Resilient caps for cross-ties at railway crossings

Railways: surface track – Roadbed – Street crossing

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C238S002000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06250562

ABSTRACT:

At road/rail crossings, it is known to provide a concrete panel or slab. The panel is placed in the space between the railway lines, and serves as the roadway between the railway lines. The panel rests on top of the cross-ties. Sometimes, such panels have failed prematurely.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The concrete panel is not loaded at all (other than by its own weight) when a train passes through the crossing. The loading of the panel occurs due to trucks and other vehicular road traffic passing over the crossing.
When a heavy truck passes over the crossing, the panel is subjected to bending stresses, in that the panel tends to deflect downwards between those points where the panel touches the cross-ties. In a case where the cross-ties are uneven, the panel might bridge over several cross-ties without actually touching. That is to say, the underside of the panel rests on the high-standing cross-ties, but is clear of the low-standing cross-ties.
If the panel is flexible enough, under a heavy road-traffic load, the panel might deflect so far that the undersurface of the panel touches the tops of the low-standing intermediate cross-ties. Once the panel touches the tops of the low-standing cross-ties, the panel is now supported by that cross-tie, and no further downwards deflection of the panel takes place.
The conditions that lead to premature failure occur when the cross-ties are unusually uneven. Given that all the cross-ties are mounted at exactly the same heights at their rail-attachment points, it might be considered surprising that the top surfaces of the cross-ties are not all at exactly the same heights, i.e that the top surfaces of the ties do not all lie in exactly the same flat, horizontal plane. However, there are a number of reasons for the unevenness. First, concrete cross-ties are moulded, and usually come from several different moulds, and the mould-maker would not have paid particular attention to getting all the moulds exactly equal. Also, the (moulded) concrete panel itself is large, and heavy, and its undersurface might not be completely flat. Also, some ties have writing embossed on the top surfaces. Concrete panels and concrete ties have metal reinforcing bars 1st into the concrete, and the bars can give rise to a slight distortion of the concrete components.
Naturally, the designer of the system takes account of the maximum unevenness of the tops of the cross-ties, and sees to it that the amount of stress the panel might undergo, in bending, will not cause the panel to fail. However, the panels still do seem to fail, and the notion has arisen that there must be some unknown factor affecting failure of the panels. Concrete panels are disfavoured by many railroad companies for this reason.
This is a pity, because concrete panels have the benefit that they can be installed quickly. One of the factors when working at road-rail crossings is that the crossing has to be closed—certainly to road traffic if not to rail traffic—for the period while the work is being done. One-piece panels offer the possibility that the panel can be pre-manufactured and brought to the site, and then the panel is simply hoisted up and lowered into position between the rails. The commercially-practical alternative to the one-piece concrete panel is to apply asphalt between the rails; however, where the one-piece panel takes just minutes to install, a corresponding asphalt installation takes hours. If only the concrete panels could find favour, on-site work could be carried out more quickly, and with pre-manufactured components, which would keep the on-site labour costs (and unpredictabilities) to a minimum.
The invention is aimed at providing a system for capping the cross-ties, in order to alleviate the problems of premature failure of the concrete panels.
GENERAL FEATURES OF THE INVENTION
The invention lies in providing ribbed caps of rubber, or other elastomeric material, between the panel and the cross-ties. The ribbed caps act to safeguard the panel from the stresses that would arise if the panel were in direct contact with the cross-ties.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4267969 (1981-05-01), Hales et al.
patent: 5181657 (1993-01-01), Davis
patent: 5513797 (1996-05-01), Lesley

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Resilient caps for cross-ties at railway crossings does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Resilient caps for cross-ties at railway crossings, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Resilient caps for cross-ties at railway crossings will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2493615

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.