Remotely programmable matrices with memories

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving nucleic acid

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C435S006120, C435S007100, C435S288100, C435S288300, C435S288400, C435S288700, C436S501000, C536S024300

Reexamination Certificate

active

06372428

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the application of data storage technology to molecular tracking and identification and to biological and biochemical assays.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There has been a convergence of progress in chemistry and biology. Among the important advances resulting from this convergence is the development of methods for generating molecular diversity and for detecting and quantifying biological or chemical material. This advance has been facilitated by fundamental developments in chemistry, including the development of highly sensitive analytical methods, solid state chemical synthesis, and sensitive and specific biological assay systems.
Analyses of biological interactions and chemical reactions, however, require the use of labels or tags to track and identify the results of such analyses. Typically biological reactions, such as binding, catalytic, hybridization and signaling reactions, are monitored by labels, such as radioactive, fluorescent, photoabsorptive, luminescent and other such labels, or by direct or indirect enzyme labels. Chemical reactions are also monitored by direct or indirect means, such as by linking the reactions to a second reaction in which a colored, fluorescent, chemiluminescent or other such product results. These analytical methods, however, are often time consuming, tedious and, when practiced in vivo, invasive. In addition, each reaction is typically measured individually, in a separate assay. There is, thus, a need to develop alternative and convenient methods for tracking and identifying analytes in biological interactions and the reactants and products of chemical reactions.
Hybridization Reactions
For example, it is often desirable to detect or quantify very small concentrations of nucleic acids in biological samples. Typically, to perform such measurements, the nucleic acid in the sample [i.e., the target nucleic acid] is hybridized to a detection oligonucleotide. In order to obtain a detectable signal proportional to the concentration of the target nucleic acid, either the target nucleic acid in the sample or the detection oligonucleotide is associated with a signal generating reporter element, such as a radioactive atom, a chromogenic or fluorogenic molecule, or an enzyme [such as alkaline phosphatase] that catalyzes a reaction that produces a detectable product. Numerous methods are available for detecting and quantifying the signal.
Following hybridization of a detection oligonucleotide with a target, the resulting signal-generating hybrid molecules must be separated from unreacted target and detection oligonucleotides. In order to do so, many of the commonly used assays immobilize the target nucleic acids or detection oligonucleotides on solid supports. Presently available solid supports to which oligonucleotides are linked include nitrocellulose or nylon membranes, activated agarose supports, diazotized cellulose supports and non-porous polystyrene latex solid microspheres. Linkage to a solid support permits fractionation and subsequent identification of the hybridized nucleic acids, since the target nucleic acid may be directly captured by oligonucleotides immobilized on solid supports. More frequently, so-called “sandwich” hybridization systems are used. These systems employ a capture oligonucleotide covalently or otherwise attached to a solid support for capturing detection oligonucleotide-target nucleic acid adducts formed in solution [see, eg., EP 276,302 and Gingeras et al. (1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:1173]. Solid supports with linked oligonucleotides are also used in methods of affinity purification. Following hybridization or affinity purification, however, if identification of the linked molecule or biological material is required, the resulting complexes or hybrids or compounds must be subjected to analyses, such as sequencing.
Immunoassays
Immunoassays also detect or quantify very small concentrations of analytes in biological samples. Many immunoassays utilize solid supports in which antigen or antibody is covalently, non-covalently, or otherwise, such as via a linker, attached to a solid support matrix. The support-bound antigen or antibody is then used as an analyte in the assay. As with nucleic acid analysis, the resulting antibody-antigen complexes or other complexes, depending upon the format used, rely on radiolabels or enzyme labels to detect such complexes.
The use of antibodies to detect and/or quantitate reagents [“antigens”] in blood or other body fluids has been widely practiced for many years. Two methods have been most broadly adopted. The first such procedure is the competitive binding assay, in which conditions of limiting antibody are established such that only a fraction [usually 30-50%] of a labeled [e.g., radioisotope, fluorophore or enzyme] antigen can bind to the amount of antibody in the assay medium. Under those conditions, the addition of unlabeled antigen [e.g., in a serum sample to be tested] then competes with the labeled antigen for the limiting antibody binding sites and reduces the amount of labeled antigen that can bind. The degree to which the labeled antigen is able to bind is inversely proportional to the amount of unlabeled antigen present. By separating the antibody-bound from the unbound labeled antigen and then determining the amount of labeled reagent present, the amount of unlabeled antigen in the sample [e.g., serum] can be determined.
As an alternative to the competitive binding assay, in the labeled antibody, or “immunometric” assay [also known as “sandwich” assay], an antigen present in the assay fluid is specifically bound to a solid substrate and the amount of antigen bound is then detected by a labeled antibody [see, e.g., Miles et al. (1968)
Nature
29:186-189; U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,867,517; 4,376,110]. Using monoclonal antibodies two-site immunometric assays are available [see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,376,110]. The “sandwich” assay has been broadly adopted in clinical medicine. With increasing interest in “panels” of diagnostic tests, in which a number of different antigens in a fluid are measured, the need to carry out each immunoassay separately becomes a serious limitation of current quantitative assay technology.
Some semi-quantitative detection systems have been developed [see, e.g., Buechler et al. (1992)
Clin. Chem.
38:1678-1684; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,089,391] for use with immunoassays, but no good technologies yet exist to carefully quantitate a large number of analytes simultaneously [see, eg., Ekins et al. (1990)
J. Clin. Immunoassay
13:169-181] or to rapidly and conveniently track, identify and quantitate detected analytes.
Combinatorial Libraries
Drug discovery relies on the ability to identify compounds that interact with a selected target, such as cells, an antibody, receptor, enzyme, transcription factor or the like. Traditional drug discovery involves screening natural products form various sources, or random screening of archived synthetic material. The current trend, however, is to identify such molecules by rational design and/or by screening combinatorial libraries of molecules.
Combinatorial chemistry is a powerful tool in drug discovery and materials science. Methods and strategies for generating diverse libraries, primarily peptide- and nucleotide-based oligomer libraries, have been developed using molecular biology methods and/or simultaneous chemical synthesis methodologies [see, e.g., Dower et al. (1991)
Annu. Rep. Med. Chem.
26:271-280; Fodor et al. (1991)
Science
251:767-773; Jung et al. (1992)
Angew. Chem. Ind. Ed. Engl.
31:367-383; Zuckerman et al. (1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:4505-4509; Scott et al. (1990)
Science
249:386-390; Devlin et al. (1990)
Science
249:404-406; Cwirla et al. (1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:6378-6382; and Gallop et al. (1994)
J. Medicinal Chemistry
37:1233-1251]. The resulting combinatorial libraries

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Remotely programmable matrices with memories does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Remotely programmable matrices with memories, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Remotely programmable matrices with memories will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2826443

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.