Measuring and testing – Vibration – Resonance – frequency – or amplitude study
Reexamination Certificate
1999-11-19
2001-12-18
Williams, Hezron (Department: 2856)
Measuring and testing
Vibration
Resonance, frequency, or amplitude study
C073S602000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06330827
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to resonant ultrasound spectroscopy, and, more particularly for the characterization of material using nonlinear resonant ultrasound spectroscopy.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Both Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS) and the pulse echo method for sonic testing of materials rely on the linear elastic properties of the medium for sonic interrogation of damage. RUS relies on observing resonant peak mode splitting for damage diagnostics. The pulse-echo method relies on monitoring reflected sound energy from a damaged region or crack, or from changes in the sound wave speed, and/or wave dissipation of waves that pass through the damaged region.
The pulse-echo method tends to be the least sensitive of these methods for damage diagnostics because, if the impedance contrast (impedance is defined as the wave speed times the material density) between the undamaged and damaged region is not strong, which is often the case, there will be no, or little, reflected energy from that region. Wave speed and/or dissipation of waves passing through a damaged region can be difficult to observe and interpret.
Further, pulse-echo requires one to know where the damage is in advance, because the acoustic source must be directly aimed at the region of damage in order for a result to be obtained. RUS and nonlinear RUS (NRUS) require only one source/receiver position, relying on coupling into all or the most important resonant modes of the sample. This means that knowledge of the damage location is less important. In application of RUS, the mode or modes that are affected by the damage will show a split resonance peak.
RUS has been demonstrated to be significantly more sensitive to damage than the pulse echo method, because RUS takes advantage of small signal attenuation during resonance. In short, RUS is a volumetric measurement rather than a point measurement, and is generally easier to interpret. The primary drawback of RUS is that objects with complicated geometry are very difficult to measure. Pulse echo methods can have the advantage in this situation.
It has been demonstrated that the nonlinear response of materials is far more sensitive to damage than the linear response. Therefore, if damage is present, NRUS can “see” the damage in a more sensitive manner than any linear method, and can monitor progression of damage in a manner that no linear acoustical method can. Even very small damage features can be observed, which is not the case of the pulse echo method, and is only sometimes possible with RUS. The primary drawback is that, like RUS, objects with complicated geometry are very difficult to measure. However, the method works very well if the geometry is simple.
Because of their low aspect ratio “compliant features”, i.e., grain contacts, dislocations, cracks, and other thin voids that comprise their microstructure, volumetrically damaged materials, such as rocks or solid materials, metals, and the like, compress more readily that their component solid materials. Further, their elastic moduli vary in response to dynamic wave strain fields passing through them. At strains as low as 10
−8
, here is a softening nonlinearity (decrease in modulus) as strain amplitude is increased. This quality produces a rich variety of nonlinear elastic phenomena seen in dynamic experiments and described in several models of nonlinear acoustics: (1) harmonic frequency generation from single frequency waves resonant and propagating; (2) sum and difference frequency generation when more than one frequency is present; (3) hysteresis and end-point memory in stress-strain behavior; (4) resonance peak shifts and peak asymmetry in bar resonance; and (5) slow dynamic elastic behavior. For instance, a symmetrical resonance curve obtained at low strain levels can be highly asymmetric at high strain levels. At the same time, the peak resonance frequency can be shifted downward and waveforms collected near the resonance peak are distorted due to the creation of harmonics.
These complex characteristics of materials having such compliant features have been widely studied in the laboratory. But none of them has been identified as suitable for providing a damage assessment of the material or to provide criteria for accepting or rejecting a component or structure. In accordance with the present invention, a sensitive measure of damage is provided by the frequency shift of the resonant response at increasing strain levels.
Various objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the purposes of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention includes a method for identifying components with defects using strains applied at acoustical and ultrasound frequencies. The relative resonance frequency shift |&Dgr;ƒ/ƒ
0
| is determined as a function of applied strain for an acceptable component, where ƒ
0
is the frequency of the resonance peak at the lowest amplitude of applied strain and &Dgr;ƒ is the frequency shift of the resonance peak as strain amplitude is increased to determine a reference relationship. Then, the relative resonance frequency shift |&Dgr;ƒ/ƒ
0
| is determined as a function of applied strain for a component under test, where ƒ
0
is the frequency of the resonance peak at the lowest amplitude of applied strain and &Dgr;ƒ is the frequency shift of the resonance peak to determine a quality test relationship. The reference relationship is compared with the quality test relationship to determine the presence of defects in the component under test.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4062227 (1977-12-01), Heyman
patent: 5062296 (1991-11-01), Migliori
patent: 5146289 (1992-09-01), Newman
patent: 5355731 (1994-10-01), Dixon et al.
patent: 5408880 (1995-04-01), Rhodes et al.
patent: 5425272 (1995-06-01), Rhodes et al.
patent: 5612495 (1997-03-01), Shimada et al.
patent: 5631423 (1997-05-01), Rhodes
patent: 5767415 (1998-06-01), Azbel
patent: 5837896 (1998-11-01), Rhodes et al.
patent: 5974881 (1999-11-01), Donskoy et al.
patent: 5992234 (1999-11-01), Rhodes et la.
K.E-A Van Den Abeele et al., “Single Mode Nonlinear Resonance Acoustic Spectroscopy for Damage Detection in Quasi-brittle Materials,” Proceedings of the 2ndInternation Conference on Emerging Technologies in NDT, Athens, May 24-26, 1999.
P.A. Johnson et al., “Manifestation of Nonlinear Elasticity in Rock: Convincing Evidence Over Large Frequency and Strain Intervals From Laboratory Studies,” Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 3, pp. 77-88, 1996.
Paul A. Johnson et al., “Resonance and Elastic Nonlinear Phenomena in Rock,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 101, No. B5, pp. 11, 553-11, 564, May 10, 1996.
Bernard Zinszner et al., “Influence of Change in Physical State on Elastic Nonlinear Response in Rock: Significance of Effective Pressure and Water Saturation,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 102, No. B4, pp. 8105-8120, Apr. 10, 1997.
Guyer Robert A.
Johnson Paul A.
TenCate James A.
Van Den Abeele Koen E. A.
Saint-Surin Jacques
The Regents of the University of California
Williams Hezron
Wilson Ray G.
LandOfFree
Resonant nonlinear ultrasound spectroscopy does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Resonant nonlinear ultrasound spectroscopy, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Resonant nonlinear ultrasound spectroscopy will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2574281