Registers – Records
Reexamination Certificate
1999-09-22
2002-10-22
Lee, Michael G. (Department: 2876)
Registers
Records
C235S493000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06467691
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a record carrier, and particularly, though not exclusively, to a credit card or the like having a secure data storage means. It also relates to a method of labelling an article of value.
A known data carrier is described in GB-A-1,331,604, in which a credit card is provided with a secure data storage means comprising a layer having spaced regions in which anisotropic magnetic particles are dispersed and fixedly aligned in a binder along a pre-set direction. In remaining regions of the layer the particles are not so aligned or are aligned along a substantially different pre-set direction. This arrangement is commonly described as a magnetic “watermark” or as forming a “permanent magnetic structure” since unlike conventional magnetic recordings the pattern of remanent magnetisation revealed by uniaxially magnetising or “developing” the document can be restored by re-magnetisation even after erasure (by, for example, the application of an a/c erase field). A magnetic “watermark” is particularly well suited to recording data in digital form since each alignment direction may be assigned a different significance i.e. a binary “ONE” or a binary “ZERO”. Such a data storage means is fairly secure because the patterns comprising the data cannot be erased because the structure is permanently aligned in a given direction.
Due to the “built-in” nature of the recording, a data storage means may conveniently be prepared as a single “watermarked” tape comprising a sequence of binary coded numbers which provide a security feature when cut from the tape and applied to a support such as a document or card. Each of these identification numbers is different and is separated from the others by a marker or “sentinel” comprising a unique sequence of binary digits which itself never appears in the sequence. For this reason the “sentinel” can always be identified so that by reference to its position on the record carrier the digits chosen by the issuer of the record carrier as an identification number to be characteristic of the record carrier or to represent the security data (a particular set of characters appearing on the document, for example) can always be recovered.
However, due to tolerancing problems during manufacture of the tape and problems of registration between the tape and the support it is not possible without recourse to the use of expensive equipment, to ensure that a “sentinel” or “sentinels” always appear in the same position on the document.
In practice, when one “sentinel” appears at each end of the document the digits between the “sentinels” are chosen to represent the security data. It sometimes occurs, however, that only one “sentinel” appears on the document so that depending upon the exact location an appropriate number of digits, selected from both sides of the “sentinel”, are chosen to represent the security data identifying that document. Thus for each position of the first detected “sentinel” there is a different binary digit selection rule for choosing the bits constituting the security data. The sequence of bits representing the security data may then be used as verification information, or may be used to derive verification information, which for example, the user may have to supply before the card is validated. Such verification information is preferably unique and characteristic of the given record carrier.
This technique, however, has a weakness for the case when the first “sentinel” on the card is close to an edge. In such a case it is possible for the card reader to fail to detect the first “sentinel” and instead pick up the second “sentinel” on the card. Thus there is always the possibility of an ambiguity. For instance suppose that a card is made in a factory, and a piece of magnetic tape is attached to the card, the tape having the number 300 together with parts of the numbers 299 and 301. The card is read in the factory and the identification number 300 is obtained. Without knowing how the “sentinels” lie with respect to the edge of the card, it is possible for card readers in the field to recognise the identification number of the card as 299, 300 or 301. This is clearly undesirable for cards for use in financial transactions, as it might be possible to confuse two cards having adjoining lengths of “watermarked” tape attached to them. It is also undesirable for cards used for claiming benefit, or access control, or identification, or having a stored value such as prepaid fare cards.
In order to solve this problem, “WATERMARK” tape made by THORN Secure Science Limited, Swindon, England, is often applied to cards in a registered fashion such that the “sentinels” always occur at the same point on a card. Increased production costs are associated with such registered cards.
Another method of making security documents is disclosed in GB-A-2 021 835. In this method the position of the sentinel is erasably recorded on a different portion of the document, thus eliminating ambiguity.
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a record carrier. This can provide the advantage of identifying the record carrier uniquely without having to resort to expensive registration schemes to ensure that the markers are always at exactly the same position on the record carrier.
The invention is particularly advantageous for credit cards and the like provided with permanently structured magnetic (“watermark”) tape, as it allows the tape to be placed freely on the carrier without the risk of introducing ambiguity.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a method of labelling an article of value.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3833795 (1974-09-01), Shoshani et al.
patent: 4191376 (1980-03-01), Goldman et al.
patent: 4469937 (1984-09-01), Stockburger et al.
patent: 4645916 (1987-02-01), Raisleger
patent: 4686527 (1987-08-01), Goldman
patent: 4705938 (1987-11-01), Stockburger et al.
patent: 4707593 (1987-11-01), Murata et al.
patent: 4745267 (1988-05-01), Davis et al.
patent: 4992646 (1991-02-01), Collin
patent: 4998009 (1991-03-01), Iijima et al.
patent: 5151582 (1992-09-01), Fujioka
patent: 5499816 (1996-03-01), Levy
patent: 5545883 (1996-08-01), Sasou et al.
patent: 5583333 (1996-12-01), Hoshino et al.
patent: 5703755 (1997-12-01), Flesher
patent: 5714743 (1998-02-01), Chiba et al.
patent: 5880769 (1999-03-01), Nemirofsky et al.
patent: 6029887 (2000-02-01), Furuhashi et al.
patent: 6179211 (2001-01-01), Green et al.
patent: 0 625 766 (1994-11-01), None
patent: 2 069 355 (1971-09-01), None
patent: 2 441 218 (1980-06-01), None
patent: 2 021 835 (1979-12-01), None
patent: 08-022519 (1996-01-01), None
patent: 8-263620 (1996-10-01), None
patent: 10-247229 (1998-09-01), None
patent: 92/16913 (1992-10-01), None
Crowell & Moring LLP
Lee Diane I.
Lee Michael G.
Thorn Secure Science Limited
LandOfFree
Record carrier and method of labelling an article of value does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Record carrier and method of labelling an article of value, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Record carrier and method of labelling an article of value will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2966109