Recombinant promoters in avian cells

Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and – Nonhuman animal – Transgenic nonhuman animal

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C435S349000, C536S024100

Reexamination Certificate

active

10114739

ABSTRACT:
The invention provides for cells containing nucleic acids which include lysozyme gene expression controlling region nucleotide sequences which typically are linked to a polynucleotide encoding a heterologous polypeptide.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4237224 (1980-12-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 4603112 (1986-07-01), Paoletti et al.
patent: 4722848 (1988-02-01), Paoletti et al.
patent: 4769330 (1988-09-01), Paoletti et al.
patent: 5174993 (1992-12-01), Paoletti et al.
patent: 5175384 (1992-12-01), Krimpenfort et al.
patent: 5338683 (1994-08-01), Paoletti et al.
patent: 5494807 (1996-02-01), Paoletti et al.
patent: 5505941 (1996-04-01), Paoletti et al.
patent: 5580859 (1996-12-01), Felgner et al.
patent: 5589466 (1996-12-01), Felgner et al.
patent: 5591639 (1997-01-01), Bebbington
patent: 5731178 (1998-03-01), Sippel et al.
patent: WO 91/06309 (1989-11-01), None
patent: WO 92/06180 (1990-10-01), None
patent: WO 92/19749 (1991-05-01), None
patent: WO 92/20316 (1991-05-01), None
patent: WO 92/22635 (1991-06-01), None
patent: WO 93/04701 (1991-09-01), None
patent: WO 93/25234 (1992-06-01), None
patent: WO 94/06920 (1992-09-01), None
patent: WO 94/11524 (1992-11-01), None
patent: WO 97/47739 (1996-06-01), None
patent: WO 99/19472 (1997-10-01), None
patent: WO 00/11151 (1998-08-01), None
patent: WO 00/56932 (1999-03-01), None
Alberts et al (1994). Molecular Biology of the Cell 3rd ed. Garland Publishing, New York pp. 6 and 227.
von Kries JP, Phi-Van L, Diekmann S, Stratling WH. 1990. A non-curved chicken lysozyme 5′ matrix attachment site is 3′ followed by a strongly curved DNA sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul. 11;18(13):3881-5.
Grewal T, Theisen M, Borgmeyer U, Grussenmeyer T, Rupp RA, Stief A, Qian F, Hecht A, Sippel AE. 1992. The -6.1-kilobase chicken lysozyme enhancer is a multifactorial complex containing several cell-type-specific elements. Mol Cell Biol. May.12(5):2339-50.
Renkawitz R, Schutz G, von der Ahe D, Beato M. 1984. Sequences in the promoter region of the chicken lysozyme gene required for steroid regulation and receptor binding. Cell. Jun.37(2):503-10.
Stumph WE, Hodgson CP, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. 1984. Genomic structure and possible retroviral origin of the chicken CR1 repetitive DNA sequence family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov.81(21):6667-71.
Wagstrom EA, Yoon KJ, Zimmerman JJ. 2000. Immune components in porcine mammary secretions. Viral Immunol. 2000;13(3):383-97.
Jung A, Sippel AE, Grez M, Schutz G. 1980. Exons encode functional and structural units of chicken lysozyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 77(10):5759-63.
Exons encode functional and structural units of chicken lysozyme, Jung et al; PNAS USA, 77:5759-5763, (Oct. 1980).
An Initiation Zone of Chromosomal DNA Replication at the Chicken Lysozyme Gene Locus*, Loc Phi-van et al; The Journal of Biological Chemistry 273:18300-18307 (1998).
The matrix attachment regions of the chicken lysozyme gene co-map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain, Phi-Van and Stratling; EMBO Journal 7:655-664 (1988).
Lysozme Level in Blood Serum of Newly Hatched White Leghorn Chickens, Rosolowska-Huszcz; Bulletin De L'academie Polonaise Des Sciences, 26:891-894 (1978).
Prerequisites for tissue specific and position independent expression of a gene locus in transgenic mice, Bonifer et al; J Mol Med 74:663-671(1996).
A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity, Stief et al; Nature 341:343-345(Sep. 1989).
Tissue specific and position independent expression of the complete gene domain for chicken lysozyme in transgenic mice, Bonifer et al; EMBO Journal 9:2843-2848 (1990).
Stopped at the border: boundaries and insulators, Bell and Felsenfeld; Current Opinion in Genetics & Development,9:191-198(1999).
Dissection of the Ability of the Chicken Lysozyme Gene 5′ Matrix Attachment Region To Stimulate Transgene Expression and To Dampen Position Effects; Phi-Van and Stratling; Biochemistry 35:10735-10742(1996).
Activity of two different silencer elements of the chicken lysozyme gene can be compensated by enhancer elements, Baniahmad et al; EMBO Journal 6:2297-2303(1987).
The lysozyme enhancer: cell-specific activation of the chicken lysozyme gene by a far-upstream DNA element, Theisen et al; EMBO Journal 5:719-724(1986).
The Chicken Lysozyme Locus as a Paradigm for the Complex Developmental Regulation of Eukaryotic Gene Loci, Bonifer et al; Journal of Biological Chemistry 272:26075-26078(1997).
A progesterone responsive element maps to the far upstream steroid dependent DNase hypersensitive site of chicken lysozyme chromatin, Hecht et al; EMBO Journal 7:2063-2073(1988).
Chromatin fine structure profiles for a developmentally regulated gene: reorganization of the lysozyme locus before trans-activator binding and gene expression, Kontaraki et al.; Genes & Developmental 14:210 2122(2000).
The Far Upstream Chicken Lysozyme Enhancer at-6.1 Kilobase, by Interacting with NF-M, Mediates Lipopolysaccharide-induced Expression of the Chicken Lysozyme Gene in Chicken Myelomonocytic Cells, Goethe and Phi Van; Journal of Biological Chemistry 269:31302-31309(1994).
Chromatin Domains Constitute Regulatory Units for the Control of Eukaryotic genes, Sippel et al;Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 58:37-44(1993).
Dynamic Changes in the Chromatin of the Chicken Lysozyme Gene Domain During Differentiation of Multipotent Progenitors to Macrophages, Huber et al; DNA and Cell Biology 14:397-402(1995).
Alternative sets of DNase I-hypersensitive sites characterize the various functional states of the chicken lysozyme gene, Fritton et al; Nature 311:163-165(Sep. 1984).
Reduced Position Effect in Mature Transgenic Plants conferred by the Chicken Lysozyme Matrix-Associated Region, Mlynarova et al;The Plant Cell 6:417-426(1994).
Development of position-independent expression vectors and their transfer into transgenic fish, Caldovic and Hackett; Mol. Marine Biol. and Biotech 4:51-61(1995).
Chicken repeat 1(CR1) elements, which define an ancient family of vertebrate non-LTR retrotransposons, contain two closely spaced open reading frames, Haas et al; Gene 197:305-309(1997).
Sequence conservation in avian CR1: An interspersed repetitive DNA family evolving under functional constraints, Chen et al; PNAS USA 88:5814-5818 (Jul. 1991).
Position-independent expression of transgenic in zebrafish, Caldovic et al; Transgenic Research 8:321-334(1999).
Lysozyme in Hen Blood Serum, Sato and Watanabe, Poultry Science 55:1749-1756(1976).
“Lysozyme gene Activity in Chicken Macrophages is Controlled by Positive and Negative Regulatory Elements”GG2, Steiner et al; Nucleic Acids Research, 15:4163-4178 (1987).
Chong, et al., The chicken lysozyme chromatin domain contains a second, widely expressed gene,Nucleic Acids Research,vol. 30, No. 2 (2002) 463-467.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Recombinant promoters in avian cells does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Recombinant promoters in avian cells, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Recombinant promoters in avian cells will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3759512

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.