Reffinate hydroconversion process

Mineral oils: processes and products – Chemical conversion of hydrocarbons – With preliminary treatment of feed

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C208S018000, C208S027000, C208S028000, C208S033000, C208S086000, C208S133000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06592748

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to lubricating oil basestocks and to a process for preparing lubricating oil basestocks having high viscosity indices and low volatilities.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is well known to produce lubricating oil basestocks by solvent refining. In the conventional process, crude oils are fractionated under atmospheric pressure to produce atmospheric resids which are further fractionated under vacuum. Select distillate fractions are then optionally deasphalted and solvent extracted to produce a paraffin rich raffinate and an aromatics rich extract. The raffinate is then dewaxed to produce a dewaxed oil which is usually hydrofinished to improve stability and remove color bodies.
Solvent refining is a process which selectively isolates components of crude oils having desirable properties for lubricant basestocks. Thus the crude oils used for solvent refining are restricted to those which are highly paraffinic in nature as aromatics tend to have lower viscosity indices (VI), and are therefore less desirable in lubricating oil basestocks. Also, certain types of aromatic compounds can result in unfavorable toxicity characteristics. Solvent refining can produce lubricating oil basestocks have a VI of about 95 in good yields.
Today more severe operating conditions for automobile engines have resulted in demands for basestocks with lower volatilities (while retaining low viscosities) and lower pour points. These improvements can only be achieved with basestocks of more isoparaffinic character, i.e., those with VI's of 105 or greater. Solvent refining alone cannot economically produce basestocks having a VI of 105 with typical crudes. Two alternative approaches have been developed to produce high quality lubricating oil basestocks; (1) wax isomerization and (2) hydrocracking. Both of the methods involve high capital investments and suffer from yield debits. Moreover, hydrocracking eliminates some of the solvency properties of basestocks produced by traditional solvent refining techniques. Also, the typically low quality feedstocks used in hydrocracking, and the consequent severe conditions required to achieve the desired viscometric and volatility properties can result in the formation of undesirable (toxic) species. These species are formed in sufficient concentration that a further processing step such as extraction is needed to achieve a non-toxic base stock.
An article by S. Bull and A. Marmin entitled “Lube Oil Manufacture by Severe Hydrotreatment”,
Proceedings of the Tenth World Petroleum Congress, Volume
4,
Developments in Lubrication, PD
19(2), pages 221-228, describes a process wherein the extraction unit in solvent refining is replaced by a hydrotreater.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,691,067 describes a process for producing a medium and high VI oil by hydrotreating a narrow cut lube feedstock. The hydrotreating step involves a single hydrotreating zone. U.S. Pat. No. 3,732,154 discloses hydrofinishing the extract or raffinate from a solvent extraction process. The feed to the hydrofinishing step is derived from a highly aromatic source such as a naphthenic distillate. U.S. Pat. No. 4,627,908 relates to a process for improving the bulk oxidation stability and storage stability of lube oil basestocks derived from hydrocracked bright stock. The process involves hydrodenitrification of a hydrocracked bright stock followed by hydrofinishing.
It would be desirable to supplement the conventional solvent refining process so as to produce high VI, low volatility oils which have excellent toxicity, oxidative and thermal stability, solvency, fuel economy and cold start properties without incurring any significant yield debit which process requires much lower investment costs than competing technologies such as hydrocracking.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a process for producing a lubricating oil basestock which comprises:
(a) conducting a lubricating oil feedstock to a solvent extraction zone and under-extracting the feedstock to form an under-extracted raffinate wherein the extraction zone solvent contains water added in the amount from about 1 to about 10 vol. %, based on extraction solvent, such that the extraction solvent contains from 3 to 10 vol. % water;
(b) stripping the under-extracted raffinate of solvent to produce an under-extracted raffinate feed having a dewaxed oil viscosity index from about 75 to about 105;
(c) passing the raffinate feed to a first hydroconversion zone and processing the raffinate feed in the presence of a non-acidic catalyst at a temperature of from about 320 to about 420° C., a hydrogen partial pressure of from about 800 to about 2500 psig (5.6 to 17.3 mPa), space velocity of about 0.2 to about 5.0 LHSV, and a hydrogen to feed ratio of from about 500 to about 5000 Scf/B (89 to 890 m
3
/m
3
) to produce a first hydroconverted raffinate; and
(d) passing the first hydroconverted raffinate to a second reaction zone and conducting cold hydrofinishing of the first hydroconverted raffinate in the presence of a hydrofinishing catalyst at a temperature of from about 200 to about 360° C., a hydrogen partial pressure of from about 800 to about 2500 psig (5.6 to 17.3 mPa), a space velocity of from about 1 to about 10 LHSV, and a hydrogen to feed ratio of from about 500 to about 5000 Scf/B (89 to 890 m
3
/m
3
) to produce a hydrofinished raffinate.
The basestocks produced by the process according to the invention have excellent low volatility properties for a given viscosity thereby meeting future industry engine oil standards while achieving good solvency, cold start, fuel economy, oxidation stability and thermal stability properties. In addition, toxicity tests show that the basestock has excellent toxicological properties as measured by tests such as the FDA(c) test.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3155608 (1964-11-01), Hopper et al.
patent: 3691067 (1972-09-01), Ashton et al.
patent: 3732154 (1973-05-01), Mills et al.
patent: 3779896 (1973-12-01), Woodle
patent: 3926777 (1975-12-01), Menzl
patent: 3929616 (1975-12-01), Meade et al.
patent: 4081352 (1978-03-01), West et al.
patent: 4304660 (1981-12-01), Sequeira, Jr. et al.
patent: 4311583 (1982-01-01), Woodle
patent: 4383913 (1983-05-01), Powell et al.
patent: 4622129 (1986-11-01), Bayle et al.
patent: 4627908 (1986-12-01), Miller
patent: 4636299 (1987-01-01), Unmuth et al.
patent: 4764265 (1988-08-01), Bijwaard et al.
patent: 4849093 (1989-07-01), Vauk et al.
patent: 4853104 (1989-08-01), Degnan, Jr. et al.
patent: 4906350 (1990-03-01), Lucien et al.
patent: 4911821 (1990-03-01), Katzer et al.
patent: 5013422 (1991-05-01), Absil et al.
patent: 5039399 (1991-08-01), Sequeira, Jr.
patent: 5110445 (1992-05-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5171426 (1992-12-01), Mead et al.
patent: 5178750 (1993-01-01), Mead
patent: 5242579 (1993-09-01), Mead et al.
patent: 5273645 (1993-12-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5275718 (1994-01-01), Copeland et al.
patent: 5292426 (1994-03-01), Holland et al.
patent: 5300213 (1994-04-01), Bartilucci et al.
patent: 5302279 (1994-04-01), Degnan et al.
patent: 5393408 (1995-02-01), Ziemer et al.
patent: 5616238 (1997-04-01), Boyle et al.
patent: 5855767 (1999-01-01), Powers et al.
patent: 5911874 (1999-06-01), Cody et al.
patent: 5935416 (1999-08-01), Cody et al.
patent: 5935417 (1999-08-01), Cody et al.
patent: 5976353 (1999-11-01), Cody et al.
patent: 5993644 (1999-11-01), Xiao et al.
patent: 6096189 (2000-08-01), Cody et al.
patent: 6099719 (2000-08-01), Cody et al.
patent: 0471524 (1992-02-01), None
patent: 0649896 (1995-04-01), None
patent: 1240913 (1971-07-01), None
patent: 1546504 (1979-05-01), None
patent: 2059433 (1981-04-01), None
patent: 2001339 (1982-02-01), None
S. Bull & A. Marmin,Lube Oil Manufacture by Severe Hydrotreatment, 1979, Proceedings of the Tenth World Petroleum Congress, vol. 4, pp. 221-228.
A.S. Galiano-Roth & N.M. Page,Effect of Hydroprocessing on Lubricant Base Stock Composition and Product Performance, 08/94, Journal of the Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engineers, vol. 50, 8, pp. 659-664.
A.K. Rhodes,Refinery Oper

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reffinate hydroconversion process does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Reffinate hydroconversion process, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reffinate hydroconversion process will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3074384

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.