Pumps – Motor driven – Electric or magnetic motor
Reexamination Certificate
2003-01-24
2004-08-17
Yu, Justine R. (Department: 3746)
Pumps
Motor driven
Electric or magnetic motor
C417S269000, C417S271000, C417S559000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06776589
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to reciprocating piston fluid compression devices such as hermetic refrigerant compressors, particularly with regard to quieting same.
Fluid compression devices such as, for example, refrigerant compressors, receive a gas at a suction pressure and compress it to a relatively higher, discharge pressure. Depending on the type of compression device, the work exerted on the gas in compressing it is characterized by a series of intermittently exerted forces on the gas, the magnitude of these forces normally varying from zero to some maximum value. For example, in a cylinder of a reciprocating piston type compressor, this force ranges from zero at the piston's bottom dead center (BDC) position, to a maximum at or near the piston's top dead center (TDC) position, at which the pressure of the compressed gas is respectively at a minimum pressure (i.e., substantially suction pressure) and a maximum pressure (i.e., substantially discharge pressure). Some quantity of the gas is discharged from the cylinder as the piston assumes new positions as it advances from BDC to TDC, and thus the compressed gas flowing from the cylinder is not at a uniform pressure. Rather, the gas which flows from the cylinder, which is generally referred to as being at discharge pressure, actually has many different pressures.
Pulses of higher discharge pressure result in the compressed gas flowing from the cylinder, these pulses being in the portion of the flowing gas which leaves the cylinder as the piston approaches or reaches TDC. As the piston cycles in its cylinder, regular, equally distributed patterns of these pulses are created in the compressed gas which flows through a conduit, tube or line leading from the compression mechanism. The pulsating flow of compressed gas through this discharge line may be represented by sine waves of various frequencies and having amplitudes which may vary with changes in the quality of the refrigerant; these changes are effected by changes in refrigerant type, temperature or pressure. Pulsations at certain frequencies may be more noticeable, and thus more objectionable, than others.
Further, the nominal discharge pressure, i.e., the pressure at which the compressed gas is generally considered to be, will also vary with refrigerant quality. The frequency of these high pressure pulses in the compressed gas flowing through the discharge line, however, has a substantially constant frequency which directly correlates to the speed at which the gas is compressed in the cylinder, and the number of cylinders in operation. This frequency is referred to as the primary pumping frequency, and is generally the lowest frequency exhibited by the pressure pulsations in the compressed gas.
The amplitude of the pressure pulses at the primary pumping frequency tend to be the largest in the compressed gas flow. Because the primary pumping pulses are at low frequencies and large amplitudes, they are often the primary cause of objectionable noise or vibration characteristics in compressors or the refrigeration systems into which these compressors are incorporated. These systems normally also include at least two heat exchangers, a refrigerant expansion device, and associated refrigerant lines which link these components into a closed loop relationship. Pressure pulsations at other, higher frequencies have amplitudes which are relatively smaller, but certain of these pressure pulsations may also be objectionable. Further, some objectionable pressure pulsations may establish themselves in the conduits or lines which convey refrigerant substantially at suction pressure to the compression mechanism.
Substantial effort has been expended in attempting to quiet these pressure pulses in addressing noise or vibration concerns, and it is known to provide mufflers in the discharge or suction lines to help resolve these issues. These mufflers may be of the expansion chamber type, in which a first refrigerant line portion opens directly into a chamber, wherein the amplitude and/or frequency of at least one of the pulses may be altered, and from which the refrigerant exits through a second line portion. Further, it is known that the discharge chamber in the head of a reciprocating piston compressor can also serve as a type of expansion chamber muffler. An expansion chamber type muffler of any type is not entirely satisfactory, however, for it may cause a substantial pressure drop in the gas as it flows therethrough, resulting in compressor inefficiency. Further, such mufflers may not provide sufficient attenuation required by the application.
An alternative to an expansion chamber type of muffler is what is well known in the art as a Helmholtz resonator type of muffler wherein the wall of a portion of the discharge pressure line may be provided with a plurality of holes, that portion of the discharge line is sealably connected to a shell which defines a resonance chamber, the holes in the discharge line providing fluid communication between the interior of the discharge line and the resonance chamber. The size and/or quantity and/or axial spacing of these holes, and the volume of the resonance chamber, are variably sized to tune a Helmholtz resonator to a particular frequency, and the amplitude of pulses at that frequency are thereby attenuated. Compared to an expansion chamber type of muffler, a Helmholtz muffler provides the advantage of not causing so significant a pressure drop in the fluid flowing therethrough; thus compressor efficiency is not compromised to the same degree.
Although a Helmholtz resonator may be effective for attenuating the amplitude of fluid pulses having shorter wavelengths, in which case the resonator extends axially over at least a substantial portion of the pulse wavelength, prior Helmholtz resonator arrangements may not be effective for attenuating the amplitude of fluid pulses having longer wave lengths. As mentioned above, the primary pumping frequency tends to be rather low, the primary pumping pulses cyclically distributed over a rather long wavelength. By way of the example of a single-speed hermetic reciprocating piston type compressor, the motor thereof rotates at a speed which is directly correlated to the frequency of the alternating current (AC) electrical power which drives it. In the United States, AC power is provided at 60 cycles/second. The electrical current is directed through the windings of the motor stator, and electromagnetically imparts rotation to the rotor disposed inside the stator. The crankshaft of the compressor is rotatably fixed to the rotor and drives the reciprocating piston, which compresses the refrigerant. Thus the primary pumping frequency is at or near 60 cycles per second. The speed of sound in refrigerant gas at the discharge temperature and pressure of this example is 7200 inches per second. Thus, in accordance with the equation:
c/f=&lgr; (1)
where speed “c” is 7200 inches per second and frequency “f” is 60 cycles per second, for the above example wavelength “&lgr;” of the primary pumping pulse is 120 inches. Notably, should the compressor be of the two cylinder variety, twice as many primary pumping pulses will be issued per revolution of the crankshaft; thus &lgr; will then be 60 inches. It can be readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that simply providing a single Helmholtz resonator in the discharge line may be largely ineffective for attenuating the amplitude of a pulse which has such a long wavelength, for the point(s) of maximum pulse amplitude, which ought to be coincident with the resonator, may be too far separated. In order for a single Helmholtz resonator to quiet a pulse having such a long wavelength, the resonator would be far too long to facilitate easy packaging within the refrigerant system, let alone within the hermetic compressor housing.
What is needed is a noise attenuation system for a compression device which effectively addresses the noise and vibration issues associated with pressure pulses of relatively long wa
DiFlora Michael A.
Gopinathan Anil
Paczuski Andrew W.
Shafer Ronny A.
Tomell Phillip A.
Baker & Daniels
Rodriguez William H.
Tecumseh Products Company
Yu Justine R.
LandOfFree
Reciprocating piston compressor having improved noise... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Reciprocating piston compressor having improved noise..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reciprocating piston compressor having improved noise... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3306157