Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Implantable prosthesis – Bone
Reexamination Certificate
2001-08-06
2004-03-30
Willse, David H. (Department: 3738)
Prosthesis (i.e., artificial body members), parts thereof, or ai
Implantable prosthesis
Bone
C623S023470
Reexamination Certificate
active
06712858
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention concerns a reinforcing endoprosthesis for use in the femoral bone, which is resected both in the area of the ball of the natural hip joint and also in the area of the condyle of the natural knee joint. Accordingly, the reinforcing endoprosthesis has a shaft part in the area of the hip joint and has a condyle part in the area of the knee joint.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There are indications in which the stress on the corticalis of the femur must be relieved, since at the time of the indication, clinical pictures like arthritis, rheumatism, arthosis in the knee or osteoporosis in the hip joint area or trauma in the hip or knee joint area make surgical procedures appear necessary, although after therapy, there is hope that the corticalis of the femur can be restored to its natural function after some time.
A tumor endoprosthesis, like the one in DE-A-40 39 064, for example, may not give this only temporary relief of the reinforcing endoprosthesis sought, since the femoral bone must be completely removed to implant this tumor endoprosthesis because of the tumor. This type of endoprosthesis is not suitable for the special clinical picture given above as an example.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,384,373 shows another tumor endoprosthesis. Here, because of the tumor, a correspondingly large bone area is resected which is then no longer capable of a stress-relieving function. Likewise, an attempt is made to leave the patient as much natural bone material as possible. For this reason, the publication proposes using the tumor endoprosthesis in the intramedullar area, whereby the prosthesis has both a condyle part in the area of the knee joint and a bridge simulating the neck of the femur and other areas of the natural femoral bone, on whose end the artificial ball of the hip joint sits. Because of the indication, the residual bone—as already stated—cannot be stressed. The goal of implanting this type of tumor endoprosthesis is to give the patient as much help as possible, so the patient can move forward in the most natural way possible. This type of tumor prosthesis then has a permanent help function.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This prosthesis is not suitable for the above-mentioned indications.
On this background, the problem of this invention is to provide a reinforcing endoprosthesis for the femoral bone which performs a temporary stress-relieving function and which can be used universally, i.e., can be made of standard components for the individual patient.
This problem is solved by making the connecting part between the shaft part in the hip joint area and the condyle part in the artificial knee joint area with a two-piece intramedullary nail, whereby one part of the intramedullary nail is solid and has a threaded projection with a thread on it, and the other part of the intramedullary nail is hollow and has an inner thread that fits the thread on the first part, which can be screwed onto the thread, whereby the length of the endoprosthesis can be adjusted.
The connecting part works on the principle of a spindle screw. The operator can set the length of the intramedullary nail and hence the connecting part between the parts of the artificial joint for the individual patient and thus prepare the endoprosthesis. The endoprosthesis is composed of standard parts, especially the solid intramedullary nail and the hollow intramedullary nail. The shaft part or condyle part, selected based on the individual patient, can then be coupled to these two parts. The shaft part can preferably be stopped at the solid intramedullary nail by means of a safety screw connected to a conical clamping seat between a conical pin and a conical receptacle. The condyle part is also preferably held on the hollow intramedullary nail by the effect of a conical clamp between a conical receptable and a conical pin, whereby advantageously, a hexagon safety screw is in a corresponding receptacle at the place between the condyle part and the hollow intramedullary nail. This last measure gives it rotational stability.
It is also possible to put the corticalis under compression in relation to the femoral bone by purposely shortening the reinforcing endoprosthesis. This promotes the bone healing process.
When implanting the reinforcing endoprosthesis in the invention, the surgeon proceeds so that first the femur in the hip joint area, unlike the proposal in U.S. Pat. No. 4,384,373 already mentioned, is resected only by removing the neck of the femur with the top of the hip joint and in the knee joint area. Then the solid intramedullary nail, which is connected to a shaft part with a suitable size and shape, etc. for example, is pushed into the medullar space of the femoral bone. From the other side, the second, hollow intramedullary nail is pushed into the medullar space until the thread in the hollow intramedullary nail meets the thread in the solid intramedullary nail. The length of the reinforcing endoprosthesis is set by making a screwing motion with the first intramedullary nail in relation to the second intramedullary nail.
It is an advantage that the dimensions are designed so that the length of the intramedullary nail can vary up to 10 cm. This means that the length can be changed by ±5 cm from its normal position by adjusting the spindle screw.
The stresses that are normally undergone by the natural femur corticalis are now partly cushioned by the reinforcing endoprosthesis. Over time, the stress-relieving function decreases, and the corticalis takes heavier stresses until the natural stress can come back. This period of time for the transition from the stress on the endoprosthesis to the corticalis can be accompanied by prescribing medication for certain clinical pictures, for example, so the corticalis can take stress over time.
One special advantage is the design of the endoprosthesis so that the surface of the shaft part and the structural area of the condyle part on the resected femoral bone, at least partly, have a three-dimensional, open-mesh spatial network structure. The spatial network structure then lies on the spongiosa remaining in the femoral bone and stimulates the growth of bone trabeculae there. After a certain time, the implant is fully organized in the femoral bone and forms a tight bond with it. After the endoprosthesis has completely grown in, the bridging intramedullary nail has practically no stress-relieving function to perform.
When an endoprosthesis is used on a fractured femur, often osteosynthesis plates are used to set the fractured bone parts and mechanically stabilize the fracture site during healing. This works well in practice, but has the disadvantage that the osteosynthesis plates often cannot be set symmetrically around the fracture, so that due to the resultant asymmetry, asymmetries result with regard to the forces introduced into the corticalis of the femur. In patients who, as in this case, have to be supplied with two artificial joints, i.e., with an artificial hip joint and with an artificial knee joint, the question often arises of the mechanical stability of the implant, especially with additional fracture of the femur. This type of difficult indication occurs after severe accidents, for example.
Here again, the endoprosthesis in the invention provides help, since it gives intramedullary support until the ultimate healing of the fracture and can immediately take stress.
The rotational stability of the reinforcing endoprosthesis is advantageously ensured by the fact that the parts that go into the femur have rotationally unsymmetrical contours.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4384373 (1983-05-01), Sivash
patent: 4502160 (1985-03-01), Moore et al.
patent: 4673409 (1987-06-01), Van Kampen
patent: 4892546 (1990-01-01), Kotz et al.
patent: 5137535 (1992-08-01), Keller
patent: 5358524 (1994-10-01), Richelsoph
patent: 5433750 (1995-07-01), Gradinger et al.
patent: 5765957 (1998-06-01), Connell
patent: 31 38 848 (1983-04-01), None
patent: 33 36 004 (1985-06-01), None
patent: 35 35 158 (1987-04-01), None
patent: 3605630 (1987-09-01), None
patent: 39 03 438 (1990
Ascherl Rudolf
Grundei Hans
LandOfFree
Reinforcement endoprosthesis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Reinforcement endoprosthesis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reinforcement endoprosthesis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3218713