X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices – Specific application – Absorption
Reexamination Certificate
2002-04-03
2004-04-13
Bruce, David V. (Department: 2882)
X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices
Specific application
Absorption
C378S062000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06721391
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method and system for screening items of baggage or packages which may be used, for example, in airports.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Particularly at airports, it is often necessary or desirable to screen passenger baggage for potential threats or contraband items. In light of recent terrorist activities, it is becoming more important to accurately screen baggage. However, with increasing air traffic, it is also becoming more necessary to expedite the screening procedure to avoid long delays. Conventional systems for passenger baggage screening at airports use separate departure screening, for explosives, weapons, etc., and arrival screening for contraband items such as currency or drugs on international flights. Therefore, conventional systems require at least two baggage screening systems—one at a passenger's point of origin, a second at the passenger's destination, and possibly additional systems at any intermediary stops between the passenger's point of origin and his/her destination.
Such baggage inspection systems include X-ray imaging systems, which may employ transmitted and/or scattered X-ray radiation, vapor detection systems, magnetic resonance imaging systems, and other types of inspection systems. The X-ray imaging systems incorporate an X-ray single or dual energy source and a scanning system to scan the object to be inspected with and X-ray beam produced by the source. Some systems use a single-view source and detector arrangement, while others utilize a dual-view or multi-view arrangement. The single-view or dual-view systems usually scan baggage as it moves on a conveyor, using a fan beam or scanning pencil beam of X-rays to provide projection images. The multi-view, CT-type systems generally scan stationary baggage and process data corresponding to absorption of X-rays to reconstruct a cross-sectional view of the contents of the baggage. Conventional systems include a processing device which may optionally digitally manipulate the image generated by the detector arrangement, and a display system which presents the image for inspection by an operator, who then decides whether contraband is located in the baggage based on the shape and location of the imaged items. Generally, in conventional systems, analysis of the image by the operator is done at the same physical location as where the inspection system is located.
UN/EDIFACT (United Nations Rules for Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport) is a set of internationally agreed to standards, directories and guidelines for the electronic exchange of structured data and, in particular, electronic exchanges related to trade in goods and services between independent computerized information systems. The UN/EDIFACT system is the standard for communications in the air transport industry, and is the language by which airlines and airports communicate their reservations, scheduling, and passenger and baggage information. A system known as Advance Passenger Information (API) is a system that utilizes UN/EDIFACT data to transmit and process passenger manifests. Passengers whose data matches a “threat profile” may be separated for second-tier customs screening at destination airports. In the API system, passenger identification may be sent to customs authorities at a destination airport while aircraft is in flight. The passenger identification data can be compared to computer databases containing profiles before the passengers arrive. Although this system expedites the customs procedure by second-tier screening only passengers who match the high risk profile model, the system relies on profiling individuals, and therefore suffers from several drawbacks. For example, much of security profiling is based on the racial or ethnic origin of the passenger, leading to claims of racial discrimination and unlawful search and seizure. Another problem with the system is that it does not screen all passengers, but only those that match the high risk profile model, resulting in an at least partially ineffective system which may miss some baggage that includes illegal contraband.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one embodiment, a computer readable medium may be encoded with a plurality of instructions for execution on at least one processor, the plurality of instructions performing a method of remote screening of items of baggage. The method may comprises steps of storing information about an item under inspection, linking a unique item identifier with the information to uniquely associate the information with the item under inspection and retrieving the information about the item under inspection in response to a request. The method may further include analyzing the information to determine a screening result for the item under inspection, and storing the screening result with the information about the item.
In one example, the information about the item under inspection may includes an image file that includes data corresponding to an X-ray image of the item under inspection. In another example, the step of analyzing the information may include analyzing the image file to identify a region of interest in the X-ray image of the item under inspection.
According to another example, the method may further comprise a step of processing a portion of the image file corresponding to the region if interest in the X-ray image to determine information regarding the region of interest. The method may also include a step of displaying the screening result on an operator interface. In yet another example, the step of analyzing the information may include analyzing the information according to a selected detection algorithm.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4020346 (1977-04-01), Dennis
patent: 4064440 (1977-12-01), Roder
patent: 4217641 (1980-08-01), Naparstek
patent: 4247774 (1981-01-01), Brooks
patent: 4539648 (1985-09-01), Schatzki
patent: 4580219 (1986-04-01), Pele et al.
patent: 4590558 (1986-05-01), Glover et al.
patent: 4709333 (1987-11-01), Crawford
patent: 4759047 (1988-07-01), Donges et al.
patent: 4788704 (1988-11-01), Donges et al.
patent: 4941162 (1990-07-01), Vartsky et al.
patent: 4957250 (1990-09-01), Hararat-Tehrani
patent: 5070519 (1991-12-01), Stein et al.
patent: 5109691 (1992-05-01), Corrigan et al.
patent: 5125015 (1992-06-01), Shimoni et al.
patent: 5162652 (1992-11-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 5182764 (1993-01-01), Peschmann et al.
patent: 5243664 (1993-09-01), Tuy
patent: 5299116 (1994-03-01), Owens et al.
patent: 5319547 (1994-06-01), Krug et al.
patent: 5323004 (1994-06-01), Ettinger et al.
patent: 5367552 (1994-11-01), Peschmann
patent: 5490218 (1996-02-01), Krug et al.
patent: 5600303 (1997-02-01), Husseiny et al.
patent: 5600700 (1997-02-01), Krug et al.
patent: 5642393 (1997-06-01), Krug et al.
patent: 5805660 (1998-09-01), Perion et al.
patent: 5838758 (1998-11-01), Krug et al.
patent: 5909478 (1999-06-01), Polichar et al.
patent: 5933471 (1999-08-01), Kalvin
patent: 5974111 (1999-10-01), Krug et al.
patent: 6014628 (2000-01-01), Kovarik, Jr.
patent: 6018562 (2000-01-01), Willson
patent: 6076400 (2000-06-01), Bechwati et al.
patent: 6088423 (2000-07-01), Krug et al.
patent: 6094472 (2000-07-01), Smith
patent: 6118850 (2000-09-01), Mayo et al.
patent: 6163591 (2000-12-01), Benjamin
patent: 6198795 (2001-03-01), Naumann et al.
patent: 6218943 (2001-04-01), Ellenbogen
patent: 6272230 (2001-08-01), Hiraoglu et al.
patent: 6345113 (2002-02-01), Crawford et al.
patent: 2002/0176531 (2002-11-01), McClelland et al.
patent: 2002/0186862 (2002-12-01), McClelland et al.
patent: WO02/082290 (2002-10-01), None
“Multi-View Tomography, Model MVT” Brochure, Vivid Technologies, Inc., MVT0699, Rev. 1, (Release date Oct. 1997).
“Vivid VIS108”, Brochure, L-3 Communications Security and Detection Systems, Rev. 9/02.
I. D. Jupp et al, “The Non-Invasive Inspection of Baggage Using Coherent X-ray Scattering,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 47, No. 6, Dec. 2000, pp. 1987-1994.
Michael J. Barrientos, “Screener Threat Detec
Dawson Craig
Huang Ying
McClelland Keith M.
Whitson Andrea L.
Bruce David V.
L-3 Communications Security and Detection Systems
LandOfFree
Remote baggage screening system, software and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Remote baggage screening system, software and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Remote baggage screening system, software and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3233337