Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Designated organic active ingredient containing – 3,10-dihydroxy-2-naphthacene carboxamide or derivative doai
Reexamination Certificate
2000-02-16
2004-06-29
Criares, Theodore J. (Department: 1617)
Drug, bio-affecting and body treating compositions
Designated organic active ingredient containing
3,10-dihydroxy-2-naphthacene carboxamide or derivative doai
Reexamination Certificate
active
06756365
ABSTRACT:
RESEARCH REPORT
The research for the present invention was supported by funds obtained through Tufts University.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention concerns therapeutic tetracycline treatment of living cells, and is particularly directed to methods and materials for altering and overcoming resistance to tetracycline within microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, rickettsia, and the like.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The development of the tetracycline antibiotics was the direct result of a systematic screening of soil specimens collected from many parts of the world for evidence of microorganisms capable of producing bacteriocidal and/or bacteriostatic compositions. The first of these novel compounds was introduced in 1948 under the name chlortetracycline. Two years later oxytetracycline became available. The detailed elucidation of the chemical structure of these agents confirmed their similarity and furnished the analytical basis for the production of a third member of this group in 1952, tetracycline. By 1957, a new family of tetracycline compositions characterized chemically by the absence of the ring-attached CH
3
group present in the earlier compositions was prepared and became publicly available in 1959 under the official name demeclocycline. Subsequently, methacycline, a derivative of oxytetracycline, was introduced in 1966; doxycycline became available by 1967; and minocycline was in use by 1972. For clarity, for general ease of understanding, and for comparison purposes, these individual tetracycline type agents are structurally compared within Table I below.
TABLE I
TETRACYCLINE
At Carbon
Congener
Substituents(s)
Position Nos.
Chlortetracycline
—Cl
(7)
Oxytetracycline
—OH, —H
(5)
Demeclocycline
—OH, —H; —Cl
(6; 7)
Methacycline
—OH, —H; ═CH
2
(5; 6)
Doxycycline
—OH, —H; —CH
3
, —H
(5; 6)
Minocycline
—H, —H; —N(CH
3
)
2
(6; 7)
Subsequent to these initial developments, much research effort was focused on developing new tetracycline antibiotic compositions effective under varying therapeutic conditions and routes of administration; and for developing new tetracycline analogues which might prove to be equal or more effective than the originally introduced tetracycline families beginning in 1948. Representative of such developments are U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,957,980; 3,674,859; 2,980,584; 2,990,331; 3,062,717; 3,557,280; 4,018,889; 4,024,272; 4,126,680; 3,454,697; and 3,165,531. It will be understood that these issued patents are merely representative of the range of diversity of investigations seeking tetracycline and tetracycline analogue compositions which are pharmacologically active.
Historically, soon after their initial development and introduction, the tetracyclines regardless of specific formulation or chemical structure were found to be highly effective pharmacologically against rickettsiae; a number of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria; and the agents responsible for lymphogranuloma venereum, inclusion conjunctivitis, and psittacosis. Hence, tetracyclines became known as “broad spectrum” antibiotics. With the subsequent establishment of their in-vitro antimicrobial activity, effectiveness in experimental infections, and pharmacological properties, the tetracyclines as a class rapidly became widely used for therapeutic purposes. However, this widespread use of tetracyclines for both major and minor illnesses and diseases led directly to the emergence of resistance to these antibiotics even among highly susceptible bacterial species both commensal and pathogenic—as for example
pneumococci
and Salmonella. The rise of tetracycline-resistant organisms has led not only to a general decline in use of tetracyclines and tetracycline analogue compositions as antibiotics of choice, but has also launched major efforts and investigations to uncover the mechanism for tetracycline resistance—in the hope that some effective means might be developed to overcome the problem of tetracycline-resistance and thus reestablish the pharmacological value and efficacy of tetracyclines as a whole.
The following represents a current summary of the investigations and knowledge regarding the mechanism of action for tetracyclines in bacteria. The principal site of action for tetracyclines is the bacterial ribosome; at least two different processes appear to be required for tetracyclines to gain access to the cytoplasm and the ribosomes of bacteria. The first process is a passive diffusion of the tetracycline through hydrophilic pores located in the outer cell membrane. One of these structures is the major outer membrane protein, Omp F in
E. coli
. The second process involves an energy-dependent active transport system that pumps all tetracyclines through the inner cytoplasmic membrane into the cytoplasm of the cell. In the tetracycline-sensitive cell or organism, once the tetracycline gains access to the interior of the cell, it is able to bind to the ribosomes and inhibit protein synthesis. However, in many tetracycline resistant cells and organisms, an efflux pump system is present which appears to bind the tetracycline molecule and actively transports the tetracycline molecule out of the organism into the surrounding environment. This active efflux employs an inner membrane protein designated TET (or Tet) protein which is synthesized in the cell from a gene which is generally acquired by the organism. Often the gene is present on an extra-chromosomal, autonomously replicating plasmid or a transposon.
Tetracycline resistance is often regulated—that is, inducible by tetracycline. Investigations of active tetracycline efflux systems and the details of the active efflux mechanism of action have been well documented and include the following publications, each of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein: Chopra et al.,
J. Antimicrobiol. Chemotherapy
8:5-21 (1981); Levy and McMurry,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.
56:1060-1068 (1974); Levy and McMurry,
Nature
275:90-92 (1978); McMurry and Levy,
Antimicrobial Agents And Chemotherapy
114:201-209 (1978); McMurry et al.,
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
77:3974-3977 (1980); Ball et al.,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.
93:74-81 (1980); Curiale and Levy,
J. Bact.
151:209-2115 (1982); Mendez et al.,
Plasmid
3:99-108 (1980); Curiale et al.,
J. Bact.
157:211-217 (1984); and Levy, S. B.,
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
24:1-3 (1989).
In addition, a second mechanism of tetracycline resistance for cells is known and in effect. This resistance mechanism involves a cytoplasmic protein which protects the intracellular ribosomes from the inhibitory action of tetracyclines. This form of tetracycline resistance is described within Burdett, V.,
J. Bact.
165:564-569 (1986); and Levy, S. B.,
J. Antimicrob. Chem.
24:1-3 (1989).
With the increased understanding and knowledge regarding the origin and the mechanisms of tetracycline resistance in various cells and microorganisms, active investigations and developments seeking means for overcoming these mechanisms, notably the active efflux system have been attempted. One successful approach is described within U.S. Pat. No. 4,806,529 issued Feb. 21, 1989—an innovation which is a precursor of more recent developments, namely U.S. Pat. No. 5,064,821 issued Nov. 12, 1991. Clearly, additional methods and materials for overcoming tetracycline-resistance in bacteria and other organisms are most desirable and needed. Substantive advances which additionally overcome the active efflux system for tetracycline and/or the ribosomal protection mechanism in the resistant cell would be presently recognized by the ordinary practitioner in the art as a major asset and innovation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides methods and compositions for therapeutically treating a tetracycline-resistant cell and also provides a method for altering a cell from a tetracycline-resistant state into a tetracycline-sensitive state. In one preferred embodiment, this method comprises the steps of: administering to the cell a predetermined quantity of at least a first composition selec
Criares Theodore J.
Hanley, Esq. Elizabeth A.
Lahive & Cockfield LLP
Trustees of Tufts College
Williams, Esq. Magan E.
LandOfFree
Reducing tetracycline resistance in living cells does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Reducing tetracycline resistance in living cells, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reducing tetracycline resistance in living cells will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3327229