Telecommunications – Radiotelephone system – Zoned or cellular telephone system
Reexamination Certificate
2003-03-18
2004-06-22
Milord, Marceau (Department: 2682)
Telecommunications
Radiotelephone system
Zoned or cellular telephone system
C455S437000, C455S439000, C455S441000, C455S442000, C455S524000, C455S525000, C370S331000, C370S332000, C370S347000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06754496
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to cellular mobile communication networks, for example Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) cellular networks.
2. Description of the Prior Art
FIG. 1
of the accompanying drawings shows parts of a cellular mobile telecommunication network according to the Telecommunication Industries Association (TIA)/Electronic Industries Association (EIA) Standard TIA/EIA/IS-95 of October 1994 (hereinafter “IS95”). Each of three base transceiver stations (BTSs)
4
(BTS
1
, BTS
2
and BTS
3
) is connected via a fixed network
5
to a base station controller (BSC)
6
, which is in turn connected to a mobile switching center (MSC)
7
. The BSC
6
serves to manage the radio resources of its connected BTSs
4
, for example by performing hand-off and allocating radio channels. The MSC
7
serves to provide switching functions and coordinates location registration and call delivery.
Each BTS
4
serves a cell
8
. When a mobile station (MS)
10
is in a so-called “soft hand-off” (SHO) region
9
where two or more cells overlap, a mobile station can receive transmission signals (downlink signals) of comparable strength and quality from the respective BTSs of the overlapping cells. Transmission signals (uplink signals) produced by the mobile station (MS) can also be received at comparable strengths and qualities by these different BTSs when the mobile station is in the SHO region
9
.
FIG. 2
of the accompanying drawings shows a situation where the MS
10
is located within the SHO region
9
, and is transmitting such uplink signals that are being received by plural BTSs
4
. According to the IS95 standard, a BTS
4
that receives such an uplink signal from the MS
10
relays the signal to the BSC
6
via a dedicated connection line of the fixed network
5
. At the BSC
6
, one of the relayed signals is selected based on a comparison of the quality of each of the received signals, and the selected signal is relayed to the MSC
7
. This selection is referred to as Selection Diversity.
Similarly,
FIG. 3
of the accompanying drawings shows a situation where the MS
10
is located within the SHO region
9
and is receiving downlink signals from plural BTSs
4
. According to the IS95 standard, downlink signals received by the BSC
6
from the MSC
7
are relayed to all BTSs
4
involved in the soft hand-off via respective connection lines of the fixed network
5
, and subsequently transmitted by all the BTSs
4
to the MS
10
. At the MS
10
the multiple signals may be combined, for example, by using maximum ratio combination (MRC), or one of them may be selected based on the signal strength or quality, i.e. using Selection Diversity as for the uplink case.
In contrast to, for example, Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) networks, in CDMA networks each BTS
4
transmits at the same frequency. Consequently, careful control of transmission power must be maintained to minimize interference problems.
Signals are transmitted as a succession of frames according to the IS95 standard. As
FIG. 4
of the accompanying drawings shows, each frame is of duration 20 ms, and comprises sixteen 1.25 ms time slots. In each time slot several bits of user data and/or control information can be transmitted.
Power control of transmissions from the MS
10
to the BTSs
4
(uplink power control) in IS95 is achieved as follows. When a BTS
4
receives a signal from the MS
10
it determines whether a predetermined property of the received signal (for example absolute signal level, signal to noise ratio (SNR), signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), bit error rate (BER) or frame error rate (FER)) exceeds a pre-selected threshold level. Based on this determination, the BTS
4
instructs the MS
10
either to reduce or to increase its transmission power in the next time slot.
For this purpose, two bits in every time slot of a pilot channel (PCH) from the BTS
4
to the MS
10
are allocated for uplink power control (see FIG.
4
). Both bits have the same value, and accordingly will be referred to hereinafter as the “power control bit” (or PCB) in the singular. The power control bit is assigned a value of zero by the BTS
4
if the MS
10
is required to increase transmission power by 1 dB, and a value of one if the MS
10
is required to decrease transmission power by 1 dB. The BTS
4
is not able to request directly that the MS
10
maintain the same transmission power; only by alternately transmitting ones and zeros in the power control bit is the transmission power maintained at the same level.
When the MS
10
is in a SHO region
9
, the MS
10
is required to make a decision on whether to increase or to decrease uplink transmission power based on a plurality of power control bits received respectively from the BTSs
4
involved in the soft hand-off. Consequently, an OR function is performed on all the power control bits. If the result of this OR function is zero then the MS
10
will increase power on uplink transmissions, and if the result is one then the MS
10
will decrease power on uplink transmissions. In this way, uplink transmission power is only increased if all BTSs
4
ask for an increase.
Power control of transmissions from the BTS
4
to the MS
10
(downlink power control) in IS95 is achieved as follows. When the MS
10
receives a downlink signal from a BTS
4
(or from each of a plurality of BTSs
4
in soft hand-off operation) via a traffic channel (TCH), the FER of that signal is calculated by the MS
10
. The FER reflects the degree to which the traffic-channel signal has been corrupted by, for example, noise. This FER is then relayed by the MS
10
to the BTS
4
which transmitted the downlink signal concerned, and the BTS
4
uses this FER to decide whether to make any change to its downlink transmission power.
The soft hand-off system described above is effective in improving signal transmission between the MS
10
and the network when the MS
10
is located in regions of cell overlap near the boundaries of the individual cells. Signal quality in these regions when using a single BTS
4
may be relatively poor, but by making use of more than one BTS
4
the quality may be substantially improved.
However, the IS95 soft hand-off system has the disadvantage of increasing signal traffic in the cellular network since it is necessary to transmit downlink signals carrying the same data and/or control information to the MS
10
from every BTS
4
involved in the soft hand-off. This duplication of transmissions is undesirable because each transmission is potentially a source of interference to other transmissions in the network.
For example, the downlink-power control method aims at ensuring that the MS
10
receives a useful downlink signal from every one of the BTSs
4
involved in the soft hand-off. In the event that the downlink signal from one of the BTSs is undergoing a deep fade, the MS
10
will instruct the BTS concerned to increase its downlink transmission power significantly. However, in this case the BTS concerned will inevitably cause greater interference to other transmissions taking place in its cell and in neighboring cells. This problem may be exacerbated if, as in the IS95 standard, only one PCB is allocated in common for downlink power control to all of the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off. In this case, not only does the BTS that is experiencing a deep fade increase its downlink transmission power significantly, but also every other one of the BTSs involved in the soft hand-off increases its downlink transmission power, significantly increasing the interference within the cellular network as a whole.
Therefore, it is desirable to reduce interference in the cellular network associated with the soft hand-off operation. It is also desirable to reduce interference in cellular networks in other situations in which a mobile station is in communications range of more than one base transceiver station.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a cellular
Mohebbi Behzad
Shearme Michael John
Fujitsu Limited
Katten Muchin Zavis & Rosenman
Milord Marceau
LandOfFree
Reducing interference in cellular mobile communications... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Reducing interference in cellular mobile communications..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reducing interference in cellular mobile communications... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3318768