-01), Stanley
patent: 6302438 (2001-10-01), Stopper, Jr. et al.
patent: 6341252 (2002-01-01), Foo et al.
patent: 4112579 (1991-10-01), None
patent: 5330226 (1994-06-01), None
patent: 19610833 (1996-09-01), None
patent: 19814678 (1998-10-01), None
patent: 19814691 (1999-03-01), None
Phen et al., “Advanced Air Bag Technology Assessment—Section 5: Occupant Protection Advanced Technology”, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Apr. 1998.
Baker & Botts LLP
Dickson Paul N.
Fleming Faye M.
Volkswagen AG
LandOfFree
Restraining device with dynamic “danger” zone does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Restraining device with dynamic “danger” zone, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Restraining device with dynamic “danger” zone will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3038082