Rendering of photorealistic computer graphics images

Image analysis – Pattern recognition – Feature extraction

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C345S419000, C345S606000, C345S611000, C382S258000, C382S260000, C382S266000, C382S300000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06636633

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to the field of computer imaging. More specifically, techniques and apparatus aimed at fast rendering of photo realistic computer graphic images.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The ability to synthesize photorealistic images in real-time has been the goal of practitioners in the field of computer graphics for many years. A variety of different techniques are known for generating images of three-dimensional objects on a computer graphics display. One class of techniques divide a two-dimensional array of data values into shaded polygons, which are then projected onto the display screen. To accelerate the image generation process, many polygon-based techniques utilize a special graphics processor to alleviate the computational burden on the computer's central processing unit (CPU).
Another class of computer imaging techniques is known as ray tracing. Ray tracing is a pixel-based technique that is capable of producing highly realistic images in computer graphic systems. A chief drawback of ray tracing techniques, however, is the extensive computations required to generate each pixel of the display screen. These intensive computations often impose a severe burden on the computer processing hardware. The slow processing times associated with ray tracing techniques have limited their application in computer graphics systems. For example, an article entitled, “Outlook on Computer Graphics”, by D. P. Greenburg,
IEEE Computer,
31(1): 36—36 (January 1998), suggests that it will not be until the year 2025 before computer systems have the display and computational capability to produce realistic, real-time images using pixel-based techniques.
An example of a computer system that utilizes ray tracing is described in “Antialiased Ray tracing by Adaptive Progressive Refinement,” by J. Painter and K. Sloan,
Computer Graphics
(SIGGRAPH '89 Proceedings), Vol. 23, pages 281-288 (July 1989). Further background in this area may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,872,902, which teaches a hardware implementation of a computationally intensive anti-aliasing technique for generating three-dimensional images on a workstation graphics processor. U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,623 discloses a volume rendering apparatus for visualizing an image on a display screen of an imaging device such as a computer tomagraphy scanner for a magnetic resonance imaging machine. A method and system for generating an anti-aliasing image of a three-dimensional surface is also described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,542,032, which teaches performing certain floating-point arithmetic and comparison operations on pixel data.
Despite the rapidly increasing power of computers, global illumination is far from being a real-time process. Accurate radiance evaluations often require hours of computation for complex scenes. To balance rendering speed and visual realism, global illumination algorithms have often adopted a progressive refinement approach, like that described in the Painter and Sloan article mentioned above. Progressive refinement methods typically sample densely where sharp features are identified. In areas of the image plane where there is an absence of sharp features—i.e., the image data changes slowly—progressive refinement techniques sample very sparsely, and then interpolate.
The problem with these past techniques is that image artifacts are often lost when the sampling criteria is minimized. For instance, if it is desired to keep the sampling rate below 10%, many prior art progressive refinement approaches prove to be inadequate. In other words, although such techniques provide a reasonable approach to the problem, they require relatively high sampling rates to provide fast rendering of photorealistic computer graphics images. At low sampling rates (e.g., less than 10%) previous techniques such as adaptive stochastic sampling suffer from artifacts including heavily jagged edges, missing object parts, and missing high-frequency details.
Thus, there exists a need for methods and apparatus that can reconstruct a high-quality image after evaluating only a small percentage of the pixels.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5031117 (1991-07-01), Minor et al.
patent: 5283859 (1994-02-01), Quarendon et al.
patent: 5542032 (1996-07-01), Pritt
patent: 5583975 (1996-12-01), Naka et al.
patent: 5831623 (1998-11-01), Negishi et al.
patent: 5872902 (1999-02-01), Kuchkuda et al.
patent: 5987172 (1999-11-01), Michael
patent: 6040911 (2000-03-01), Nozaki et al.
patent: 6101277 (2000-08-01), Go
patent: 6148115 (2000-11-01), Mackinnon et al.
patent: 6167154 (2000-12-01), Renaud et al.
patent: 6181802 (2001-01-01), Todd
patent: 6370279 (2002-04-01), Paik
C. Kolb. Rayshade User's Guide and Reference Manual. Rayshade home page at graphics.stanford.edu, Jan. 1992.
J. Arvo. The Irradiance Jacobian for Partially Occluded Polyhedral Sources. In A. Glassner, editor,Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pp. 75-84, Jul. 1994.
L.D. Bergman, H. Fuchs, E. Grant, and S. Spach. Image Rendering By Adaptive Refinement. In D.C. Evans and R.J. Athay, editors,Computer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '86 Proceedings), vol. 20, pp. 29-37, Aug. 1986.
J. Bloomenthal, Edge Inference with Applications to Antialiasing. InComputer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '83 Proceedings), vol. 17, pp. 157-162, Jul. 1983.
M.R. Bolin and G.W. Meyer, A Frequency Based Ray Tracer, In R. Cook, editor,Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pp. 409-418, Aug. 1995.
A.T. Campbell III and D.S. Fussell. Adaptive Mesh Generation for Global Diffuse Illumination. InComputer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '90 Proceedings), vol. 24, pp. 155-164, Aug. 1990.
S.E. Chen, H.E. Rushmeier, G. Miller, and D. Turner. A Progressive Multi-Pass Method for Global Illumination. In T.W. Sederberg, editor.Computer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '91 Proceedings), vol. 25, pp. 165-174, Jul. 1991.
N. Chin and S. Feiner. Near Real-Time Shadow Generation Using BSP Trees. In J. Lane, editor,Computer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '89 Proceedings), vol. 23, pp. 99-106, Jul. 1989.
M.F. Cohen, S.E. Chen, J.R. Wallace, and D.P. Greenberg. A Progressive Refinement Approach to Fast Radiosity Image Generation. In J. Dill, editor,Computer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '88 Proceedings), vol. 22, pp. 75-84, Aug. 1988.
R.L. Cook, T. Porter, and L. Carpenter, Distributed Ray Tracing. InComputer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '84 Proceedings). vol. 18, pp. 137-145, Jul. 1984.
F. Crow. Shadow Algorithms for Computer Graphics. InComputer Graphics(SIGGRAPH 77 Proceedings), vol. 11, pp. 242-248, Jul. 1977.
G. Dretakkis and E. Fiume. A Fast Shadow Algorithm for Area Light Sources Using Backprojection. In A. Glassner, editor,Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pp. 223-230, Jul. 1994.
A. Fujimoto, T. Tanaka, and K. Iwata. ARTS: Accelerated Ray Tracing System.IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 6(4):16-26, Jul. 1986.
P Heckbert. Discontinuity Meshing For Radiosity,Third Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pp. 203-226, May 1992.
A. Jain.Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Prentice Ha . . . , 1989.
J. Kajiya. The Rendering Equation. InComputer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '86 Proceedings), vol. 20, pp. 143-150, Aug. 1986.
M. Kunt, A. Ikonomopous, and M. Kocher, Second-Generation Image Coding Techniques.Proc. of IEEE, 73(4):549-574, 1985.
M.E. Lee, R.A. Redner, and S.P. Uselton. Statistically Optimized Sampling for Distributed Ray Tracing. In B.A. Barsky, editorComputer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '85 Proceedings), vol. 19, pp. 61-67, Jul. 1985.
D. Lischinski, F. Tampieri, and D.P. Greenburg. Combining Hierarchical Radiosity and Discontinuity Meshing. InComputer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pp. 199-208, 1993.
S. Mallat and S. Zhong. Characterization of Signals from Multiscale Edges.IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(7):710-732, 1992.
D.P. Mitchell. Generating Antialiased Images at Low Sampling Densities. In M.C. Stone, editor,Computer Graphics(SIGGRAPH '87 Proceedings), vol. 21, pp. 65-72, Jul. 1987.
F. Pighin, D. Lischinski, and D. Salesln. P

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Rendering of photorealistic computer graphics images does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Rendering of photorealistic computer graphics images, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Rendering of photorealistic computer graphics images will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3114762

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.