Reduction in bacterial colonization by administering...

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving nucleic acid

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C424S093100

Reexamination Certificate

active

08003323

ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides a method for reducing the risk of bacterial infection or sepsis in a susceptible patient by treating the susceptible patient with a pharmaceutical composition containing bacteriophage of one or more strains which produce lytic infections in pathogenic bacteria. Preferably, treatment of the patient reduces the level of colonization with pathogenic bacteria susceptible to the bacteriophage by at least one log. In a typical embodiment, the susceptible patient is an immunocompromised patient selected from the group consisting of leukemia patients, lymphoma patients, carcinoma patients, sarcoma patients, allogeneic transplant patients, congenital or acquired immunodeficiency patients, cystic fibrosis patients, and AIDS patients. In a preferred mode, the patients treated by this method are colonized with the pathogenic bacteria subject to infection by said bacteriophage.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4375734 (1983-03-01), Kozloff et al.
patent: 4891210 (1990-01-01), Norris
patent: 4957686 (1990-09-01), Norris
patent: 5132221 (1992-07-01), Ward et al.
patent: 5612182 (1997-03-01), Pearson et al.
patent: 5641464 (1997-06-01), Briggs, III et al.
patent: 5660812 (1997-08-01), Merril et al.
patent: 5688501 (1997-11-01), Merril et al.
patent: 5766892 (1998-06-01), Merril et al.
patent: 5811093 (1998-09-01), Merril et al.
patent: 6015816 (2000-01-01), Kostyniak et al.
patent: 6056954 (2000-05-01), Fischetti et al.
patent: 6121036 (2000-09-01), Ghanbari et al.
patent: 6322783 (2001-11-01), Takahashi
patent: 6942858 (2005-09-01), Ghanbari et al.
patent: 2005/0260171 (2005-11-01), Ghanbari et al.
patent: 3714699 (1988-01-01), None
patent: 198 28 596 (1999-02-01), None
patent: 0 290 295 (1988-11-01), None
patent: 0 414 304 (1991-02-01), None
patent: 0 510 907 (1992-10-01), None
patent: 2 253 859 (1992-09-01), None
patent: 62-123104 (1987-06-01), None
patent: WO 90/13631 (1990-11-01), None
patent: WO 95/27043 (1995-10-01), None
patent: WO 97/39111 (1997-10-01), None
patent: WO 00/69269 (2000-11-01), None
Bolder et al. The effect of flavophospholipol (Flavomycin) and salinomycin sodium (Sacox) on the excretion ofClostridium perfringens, Salmonella enteritidis, andCampylobacter jejuniin broilers after experimental infection. Poult Sci. Dec. 1999;78(12):1681-9.
Smith et al. Factors Influencing the Survival and Multiplication of Bacteriophages in Calves and in Their Environment. Journal of General Microbiology 133 (1987), 1127-1135.
Adamia, Revaz S., et al., “The Virulent Bacteriophage IRA ofSalmonella typhimurium: Cloning of Phage Genes which are Potentially Lethal for the Host Cell”, J Basic Microbiol., vol. 30, p. 707-716, 1990.
Alavidze, A., et al., “Isolationof Specific Lytic Phages Multidrug ResistantPseudomonas aeruginosa”, The American Society for Microbiology, vol. 99, p. 447, 1999.
Alavidze, Z., et al., “Isolation of Specific Lytic Phases against Multidrug ResistantPseudomonas aeraiginosa”, American Society for Microbiology, Final Program, 1999.
Barrow, et al., “Salmonellosis—Prospects for Microbiological Control in Poultry”, Avian Pathology, vol. 18, p. 557-561, 1989.
Barrow, et. al., Use of Lytic Bacteriophage for Control of ExperimentalEscherichia coliSepticemia and Meningitis in Chickens and Calves. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 5(3): 294-298. 1998.
Barrow, P. A., “Bacteriophages Mediating Somatic Antigenic Conversion inSalmonella cholerae-suis: their Isolation from Sewage and OtherSalmonellaSerotypes Processing the Somatic 6 Antigen”, Journal of General Microbiology, vol. 132, p. 835-837, 1986.
Barrow, Paul A., et al., “Bacteriophage Therpay and Prophylaxis: Rediscovery and Renewed Assessment of Potential”, Trends in Microbiology, vol. 5, p. 268-271, 1997.
Berchieri, A., Jr., et al., The Activity in the Chicken Alimentary Tract of Bacteriophages Lytic forSalmonella typhimurium, Res. Microbiol., vol. 142, p. 541-549, 1991.
Bogovazova, G. G., et al., “Immunobiological Properties & Therapeutic Effectiveness of Preparations from Klebsiella Bacteriophages”, Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol., vol. 3, p. 30-33, 1992.
Carlton , R., Phage Therapy: Past History and Future Prospects Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 47: 267-274, 1999.
Gachechiladze, K. K., et al., “Host-Controlled Modification and Restriction as a Criterion of Evaluating the Therapeutical Potential ofPseudomonasPhage”, J. Basic Microbiol., vol. 31, p. 101-106, 1991.
Karin E. Byers et al., “Disinfection of Hospital Rooms Contaminated with Vancomyci- ResistantEnterococcus faecum”, col. 4, p. 261-264, Apr. 1988.
Kudva, Indira T., et al., “Biocontrol ofEscherichia coliO157 with O157-Specific Bacteriophages”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 65, p. 3767-3773, 1999.
Lenski, Richard E., “Dynamics of Interactions Between Bacteria and Virulent Bacteriphage”, Adv. Microb., Ecol., vol. 10, p. 1-44, 1988.
Levin, Bruce R., et al., “Phage Therapy Revisited: The Population Biology of a Bacterial Infection and its Treatment with Bacteriophage and Antibiotics”, The American Naturalist, vol. 147, p. 881-898, 1996.
Ochs, Hans D., “Immunologic Responses to Bacteriophage φX 174 in Immunodeficiency Diseases”, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 50, p. 2559-2567, 1971.
Risi, et al. Prevention of Infection in the Immunocompromised host, American Jouranl Infect. Control 26: 594-604, 1998.
Slopek, et al., “Results of Bacteriophage Treatment of Suppurative Bacterial Infections; I. General Evaluation of the Results”, Arch. Immunol. Therapiae Exper., vol. 31, p. 267-291, 1983.
Slopek, et al., “Results of Bacteriophage Treatment of Suppurative Bacterial Infections; III. Detailed Evaluation of the Results Obtained in Further 150 cases”, Ach. Immunol. Therapiae Exper., vol. 32, p. 317-335, 1984.
Slopek, et al., “Results of Bacteriophage Treatment of Suppurative Bacterial Infections; IV. Evaluation of the Results Obtained in 370 cases”, Arch. Immunol. Therapiae Exper., vol. 33, p. 219-240, 1985.
Slopek, et al., “Results of Bacteriophage Treatment of Suppurative Bacterial Infections; V. Evaluation of the Results Obtained I Children”, Arch. Immunol. Therapiae Exper., vol. 33, p. 241-260, 1985.
Slopek, et al., “Results of Bacteriophage Treatment of Suppurative Bacterial Infections; VI. Analysis of Treatment of Suppurative Staphylococcal Infections”, Arch. Immunol. Therapiae Exper., vol. 33, p. 261-275, 1985.
Slopek, et al., “Results of Bacteriophage Treatment of Suppurative Bacterial Infections in the Years 1981-1986”, Arch. Immunol. Therapiae Exper., vol. 35, p. 569-584, 1987.
Slopek, et al., Results of Bacteriophage Treatment of Suppurative Bacterial Infections; II. Detailed Evaluation of the Results, Arch. Immunol. Therapiae Exper., vol. 31, p. 293-327, 1981.
Slopek, S., et al., “Results of Bacteriophage Treatment of Suppurative Bacterial Infections VI. Analysis of Treatment of Supparative Staphylococcal Infections”, Database Biosis ′Online, Biosciences Information Service, 1985.
Soothill, J. S., “Bacteriophage Prevents Destruction of Skin Graft byPseudomonas aeruginosa”, Bums, vol. 20, p. 209-211, 1994.
Soothill, J. S., et al., “The Efficacy of Phages in the Prevention of the Destruction of Pig Skin in vitro byPseudomonas aerarginosa”, Med. Sci. Res., vol. 16, p. 1287-1288, 1988.
Soothill, J.S., “Treatment of Experimental Infections of Mice with Bacteriophages”, J. Med. Microbiol., vol. 37, p. 258-261, 1992.
Williams Smith, H., et al., “Effectiveness of Phages in Treating ExperimentalEscherichia coilDiarrhoea in Calves, Piglets and Lambs”, Journal of General Microbiology, vol. 129, p. 2659-2675, 1983.
Williams Smith, H., et al., “Effectiveness of Phages in Treating ExperimentalEscherichia coliDiarrhoea in Calves by Means

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reduction in bacterial colonization by administering... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Reduction in bacterial colonization by administering..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reduction in bacterial colonization by administering... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2791971

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.