Optical: systems and elements – Deflection using a moving element – Using a periodically moving element
Reexamination Certificate
1999-08-26
2003-06-17
Tweel, John (Department: 2632)
Optical: systems and elements
Deflection using a moving element
Using a periodically moving element
C359S199200
Reexamination Certificate
active
06580538
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to lightwave communication systems and, more particularly, to coding techniques used in the transmission of information in dense wavelength division multiplexing systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Optical fiber is becoming a preferred transmission medium for many communication networks because of the speed and bandwidth advantages associated with optical transmission. In particular, wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) is being used to meet the increasing demands for more speed and bandwidth in optical transmission applications. In its simplest form, WDM is a technique whereby parallel data streams modulating light at different wavelengths are coupled simultaneously into the same optical fiber. A WDM signal is typically viewed as a composite signal comprising a parallel set of optical channels sharing a single transmission medium, wherein each optical channel uses a slightly different frequency (wavelength of light). Although each optical channel actually includes a range of frequencies (wavelengths), those skilled in the art typically refer to an optical channel in terms of its center wavelength. As such, the terms “optical channel”, “wavelength channel”, and wavelength are typically used interchangeably in the WDM context to refer to a constituent optical signal within the composite WDM signal.
With recent advances in optical networking technology, system manufacturers are now contemplating WDM systems that carry, for example, as many as 40, 80, or more optical channels in a single fiber and with bit rates up to 10 Gbps per channel. However, despite the many advantages of WDM, there are certain limitations that arise as a result of using a separate optical channel for carrying traffic from each source or user, which is a typical transport arrangement in WDM systems. For example, the number of users that can be supported by a WDM system is limited by the number of available optical channels. The total bandwidth in a WDM system may also be used inefficiently if optical channels are not being used to transport information at the maximum possible bit rate. Furthermore, the electronic components used for processing the optically transmitted information at nodes in a WDM system lag behind photonic components in terms of transmission speed capabilities. Although many user systems supply information in parallel format, prior WDM transport schemes incorporate multiple serial-to-parallel and parallel-to-serial conversions, thus resulting in latency and delay.
In optical transmission systems, it is also well-known that fiber nonlinearities can affect the integrity of data transmitted in the optical channels, thereby degrading system performance. Some of the nonlinearities include, for example, four wave mixing, stimulated Raman scattering, and stimulated Brillouin scattering, to name a few. For a more detailed description of these optical nonlinearities, see, e.g., Kaminow et al.,
“Optical Fiber Telecommunications”
, Vol. IIIA, pp. 199-203, 212-225, and 239-248 (1997) and Maeda et al.,
“The Effect of Four
-
Wave Mixing in Fibers on Optical Frequency
-
Division Multiplexed Systems”
, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 8, No. 9, pp. 1402-1408 (1990), each of which is incorporated by reference herein. Four wave mixing is of particular concern for WDM systems.
Briefly, four wave mixing is a third order nonlinearity in which three input signals generate a fourth signal which may degrade the system's performance via crosstalk. More specifically, three waves of frequencies (e.g., f
i
, f
j
, and f
k
) interact through the third order electric susceptibility of the optical fiber to generate a fourth wave of frequency (f
fwm
) defined by f
fwm
=f
i
+f
j
−f
k
. Thus, three co-propagating waves give rise to nine new components. In a WDM system, this interaction occurs for every possible choice of three waves (i.e., optical channels), which can result in the generation of hundreds of new components. As such, four wave mixing contribution to crosstalk and the resultant signal to noise degradation can be especially problematic for WDM systems having a plurality of optical channels.
Four wave mixing effects also depend on the coherent presence of energy. As such, four wave mixing is a concern for intensity modulated systems, e.g., where the presence of a pulse indicates the symbol or bit “one” and the absence of a pulse indicates a symbol or bit “zero”. More specifically, if a bit “one” is being transmitted in one or more adjacent optical channels in the same segment of the optical fiber, then the effects of four wave mixing can be greater than a case where one channel has a bit “one” and one or more of the other channels has a bit “zero”.
FIG. 1A
illustrates this principle in a simplified example of a typical WDM transmission scheme in which data is transmitted serially in each of the optical channels so that data transmission in any given optical channel is independent of data transmission in another optical channel. More specifically,
FIG. 1A
shows three optical channels
101
-
103
(wavelengths &lgr;
1
, &lgr;
2
, and &lgr;
3
), each carrying serially transmitted data represented as bit sequences, e.g., bit sequence a
0
-a
4
in optical channel
101
, bit sequence b
0
-b
4
in optical channel
102
, and bit sequence c
0
-c
4
in optical channel
103
. For this example, bits a
0
, b
0
, and c
0
each occur at time slot t
0
, bits a
1
, b
1
, and c
1
at time slot t
1
, and so on. In this way, the bits in each of the individual optical channels at a particular time slot (e.g., a bit period) are considered to be coincidental bits, e.g, a
0
, b
0
, and c
0
at time t
0
shown in block
104
. Because effects of four wave mixing depend on bit values, e.g., “ones” or “zeros”, of coincidental bits in different optical channels, traditional WDM transmission schemes that transmit data serially and independently in each optical channel therefore are particularly susceptible to crosstalk contributed by four wave mixing.
FIG. 1B
illustrates how propagation delays in the individual optical channels can further complicate the identification coincidental bits having bit values which may give rise to four wave mixing effects. In particular, it is well known that light pulses may travel at different velocities in different optical channels of a WDM signal, i.e., at different wavelengths. For example,
FIG. 1A
shows how bits a
4
, b
4
, and c
4
are coincidental at time slot t
4
(e.g., within a bit period) at the transmitter end. However, these bits may not be coincidental (e.g., within a bit period) at the receiver end because of different delays experienced at different wavelengths. As shown in
FIG. 1B
after propagation delays, bit a
4
is coincidental at time t
4
with bits b
3
and c
2
as shown by block
105
. So, bit values of coincidental bits are important both at the near-end (e.g., transmit end) and far-end (e.g., receive end) of a system since four wave mixing may develop as a result of propagation delays in the optical channels.
Consequently, advantages of using WDM in optical transmission are tempered by the problems caused by fiber nonlinearities, inefficient bandwidth utilization, and delays associated with serial-to-parallel/parallel-to-serial conversions in prior WDM transport schemes that transmit data serially in individual WDM optical channels.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Crosstalk and signal to noise degradation contributed by fiber nonlinearities in a WDM system are reduced according to the principles of the invention by transporting data in a parallel format using a plurality of optical channels in a WDM signal as a parallel bus and by coding the parallel-formatted data so that bit patterns in the parallel-formatted information that would otherwise contribute to nonlinear impairments are changed.
More specifically, a WDM parallel bus architecture is described in detail in my co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/237,122 (Kartalopoulos 11), which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. B
Lucent Technologies - Inc.
Murgia Gregory J.
Tweel John
LandOfFree
Reduction of optical impairments in wavelength division... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Reduction of optical impairments in wavelength division..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reduction of optical impairments in wavelength division... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3092161