Remote job application method and apparatus

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Operations research or analysis

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S001100, C705S014270, C379S088060, C379S093240, C379S212010, C379S218020, C379S219000, C379S229000, C235S056000, C235S386000, C434S336000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06311164

ABSTRACT:

The present invention relates to a job application method and apparatus and in particular to a system which facilitates receiving and processing job application information from remote applicants using a telecommunications system.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A number of institutions expend considerable time and other resources in an effort to find, evaluate and hire employees. These efforts commonly include written employment application forms, personal interviews or a combination thereof. Each of these techniques involves committing company time and other resources and are associated with certain disadvantages.
The preparation of a written job application form requires an amount of company time particularly when it is desired to customize the solicitation of information to various different jobs. Filing out such a form also requires a time investment by an applicant, often greater than the time investment needed for e.g., orally answering questions, and thus could result in discouraging a number of desirable and qualified applicants. In addition to the time required to prepare the form, processing the written form requires time such as time for processing requests for application forms from potential applicants, selecting the proper form for a given job, mailing or otherwise distributing the form to applicants, receiving completed forms and, typically, transferring the data from the written form to another format such as data entry into a computer and/or reviewing the information presented in the written application form. Thus, the written application form procedure is not a “real time” procedure in the sense that the company does not receive the information from the applicant simultaneously with it being provided by the applicant (i.e. there is a delay involved in the applicant filling out the form and the company processing the data in the form). Processes which are not real time, in addition to typically requiring company time for such procedures as data entry, also inherently fail to provide an indication of how the applicant reacts under a time stress situation and provide relatively unreliable data regarding the applicant's responsiveness (e.g. for employment situations in which promptness of response is a factor in evaluating an applicant or awarding a job).
Personal interviews of job applicants can provide some degree of real time involvement, but have a number of disadvantages. Personal interviews require a substantial investment of time by company personnel conducting the interview. There is a potential, in personal interviews, for the interviewer to solicit information in an undesirable fashion. For example, the company personal conducting personal interviews may ask improper questions (e.g. questions which are not relevant to the particular job involved or which may violate legal or internal company standards, such as questions improperly relating to applicant's race, marital status and the like. Additionally, company personnel conducting personal interviews may exhibit a certain degree of inconsistency (particularly when different company personnel conduct interviews for the same job) e.g. by asking different questions of different applicants. Although many of these disadvantages can be reduced by establishing stringent training and supervision standards for interviewers, there is a cost associated with establishing such training and supervision standards. The cost of training and supervising interviewers is particularly acute when it is desired to provide different interview processes with respect to different jobs. Although personal interviews involve a degree of real time involvement, this is achieved by, typically, requiring the applicant to conform his or her schedule to that of the interviewer, and often by requiring the applicant to physically travel to a central interview location, both of which may discourage otherwise desirable and qualified applicants. Typically after a personal interview, it is necessary to evaluate the interview data which often requires the interviewer to provide written or other summaries of the interview, potentially introducing the possibility of interviewers (intentionally or unintentionally) misrepresenting the information provided by the applicant and requiring additional expenditure of time by company personnel.
Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide a job application procedure and apparatus which avoids discouraging potentially qualified applicants, particularly those that may be remotely located, reduces time and other company resource expenditures, even when it is desired to tailor the job application procedure to different jobs, provides for consistency and compliance with legal and company policies and provides a substantial degree of real time involvement by the applicant during the application procedure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides for a job application procedure and apparatus in which a central location, provided with a computer, receives telecommunications initiated by remotely-located applicants, typically in response to advertisements indicating that applicants may call a specified telephone number to apply for one or more jobs. The central computer obtains information regarding the identity of the applicant (e.g. name, telephone number, address, etc.) which is stored by the computer at the central location. The computer asks questions or otherwise provides prompts to the applicant, such as, in one embodiment, playing audio prompts over a telephone connection. The applicant responds to at least some such prompts such as by providing dual tone multi-frequency (DTMF or “touch tone”) responses via a telephone keypad or other user input device and/or by providing a audio or voice response e.g. using a telephone handset microphone or other microphone. Some, or preferably all, responses of the job applicant are stored in the computer in a manner associated with the identity of the applicant.
In one embodiment, calls are handled using a script file which contains both communication-type elements (e.g. elements specifying that a message should be played or data received) and logic-type elements (such as a “go to”, branch or other flow specifier) providing a system in which the logic by which a call is processed is stored in a script file (rather than, e.g., in the engine or program itself) allowing new scripts to be created, modified or deleted without having to interrupt the computer and stop taking calls and without requiring re-compilation. Preferably the system is configured to answer incoming phone calls and perform different services for each call wherein even when there is a problem with a call on one channel, processing of a different call of another channel can continue without interruption.
By providing a system permitting remote job applicants to complete a job application procedure in real time from a remote location, the system avoids discouraging applicants, reduces time and other resources used in obtaining and processing job applications, even when the job application processes are tailored to specific jobs, provides consistency and compliance with legal and company policies and provides real time involvement of applicants.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5758324 (1998-05-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 5797133 (1999-08-01), Jones et al.
patent: 5870464 (1999-02-01), Brewster et al.
patent: 5870721 (1994-11-01), Norris
patent: WO 9506294 A (1995-03-01), None
patent: WO 1988-3222207 (1998-05-01), None
patent: W)1998-467143 (1998-08-01), None
USPTO, http://www.uspto.gov/go/jars/index.html, pp. 1-14, Feb. 1997.*
USAPPLY, http://www.usapply.com/office.html, p. 1, 1996.*
USAPPLY, http:/www.usapply.com/application.html, p. 1, 1996*
USAPPLY, http:/www.usapply.com/usapply/index.html, pp. 1-14, 1996.*
USAPPLY, http://www.usapply.com/carrigans1.html, pp. 1-2, 1996.*
USAPPLY, http://www.usapply.com/street/talk.html, pp. 1-3, 1996.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Remote job application method and apparatus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Remote job application method and apparatus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Remote job application method and apparatus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2559820

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.