Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-01
2003-12-23
Robinson, Greta (Department: 2177)
Data processing: database and file management or data structures
Database design
Data structure types
C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06668251
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to the field of knowledge management and more particularly to a method for refining a search of a database.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE/PERMISSION
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. The following notice applies to the software and data as described below and in the drawings hereto: Copyright© 1999, Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The new field of “knowledge management” (KM) is receiving increasing recognition as the gains to be realized from the systematic effort to store and export vast knowledge resources held by employees of an organization are being recognized. The sharing of knowledge broadly within an organization offers numerous potential benefits to an organization through the awareness and reuse of existing knowledge, and the avoidance of duplicate efforts.
In order to maximize the exploitation of knowledge resources within an organization, a knowledge management system may be presented with two primary challenges, namely (1) the identification of knowledge resources within the organization and (2) the distribution and accessing of information regarding such knowledge resources within the organization.
The identification, capture, organization and storage of knowledge resources is a particularly taxing problem. Prior art knowledge management systems have typically implemented knowledge repositories that require users manually to input information frequently into pre-defined fields, and in this way manually and in a prompted manner to reveal their personal knowledge base. However, this approach suffers from a number of drawbacks in that the manual entering of such information is time consuming and often incomplete, and therefore places a burden on users who then experience the inconvenience and cost of a corporate knowledge management initiative long before any direct benefit is experienced. Furthermore, users may not be motivated to describe their own knowledge and to contribute documents on an ongoing basis that would subsequently be re-used by others without their awareness or consent. The manual input of such information places a burden on users who then experience the inconvenience and cost of a corporate knowledge management initiative long before any direct benefit is experienced.
It has been the experience of many corporations that knowledge management systems, after some initial success, may fail because either compliance (i.e., the thoroughness and continuity with which each user contributes knowledge) or participation (i.e., the percentage of users actively contributing to the knowledge management system) falls to inadequate levels. Without high compliance and participation, it becomes a practical impossibility to maintain a sufficiently current and complete inventory of the knowledge of all users. Under these circumstances, the knowledge management effort may never offer an attractive relationship of benefits to costs for the organization as a whole, reach a critical mass, and the original benefit of knowledge management falls apart or is marginalized to a small group.
In order to address the problems associated with the manual input of knowledge information, more sophisticated prior art knowledge management initiatives may presume the existence of a centralized staff to work with users to capture knowledge bases. This may however increase the ongoing cost of knowledge management and requires a larger up-front investment before any visible payoff, thus deterring the initial funding of many an otherwise promising knowledge management initiatives. Even if an initial decision is made to proceed with such a sophisticated knowledge management initiative, the cash expenses associated with a large centralized knowledge capture staff may be liable to come under attack, given the difficulty of quantifying knowledge management benefits in dollar terms.
As alluded to above, even once a satisfactory knowledge management information base has been established, the practical utilization thereof to achieve maximum potential benefit may be challenging. Specifically, ensuring that the captured information is readily organized, available, and accessible as appropriate throughout the organization may be problematic.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect of the invention, a method for refining a search is described. A keyword is received, and a database comprising terms, where each term comprises one or more members, is accessed. Associated terms in the database are found, where associated terms comprise the keyword. A set of discriminator members is created, where each discriminator member comprises a member of one or more of the associated terms and a corresponding importance metric. The set of discriminator members are created by extracting all members from the terms in the database and creating a set of members unique from each other. An importance value is determined for each unique member, and then the discriminator members are returned.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4914586 (1990-04-01), Swinehart et al.
patent: 4970681 (1990-11-01), Bennett
patent: 5051891 (1991-09-01), Macphail
patent: 5247575 (1993-09-01), Sprague et al.
patent: 5247661 (1993-09-01), Hager et al.
patent: 5251131 (1993-10-01), Masand et al.
patent: 5251159 (1993-10-01), Rowson
patent: 5263160 (1993-11-01), Porter et al.
patent: 5276869 (1994-01-01), Forrest et al.
patent: 5297057 (1994-03-01), Kramer
patent: 5331579 (1994-07-01), Maguire
patent: 5333237 (1994-07-01), Stefanopoulos et al.
patent: 5428740 (1995-06-01), Wood
patent: 5438526 (1995-08-01), Itoh
patent: 5473732 (1995-12-01), Chang
patent: 5481741 (1996-01-01), McKaskle
patent: 5488725 (1996-01-01), Turtle
patent: 5493729 (1996-02-01), Nigawara et al.
patent: 5513126 (1996-04-01), Harkins et al.
patent: 5530852 (1996-06-01), Meske, Jr. et al.
patent: 5541836 (1996-07-01), Church et al.
patent: 5544067 (1996-08-01), Rostoker
patent: 5555426 (1996-09-01), Johnson
patent: 5586218 (1996-12-01), Allen
patent: 5608900 (1997-03-01), Docker et al.
patent: 5628011 (1997-05-01), Ahamed et al.
patent: 5659731 (1997-08-01), Gustafson
patent: 5659732 (1997-08-01), Kirsch
patent: 5692107 (1997-11-01), Simoudis et al.
patent: 5704017 (1997-12-01), Heckerman et al.
patent: 5717914 (1998-02-01), Husick et al.
patent: 5717923 (1998-02-01), Dedrick
patent: 5720001 (1998-02-01), Nguyen
patent: 5724567 (1998-03-01), Rose
patent: 5727129 (1998-03-01), Barrett et al.
patent: 5754938 (1998-05-01), Herz
patent: 5778364 (1998-07-01), Nelson
patent: 5781904 (1998-07-01), Oren et al.
patent: 5794210 (1998-08-01), Goldhaber
patent: 5802518 (1998-09-01), Karaev
patent: 5812434 (1998-09-01), Nagase
patent: 5835087 (1998-11-01), Herz
patent: 5855008 (1998-12-01), Goldhaber
patent: 5867799 (1999-02-01), Lang
patent: 5892909 (1999-04-01), Grasso et al.
patent: 5913212 (1999-06-01), Sutcliffe
patent: 5931907 (1999-08-01), Davies
patent: 5933822 (1999-08-01), Braden-Harder et al.
patent: 5940821 (1999-08-01), Wical
patent: 5950200 (1999-09-01), Sudai
patent: 5963940 (1999-10-01), Liddy et al.
patent: 5974412 (1999-10-01), Hazlehurst
patent: 5995597 (1999-11-01), Woltz
patent: 5999932 (1999-12-01), Paul
patent: 5999975 (1999-12-01), Kittaka
patent: 6006200 (1999-12-01), Boies
patent: 6006221 (1999-12-01), Liddy
patent: 6006225 (1999-12-01), Bowman et al.
patent: 6014644 (2000-01-01), Erickson
patent: 6021439 (2000-02-01), Turek
patent: 6026374 (2000-02-01), Chess
patent: 6038560 (2000-03-01), Wical
patent: 6052122 (2000-04-01), Sutcliffe
patent: 6078914 (2000-06-01), Redfern
patent: 6128613 (2000-10-01), Wong et al.
patent: 6169986 (2001-01-01), Bowman et al.
patent: 6377949 (2002-04-01), Gilmour
patent: 6421669 (2002-07-01), Gilmour et al.
patent: 6510406 (2003-01-01)
Blakely , Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman LLP
Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc.
LandOfFree
Rendering discriminator members from an initial set of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Rendering discriminator members from an initial set of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Rendering discriminator members from an initial set of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3099556